| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
Planes Hitting Twin Towers Were Computer Graphics
Look carefully at the plane's underbelly. What's that lump doing sticking out of the bottom? See the video at the end for the explanation. It will surprise you. If you think there's nothing sticking out of the plane's fuselage, then you are deceiving yourself. Take a break. Come back in a few minutes and look again.
I was sent this web address by a reader, and if anyone ever doubted whether 911 was a fabricated false flag event, with the events that happened being very different to the ones we were told at the time, this should help them make up their minds.
In confirmation watch what happened to the flight crews who never returned.
You can watch a long video needing an hour or so and see it all explained if you want, or spend just two minutes viewing these visual explanations of why the imagery of the towers being hit by planes are the work of computer graphics.
(The only problem might be that these films are themselves a deception, put out to confuse. Yet who would do that and why? With even MSM now starting to admit that 911 should be approached 'with an open mind' (Fox News), I am taking these films as genuine for the time being.)
There are a lot more details in the video, but this is enough for most people to see. Things like how could the cockpit of the plane hitting the South Tower reappear intact and in line of flight, after passing through a steel building? The networks realised this error and removed the clip from their archive and blanked the picture on 911 itself by covering it over with a banner, but many Americans had already videoed the error.
http://septemberclues.info/wtc_airplanes.htm
In some copies of the event, the smoke is white. In others it is black. Similar views of the towers have different backgrounds. The number of inconsistencies concerning the images are so great, there is no point me listing them all out here.
Take your time with this. It is an emotional journey to go through, which is fascinating and depressing all at the same time. This was an act of war, in which many people died. That in itself makes this hard to watch, but you owe it to yourself not be taken as a fool by the media. Form your own conclusions, but at least look at the evidence. And as I say, take your time.
Also from septemberclues is the estimation that the number of casualties in the towers was far lower -
Fortunately, a little solace may be found in the latest findings of this research : it is gradually emerging (see the Vicsim Report) that the list of 9/11 victims (approx. 2,928) is a mostly forged database of fictitious identities and forged/morphed photographs.
Study the evidence. Take your time. I found the evidence compelling, especially when juxtaposed alongside many eyewitness reports which said they saw no planes, that they heard explosions, and some say they heard a missile.
Here is the detailed footage showing the reasons why the plane impacts are fake which the whole world believed to be a real event changing history at the time, including me.
FROM NORTH TRUTHSEEKER -
I didn't know that Fox News has released information demonstrating 9/11 to be a scam. One third of Americans now believe it to be so, which is another reason why The Tea Party is gaining ground.
TAP - The pulling of WTC 7, without any impact from any plane, missile or device, is the starting point for many sceptics. Once Flight 93 was shot down by a pilot disobeying orders, there was no cover story for how there was a plane available to crash into the building. WTC 7 was intended to be hit by a 'plane' like the Twin Towers, making it three impacts in New York City.
So what killed the missing air hostesses?
In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.For a detailed assessment of when Bin Laden actually died, go toOsama Bin Elvis, an American Spectator article from 2009.
Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane.
Graphics creation explained in more detail -
Long explanation on how the missing passengers on 911 were liquidated.
Here is another bizarre clip of the plane approaching the tower where the software gets confused and first makes the 'plane' disappear behind the tower, until it suddenly reappears and disappears again just before something impacts the tower. This betrays the method used to convert the flying ball into an image of the plane, using the same kind of software that created the movie Avatar. Except here in 2001, rushing to get TV pictures out quickly, it malfunctioned.
Me explains -
on the close up you can see the light halo around the plane that has been graphically added to the background without the colours matching perfectly.
Notice also the whole footage as edited to just a few seconds before impact to minimise the amount of editing they had to do to hide the ball.
At 10-13 seconds in, continuing with the close-up slo-mo, the plane disappears, but you can still just make out a ball shape continuing toward the tower.
It is so dark in the shadow they haven't bothered to add wings.
It gets particularly weird around 12-14 seconds when the ball seems to disappear then a plane shape reemerges into the light slightly higher than it was.
TAP Freeze at 16 seconds. The hole is tiny and could not possibly allow a plane to enter the building. You can see why this clip was discarded and not used for TV coverage at the time.
Before impact the ball becomes most visible at the back of the plane. It doesn't look like a tail wing, the back of the plane has a round shaped attached to it.
On entry there is little damage until the ball goes in, and then the first sign of smoke is from a ball-shaped hole.
Also, the explosion on entry is in a different place (closer to the edge) than on the other close up CNN video.
UPDATE - , showing this was a computer graphic.
UPDATE – Meet the hijackers. Ten years on, they are still alive.
THIS GUY FORETOLD 911 A FEW WEEKS AHEAD -
THIS GUY WHO WAS SAID TO BE A FLIGHT 93 HERO, NEVER EXISTED.
