(Before It's News)
Donald Trump used naked bigotry and obvious racism to win the presidency. His slogan “Make America great again” was a promise to further lift up white Americans by placing their feet even more firmly on the necks and shoulders of black and brown people. This was one of the most obvious themes of Trump’s campaign strategy. It resonated to great effect among Trump’s resentful and spiteful white voters.
Trump’s strategy could not have been so effective, however, if a solid foundation had not already been present. What some social scientist have called the “white racial frame” has dominated American society for almost 400 years. As detailed by sociologist Joe Feagin, the white racial frame “is a generic meaning system that rationalizes the system of material oppression.”
The white racial frame has long been propagated and held by most white Americans — and even, in part, accepted by many people of color. . . . By constantly using selected bits of the dominant racial frame to interpret society, by integrating new items into it, and by applying its stereotypes, images, and interpretations in many discriminatory actions, whites imbed their racialized frame deeply in their minds.
In practice, the white racial frame consists of racial stereotypes, a presumptive belief in the natural superiority of white European-American society, a widespread denial that racism exists or is an important factor in society and an assumption that white people are “normal,” “innocent” and possess good intentions.
The white racial frame reinforces the supreme value of white people’s lives in American society. By implication and direct action the white racial frame diminishes the value and worth placed on the lives of black and brown Americans.
While the white racial frame may be omnipresent in American society and life, even by those standards, the recent days and weeks have seen some striking examples of its power. Here are a few:
1. White people who are addicted to opiates and other drugs should be treated with compassion and empathy.
Tales of drug-addicted white people have been prime fodder for human interest stories. For example, CNN recently profiled Kraig Moss, a man who became a celebrity of sorts for attending 45 Donald Trump campaign rallies in an effort to call attention to how heroin addiction killed his son. Other major news outlets and programs such as “60 Minutes” have done extensive profiles about white America’s heroin and painkiller epidemic.
Prescription pain pill and opiate addiction is much more common among white people than it is among African-Americans and Hispanics. Drug abuse by white Americans is so widespread that some Republicans were even afraid to repeal the Affordable Care Act because of how such a decision would negatively affect their constituents’ ability to access rehabilitation centers and other care.
2. Oh the humanity! The “white working class” is dying.
In a much discussed 2015 article, Princeton University professors Anne Case and Angus Deaton documented a dramatic increase in the mortality rates of lower-income white Americans ages 45 to 54. They are dying from “the deaths of despair,” a term meant to encompass suicide, overdose and other deaths related to substance abuse or mental illness.
Julia Belluz of Vox explained the dynamic this way: “Along with worsening job prospects over the past several decades, this group has seen their chances of a stable marriage and family decline, along with their overall health. To manage their despair about the gap between their hopes and what’s come of their lives, they’ve often turned to drugs, alcohol, and suicide.”
This increase in the death rates of millions of middle-aged white Americans who lack a college degree, something that is especially dramatic compared with those in affluent European countries, has been compared to the results a war or the spread of a virulent infectious disease. Although some prominent social scientists have disagreed with the methodology and interpretation of the data, the claim that the “white working class” is dying at record rates is now accepted as a given by many policymakers and journalists.
The power of the “white working class is suffering” narrative is so great that it was one of the dominant frameworks — however incorrect it may be — used to explain Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
Public discussion of the supposed mass extinction-level event facing the white working class has been highly racialized. Language that sounds an alarm about how the life expectancy for some white people is on a downward slide and may converge with that for African-Americans is a reaffirmation of white privilege. When taken in total, the social status of black and brown people is at a basement level, to which white Americans as a group must not be allowed to fall. In their new paper “Mortality and Morbidity in the 21st Century,” Case and Denton elaborated on this:
The historian Carol Anderson argued in an interview in Politico (2016) that for whites “if you’ve always been privileged, equality begins to look like oppression,” and contrasts the pessimism among whites with the “sense of hopefulness, that sense of what America could be, that has been driving black folks for centuries.” That hopefulness is consistent with the much lower suicide rates among blacks, but beyond that, while suggestive, it is hard to confront such accounts with the data.
One theory about what is causing rising mortality among whites is the “dashed expectations” hypothesis. According to Johns Hopkins University sociologist Andrew Cherlin, whites today are more pessimistic than their forebears about their opportunities to advance in life. They are also more pessimistic than their black and Hispanic contemporaries.
“The idea that today’s generations will do better than their parents’ generation is part of the American Dream. It has always been true until now,” Cherlin said. “It may still be true for college-educated Americans, but not for the high-school-educated people we used to call the working class.”
