Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Suppressed 2002 German Report On 9/11

Friday, January 10, 2014 14:42
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Veterans today
 

TOP SECRET

ScreenHunter_2581 Jan. 08 15.17

(Translated from German.  The original document, after careful forensic examination is considered “inconclusive.”  It has not been proven fake in any way. Ed.)

On Monday 6, August, 2001, at 17:50, [German] Ambassador Ischinger personally  notified the President of the United States that information developed by the  Bundesamt fur Verfassungsschutz [German domestic secret service] as well as the  BND [Bundesnachrichtendienst, German foreign secret service] indicated that an  attack by a radical Arab group partially based in Germany was to occur on 10-11  September, 2001. The President was at that time in residence at his farm in  Texas. Our [the German’s] Ambassador was acting in direct response to  instructions from Foreign Minister Fischer.

This information was developed from official surveillance of Arab extremist  groups operating in the Federal Republic as well as from intercepted  communications between the Embassy of Israel and the Israeli Foreign Ministry in  Tel Aviv concerning this matter.

The information was “gratefully received” by the US President who stated at  the time that he was also aware of the same pending assaults.

Subsequent to these attacks, the office of the US President, through the US  Department of State, made an urgent request to the government of the Federal  Republic of Germany that no reference whatsoever should be made to the official  warnings given by Ambassador Ischinger.

In order to clarify the background of this matter, this Gesamtubersicht  [overall survey] of the events leading to the assault was prepared, basing on  extracts of reports from our [BND’s] foreign stations. Overall, it is evident  that the American authorities were aware of the pending attacks. Why they did  nothing, is explained in the following.

Background: General Overview

Because of the Bush family’s involvement in oil (Zapata Oil Company), many  important and wealthy individuals and corporations with oil interests  financially supported the Bush political career. Today, the Bush administration  is therefore strongly influenced by major American business groups.

The candidate for American Vice President, Richard “Dick” Cheney, had been  the Chief Director of the Halliburton Company. This company, based in Dallas,  Texas, where Bush was Governor, is the largest oil service company in the  world.

Between 1991 and 1997, such important American oil companies as Texaco,  Unocal, Shell, BP Amoco, Chevron and Exxon-Mobil became involved with the former  Soviet state of Kazakhstan who holds enormous oil reserves. The government of  Kazakhstan was eventually paid over $3 billions of corporate money to allow  these companies to secure oil rights. At the same time, these companies agreed  further to give the sums of 35 billion US Dollar in investments in plant and  equipment to the Kazakhstan projects. A confidential project report of said US  firms announced that the gas and oil reserves in Kazakhstan would amount to 4  trillion US Dollar.

The United States is not self-sufficient in oil and 50% of their supply is  imported from various foreign sources. Some 80% of oil imported to the US comes  from OPEC-Countries, the Arabian oil cartel. Because of the unconditional  support by American political leaders of the state of Israel, these Arab  governments have a very strained relationship with the USA. (no longer true…editorial note)

A further small percentage of oil imported to the US comes from Venezuela.  Just recently, the US government has been attempting to overthrow the government  of Chavez with the help of the CIA and replace it with a government “more  sympathetic to American oil needs.”

A position paper prepared by the office of the later-Vice President Cheney  states that the Kazakhstan oil reserves would be “more than sufficient to supply  US needs for at least a decade” and would further “reduce American dependence on  OPEC.”

Read More Here

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.