The evidence of 911 being falsehood just piles up and up.
Look carefully at the plane's underbelly. What's that lump doing sticking out of the bottom? See the video at the end for the explanation. It will surprise you. If you think there's nothing sticking out of the plane's fuselage, then you are deceiving yourself. Take a break. Come back in a few minutes and look again.
I was sent this web address by a reader, and if anyone ever doubted whether 911 was a fabricated false flag event, with the events that happened being very different to the ones we were told at the time, this should help them make up their minds.
In confirmation watch what happened to the flight crews who never returned.
You can watch a long video needing an hour or so and see it all explained if you want, or spend just two minutes viewing these visual explanations of why the imagery of the towers being hit by planes are the work of computer graphics.
(The only problem might be that these films are themselves a deception, put out to confuse. Yet who would do that and why? With even MSM now starting to admit that 911 should be approached 'with an open mind' (Fox News), I am taking these films as genuine for the time being.)
There are a lot more details in the video, but this is enough for most people to see. Things like how could the cockpit of the plane hitting the South Tower reappear intact and in line of flight, after passing through a steel building? The networks realised this error and removed the clip from their archive and blanked the picture on 911 itself by covering it over with a banner, but many Americans had already videoed the error.
http://septemberclues.info/wtc_airplanes.htm
In some copies of the event, the smoke is white. In others it is black. Similar views of the towers have different backgrounds. The number of inconsistencies concerning the images are so great, there is no point me listing them all out here.
Take your time with this. It is an emotional journey to go through, which is fascinating and depressing all at the same time. This was an act of war, in which many people died. That in itself makes this hard to watch, but you owe it to yourself not be taken as a fool by the media. Form your own conclusions, but at least look at the evidence. And as I say, take your time.
Also from septemberclues is the estimation that the number of casualties in the towers was far lower -
Fortunately, a little solace may be found in the latest findings of this research : it is gradually emerging (see the Vicsim Report) that the list of 9/11 victims (approx. 2,928) is a mostly forged database of fictitious identities and forged/morphed photographs.
Study the evidence. Take your time. I found the evidence compelling, especially when juxtaposed alongside many eyewitness reports which said they saw no planes, that they heard explosions, and some say they heard a missile.
Here is the detailed footage showing the reasons why the plane impacts are fake which the whole world believed to be a real event changing history at the time, including me.
FROM NORTH TRUTHSEEKER -
I didn't know that Fox News has released information demonstrating 9/11 to be a scam. One third of Americans now believe it to be so, which is another reason why The Tea Party is gaining ground.
TAP - The pulling of WTC 7, without any impact from any plane, missile or device, is the starting point for many sceptics. Once Flight 93 was shot down by a pilot disobeying orders, there was no cover story for how there was a plane available to crash into the building. WTC 7 was intended to be hit by a 'plane' like the Twin Towers, making it three impacts in New York City.
So what killed the missing air hostesses?
In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.For a detailed assessment of when Bin Laden actually died, go toOsama Bin Elvis, an American Spectator article from 2009.
Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane.
Graphics creation explained in more detail -
Long explanation on how the missing passengers on 911 were liquidated.
Here is another bizarre clip of the plane approaching the tower where the software gets confused and first makes the 'plane' disappear behind the tower, until it suddenly reappears and disappears again just before something impacts the tower. This betrays the method used to convert the flying ball into an image of the plane, using the same kind of software that created the movie Avatar. Except here in 2001, rushing to get TV pictures out quickly, it malfunctioned.
Me explains -
on the close up you can see the light halo around the plane that has been graphically added to the background without the colours matching perfectly.
Notice also the whole footage as edited to just a few seconds before impact to minimise the amount of editing they had to do to hide the ball.
At 10-13 seconds in, continuing with the close-up slo-mo, the plane disappears, but you can still just make out a ball shape continuing toward the tower.
It is so dark in the shadow they haven't bothered to add wings.
It gets particularly weird around 12-14 seconds when the ball seems to disappear then a plane shape reemerges into the light slightly higher than it was.
TAP Freeze at 16 seconds. The hole is tiny and could not possibly allow a plane to enter the building. You can see why this clip was discarded and not used for TV coverage at the time.
Before impact the ball becomes most visible at the back of the plane. It doesn't look like a tail wing, the back of the plane has a round shaped attached to it.
On entry there is little damage until the ball goes in, and then the first sign of smoke is from a ball-shaped hole.
Also, the explosion on entry is in a different place (closer to the edge) than on the other close up CNN video.
UPDATE - , showing this was a computer graphic.
UPDATE – Meet the hijackers. Ten years on, they are still alive.
THIS GUY FORETOLD 911 A FEW WEEKS AHEAD -
THIS GUY WHO WAS SAID TO BE A FLIGHT 93 HERO, NEVER EXISTED.
The evidence of 911 being falsehood just piles up and up.
