Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Published on Jun 25, 2013
Eric Catuccio I’d just like to point out one thing. I made that video for people to show to their grandmas (the completely uninformed) so they could understand by the end that the government was involved. People don’t have time for this stuff. They have jobs and pets and kids and mortgages and they watch cnn and fox news. I wanted my message to be as short as possible and be complete and not require any additional information so people wouldn’t have to go search for more info and weed int out from disinfo until you don’t know which end is up anymore and they throw up their hands and walk away. The short version of the proof is. Molten steel seen by 1st responders leading to major major scientific fraud by the U.S. government which equates to involvement. The fraud is the important thing. You can rule out honest mistakes immediately. That’s a smoking gun. I don’t need or want another. There are so many “smoking guns” that are circumstantial and prove nothing. I wish the words Scientific fraud would enter the consciousness of the world. I hear anti-science name-calling thrown around at evolution deniers and vaccine supporters, and sometimes it’s true, but everybody seems to forget about fraud, when the conclusion is a lie brought on by fraudulent science with corrupted and manipulated data.
Eric Catuccio FYI I agree and cuts to a clear point, that’s why I like it so much.. I am just pointing out where the evidence is currently i.e the “NYPD 9/11 Museum” which does have signs identifying lava was located at Ground Zero along with objects anyone can take a look at and maybe ask more questions. For those who do have time this additional evidence adds creditability and does not subtract from it or add any additional complexity. It Also supports all your claims even more. If your claims didn’t have support in addition to the hearsay evidence there would be great holes in your argument. The only problem is the evidence held at museums actually require much hotter temperatures then the requirements you refer to i.e just melting steel.
Then you are changing the subject, because you posted a response to my request for structural evidence. Show us the artificially severed beams and columns from the Towers; pure and simple. And any claim “the evidence is unavailable” is a lie. Make your own post if you wish to discuss some other topic.
Joe Hill