Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
My name is Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, and I am a medical student. Throughout my rigorous undergraduate science and medical science coursework, I have had the privilege of receiving extensive training in the process of scientific analysis and evidence-based thinking.
I am writing to you today not only as a medical student, but also as a concerned American citizen, to ask for your help with something very important.
Have you heard of Dr. Judy Wood? Did you know she has been researching 9/11 since 2001 and has already filed several law suits against NIST’s contractors for science fraud, and legal requests that NIST’s fraudulent data gets reexamined? Dr. Judy Wood has received more than one threat due to the research she has done and the evidence she has gathered, and one of her students was also murdered in 2006. Surprisingly, Dr. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 researcher who has submitted evidence to the courts in pursuit of the truth.
I. In 2007, Dr. Judy Wood filed several legal cases against the corporations NIST had contracted to conduct the 9/11 “investigations”, many of which are military / defense / weapons organizations involved in Directed Energy research (huge conflict-of-interest). The filings in these legal cases included Requests For Corrections (RFC) based on the Data Quality Act, and Qui Tam whistle-blower cases. One of her legal cases made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009. She has been actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Steven Jones and other members of the 9/11 Truth community. The legal documents from her court cases can be viewed at the following links:
1. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html
2.http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml
II. Dr. Judy Wood has collected an overwhelming amount of evidence which suggests that a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind was used to powderize (‘dustify’) the primary steel and concrete portions of the WTC buildings, while burning and bending aluminum, yet leaving paper and many other materials unharmed. These characteristics are matched by those of “The Hutchison Effect”, and are the result of “field effects” and energy interference. John Hutchison has filed an affidavit in Dr. Wood’s court case, to legally testify to the numerous similarities between The Hutchison Effect and the 9/11 attacks.
III. Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bi-material joints. She has taught courses including: Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), Strength of Materials Testing.
1. Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D – ‘The New Hiroshima’ Presentation (Part 1): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSN7dKSAaM
2. Dr. Judy Wood’s evidence-packed website:http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc
3. A very important, related website:http://www.checktheevidence.com
IV. Here are some very important video documentaries discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology, which are related to 9/11:
1. John Hutchison & The Hutchison Effect (Documentary | 68mins): http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5866006842090712676
2. Heavy Watergate: The Cold Fusion Cover Up (Documentary | 45mins): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6562030534380820378
3. Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U
4. Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985) similar to The Hutchison Effect:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MovpYUD7fTY
5. What Turned The Twin Towers To DUST on 9/11?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo
Thank you for your time, consideration, and help,
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Try telling Judy Wood since to date all I’ve seen is a list of BS without any conclusions. Has it finally picked a dew one or a few? Absolutely not, then it could be shown for the disinfo ‘magical thinking’ that it is.
http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/
1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,
2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 6)) of WTC Land Brought to Seering Temperatures in a Few Hours by an ’Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm– Best,
3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value
of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141
4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for
Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm
5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of
micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm– Best
6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm
7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm
All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…
The micro nuke theory seems too risky for the “bath tub” around the WTC. There are a lot of things John Hutchinson has supposedly done that defy many laws of physics as we know them. Your claims are based on what we think is true and you state them as fact. You claim Tritium can only come from a nuke, but John Hutchinson says he uses Tritium, an electrostatic charge, and radio waves in his experiments. We know that an offshore hurricane was near by to supply the static charge and Tritium was also found. I do not think that you can completely write off what she is saying until you learn more about what John Hutchinson has done, and research HAARP(one hundred billion watts of power).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD__KJJhRQI
http://endthelie.com/books-and-reading-material/haarp-exposed/#axzz2IhhlavGc
Spingola Speaks to Dr. Judy Wood and Jerry Leaphart – The 9/11 Court Cases – April 14th, 2011 (1hr 29mins) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzhmQGBa_Wk
(Jerry Leaphart is a political activist and the attorney who helped Dr. Wood with her court cases.)