| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
100% Proof WTC Plane Was Not A Plane At All (Video)
A remade video of an older version, this one contains many new witnesses.
Common questions: How did the shadow government (the conspirators) take over the planes?
Answer: They could have done it by having CIA agents on the plane along with their arab mercinaries and made the people believe it was a hijacking, and then flown the plane manually to a remote base where they got rid of all the passengers and then took the plane apart.
Possibility 2: They just took over the plane from the ground, turned off the transponder and then flew the plane to wherever they prepared it for. (All commercial airliners are designed so that full control can be taken of the plane from the ground).
What about the calls that were made by the passengers?
Answer: If you believe that no such thing as voice morph is possible that can fool relatives and loved ones, watch “The afterlife investigations”. The calls were impossible and many were suspicious, for example, Ted Olson claimed that his wife called him from a seatphone from 1 of the planes, turns out that particular American Airlines plane had no seatphones.
His testimony contradicts what the FBI later concluded in their “investigation” about the calls. Ted Olson was also a Bush administration insider, they could have very well just made him come up with this story to give some credibility to the hijacker theory.
Why are there around 3 people who said the second plane was United Airlines?
Answer: It is expected that the shadow government would have actors ready on phone/running around trying to get some airtime to say the plane was a UA plane, so nothing strange there, and many probably got fooled and said it was a UA plane based on the painted tail, which was infact blue, they just did not bother painting the rest of the plane blue for a reason, I assume they thought that there would be no close-up shots of the belly. But all the close-up shots show the plane had a grey belly, the same shade of grey that the towers had in the shadow.
There is 1 very common faked “still-image” on the web that shows a semi-high resolution picture of a UA plane about to hit the second tower, this picture has no source and even looks fake. We have 2 clear video sources showing the plane had a grey belly, this just shows that the conspirators had this image faked to give some credibility to the UA 175 theory.
heres the problem I have with this story line
why?
If you’re prepared to take out bldgs and kll thousands of people, why bother to substitute the planes. It would be easier to just do it.
Every intel agency on earth has a rolodex full of assets and patsies ready to go at a moments notice. Just wind them up and set them loose. How many amazing “just in time” foiled plots have turned out to be provocateur instigated operations since 911?
Have a couple of critical security measures turned off. Have some key people looking in the wrong direction at the right time, and the plan takes care of its self.
no plane switches. no secret landing strips. no remote controls. no body disposal. no canned phone calls. its just not needed.
You’re trying to apply reason to insane leaders, it’s like arguing with a drunk.
Look up the quantum dot, and electron made matter (electrons being aligned into form via electro-magnetic energy). This is the basis of solid holograms.
Note that the planes disintegrate when the hit the building like Legos would if thrown against a wall.
Dude, the date and time stamp on your eyewitness video that starts around the 3 min mark has the wrong date.
Why the planes? Here’s why.
By having the planes hit the tops of the towers everyone was looking up. I guarantee you that something much bigger was happening on the ground that day nobody saw because their attention was focused on the tops of the buildings or on their own safety. To become completely invisible that day all one had to do was dress as a fireman or policeman, then they could do whatever the hell they wanted because nobody cared what was going on at ground level, they only cared about what was going on at the top.
I am positive that we already have all of the information we need to figure 9/11 out ourselves but we are all still focused on what we saw that day. Well, we already know what we saw but what else did we see? Or should have seen but didn’t? Have you considered that we are still being manipulated by being ‘told’ to look up because that is where most videos are focused up until the towers fell?
We are missing the forest for the trees.
This is disinfo garbage, made to discredit the valid theories. The more wacko they can make “conspiracy theories” seem, the more likely people will believe the government’s conspiracy theory regarding 9/11. The more they pass this disinfo garbage around, the more they can dismiss valid theories by linking them to this garbage.
Why substitute the planes at all, yes. But thinking about it not one, two or three but four planes crashed and disintegrated on impact leaving no visable trace – where in normal planes crashes lots of evidence should have been available. No part numbers for any of the planes have been put foward in evidence that would stand up in court. Even the black boxes have been in some doubt. If the real original planes were used I’m sure we wouldn’t have the official story of jet fuel burning up aluminium or planes penetrating reinforced steel girders leaving ‘comical’ plane outlines in the building.
To my mind the total destruction was needed to hide what the planes really were and contained. Nothing else would do. Therefore it follows that the planes crashing that day were probably not those that took off that day.
I mean the leisurely way the planes wandered around the American sky that morning should be a clue to everyone. Casually crossing military and civilian airstrips while the pride of the Top Guns supposedly had their thumbs up their asses.
The destruction that day could not have been caused by normal airliners. The evidence points to that and even the official story has problems with it believing in miracles rather than physics. The planners knew normal aircraft such as the passenger airplanes could not do the correct job
If the original airplanes took no part, then the phone calls are proven fakes, ‘let’s roll’ never happened, there was nothing to chase by intercepting aircraft, the last plane that was too late to join in the fun had to be destroyed to cover up it was fake, the discovered passports had to have been planted and so on.
911 was just the beginning to the evil of the NWO Cabal, the up and comming “False flag” and followup “Marshall Law” will be the knockout punch for America and our Republic.
Why substitute the planes?
1. Because normal 767′s can’t do the job.
2. human error.
3. allow for many plan B’s if plan A messes up (review 1 and 2)
CIA said Operation Northwoods above and nukes below.
You still have to cut things up too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz1fkKjpApE
this piece of info here is disinfo mixed with some truth. 2nd tower hit by a ball-like UFO if you care to research on this. the plane was ‘inserted’ later and there were serious errors in it with the video showing the 2nd plane going thru the second tower intact as one can see the nose of the plane on the other side of the tower. ha ha ha.