| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
NEW finding on 9/11/01 discovered 04/20/15 – STRANGE.
Believe it or not – this is actual NEWLY discovered information on 9/11/01 – which has gone previously undiscovered – but is now found and presented on 04/20/15, by Houston Skywatch. I never thought there would be ANY stone left unturned again on 9/11 research, and while doing my typical astronomical research which is almost entirely unrelated, I stumbled upon this. As a matter of fact – this following clip below has nothing to do with 9/11 and is in relation to NRO Space Satellites. I have seen every last bit of 9/11 conspiracy on the web but have NEVER seen this information anywhere else before. It is, granted, only a small bit of information but its point is VERY telling to the wide supression of the truth we are told. You can’t tell me archive.org just happened to suppress all news coverage leading up to 9/11 for over 2 weeks, then left one date from August – for all of the news media. (This will make sense when seeing the video.)
I’d appreciate everyone to watch the whole clip as we do some good work but the specific part in the clip about 9/11/01, coincidentally and completely unintended, is at around (and I’m not kidding) 9 minutes and 11 seconds into the final clip: https://youtu.be/033UXnm4jWA?t=9m
This is not the sort of typical work we do, rather, we stumbled upon this by happenstance. It was only discovered in the past day or two and is very bizarre info. There is no logical explanation why archive.org is blank on all news sites leading up to 9/11. The only reason I searched news sites was to illustrate how the site works, and I was shocked to see that all of the records are missing. I also figured, being that Donald Rumsfeld, at the time, said the day before that trillions of dollars went missing - I was naturally curious to see if I could find a news report on it. It is apparently extremely difficult to get anything removed from archive.org and you can only do so with a legitimate court order. They treat their information like the Library of Congress and an official record of history. (Or now I would say – they claim to, and allegedly, treat their information seriously – unless it goes up something high up the chain politically – in my personal opinion.)
I’m not sure what you would call the fact that it just so happens to be at 9:11 into the clip, that is the info about 9/11, perhaps, premonition? Sheer chance? I do not believe in coincidence and so I am honestly not sure. Please do not let that take away from the evidence. This is not the sort of work we usually do. I posted the video and this was pointed out to me – and being how transparent we are with our videos – I’m addressing it. Here is the video – NO ads - just my footage, which is all very interesting but if you must, skip to 9:11 to see the 9/11 info: (THIS WAS NOT done on purpose.)
I should mention as this has now been pointed out to me and I’ve been accused of making up the time frame or that I am attempting some sort of psy op. I edited this video in the order of my findings in a very specific format that I follow for ALL of my videos, which are unreleated to this conspiracy entirely – with no time guidelines in place – and I assure you I did not at all control the fact that part 3, where the 9/11 discrepancy was, is approximately 9:11 seconds into the video. This is a stunning coincidence in itself and I have no idea how this happened. If you can’t tell I presented quite a bit of information before even getting into the 9/11 info. I have total control over it but do not keep track of my seconds and only go off of general minutes of time to keep the clips of reasonable size. I do not place anything at certain time frames. I only edit for reasonable length clips.
Again, the fact that the relevant 9/11 portion is 9:11 into the video – being that I created this video from scratch – is beyond what I can put into words. Houston Skywatch does not typically do this type of work, and so, it’s very bizarre to me to say the least.
it actually begins at 9:09….just sayin
and really, you don’t even begin talking about 9/11 stuff until about 10:00.
over-exaggerate much?
Seriously, I think you’re over exaggerating about the fact that I very well may have overly exaggerated!!! And now, I am over exaggerating about the fact that you’re over exaggerating the idea that I may have over exaggerated! And we wonder why there is a conspiracy! That’s insanity! Welcome to Before its News!
You must realize – this sort of work takes solid DAYS worth of work, editing, recording the audio, doing my real astronomy work at the same time, etc. and so, after all of that – when I finally go and upload the video (took over nine hours to upload this (or for Youtube bots or persons to decide this was an acceptable piece of footage ….) and then it’s pointed out to me that if you goto 9:11 seconds into the clip – it’s Part 3 which is what covers the 9/11 info. I was like, WOW!! How in the world did that happen… I mean, it’s incredible. WHAT are the chances. I went back and for me, at 9:11 seconds, it is “part 3″ right on the money.
Maybe I’m just trying to encode hidden gematria and numerology subconsciously programmed into my clips though, eh? 3+6=9 and 6-3=9 and so that equals 6! And if you add 2 more 6′s, that’s 666. Which, well, we know what that means. (just so I’m not over exaggerating, that’s a joke.)
Interesting article, I’ve checked out the WayBackMachine for various news web sites, including UK newspapers, bbc news, Pravda.ru etc etc and none of them were archived during the 9/11 timeframe.
interesting, thanks. never mind the picky pickersons with the time thing.
it is cool that it started at 911.