Cherlin said whites benefited from discriminatory hiring when the working class was built over much of the past century. Union jobs tended to go to whites, he said, and labor contracts protected them until the unions lost power and jobs went overseas.
“Whites had a privileged place in the blue-collar economy,” he said. And as the middle of the labor market disappeared, so did that historic white privilege.
African-Americans die younger than white Americans. Communities of color are victims of what has been called “medical apartheid,” in which they have worse access to health care of a lower quality. There is no mass public outcry about this reality. America’s political elites have not declared the disparate health outcomes faced by black and brown people to be a national crisis. Why? For the white racial frame, the suffering of black and brown people is a feature of the system and not a bug or an aberration.
3. What are we to do! The white family is in crisis.
There has been a flurry of recent research on this phenomenon, including books by the infamous Charles Murray (who wrote the white supremacist tract “The Bell Curve” in 1994) as well as work by such respected scholars as Robert Putnam, Arlie Hochschild and Nancy Isenberg.
The consensus is clear: Millions of white Americans are facing a serious crisis in intergenerational mobility, educational attainment, criminality, family cohesion and finding gainful employment. While the black and brown “ghetto underclass” is labeled as “pathological” and perhaps even possessed of “bad genes,” white communities under stress are viewed as facing structural challenges that white elites should address. (See Donald Trump’s already broken promises to the “forgotten Americans.”) To the degree that poor whites are in fact stigmatized in America, it is often because their behavior is seen through the white racial frame as being closer to that of “urban” and “ghetto blacks” than to “normal” white people’s behavior.
The golden rule of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” should be a principle of public policy — and not just a lesson taught to children that they conveniently forget when they grow up. Unfortunately, white political and social elites have learned how to play a skillful game of divide and conquer by encouraging white Americans en masse to not feel any positive sense of linked destiny with people of color. A society that only cares about the pain and struggles faced by white people and ignores those experienced by people of color can never be a true democracy. The sooner that white Americans learn this basic lesson of good citizenship, the better off the entire country will be.
Source:
http://www.chaunceydevega.com/2017/03/sorry-white-america-i-will-not.html
1. Point to any statement of the President or his 2016 campaign about “lifting up white Americans by placing their feet on the necks and shoulders of black and brown people.”
When you make something up like that, it’s called a “lie.” It doesn’t even make sense.
2. Your prescription drugs link has people asking for compassion for prescription drug addicts. (You’re thinking they’re white.) I’m compassionate, if they got addicted after using them for medical reasons.
If you’re suggesting they don’t get prosecuted for prescription fraud, you’re lying, again. People get prosecuted for this all the time. Here is one example: http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/20160405/woman-faces-70-counts-in-prescription-fraud-case
Here is the law and a couple of examples: https://www.federalcharges.com/prescription-drug-fraud-laws-charges/
Here is information about policies: http://www.nsc.org/RxDrugOverdoseDocuments/Prescription-Nation-2016-American-Drug-Epidemic.pdf
Notice: prescription guidelines, prescription monitoring programs, and “pill mill” legislation. All of that is about prosecuting doctors who supply addicts.
Your link also refers to the early release of some federal “non-violent drug offenders.” Again, you’re making false assumptions about who they are and why they are in prison.
The New York Times again: “It coincides with an intensifying bipartisan effort to ease the mass incarcerations that followed decades of tough sentencing for drug offenses — like dealing crack cocaine — which have taken a particularly harsh toll on minority communities.” https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/us/us-to-release-6000-inmates-under-new-sentencing-guidelines.html
3. The working class did not suddenly become illiterate, or criminal. The working class is suffering from lack of jobs, and low wage jobs. And the evidence for that is all over. Average age of cars on the road. Numbers who qualify for SNAP. Etc.
Point to any evidence of whites having “a privileged place in the blue collar economy.”
Whites are discriminated against, by affirmative action in employment testing, employment, college admission, and by EEOC quotas. Here’s an example of the EEOC demanding race-based hiring of blacks: EEOC v. McCormick & Schmick. “EEOC had alleged that the nationwide seafood restaurant chain refused to hire African Americans into positions that would interact with the public– known as “front-of-the-house” positions-at its Baltimore restaurants. The case involved approximately 200 individuals.” https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/american_experiences/african_americans.cfm
That’s only one example of law that views jobs as entitlements, and that reserves a percentage of jobs for minorities.
THAT is privilege. Being a majority of the population, and a majority of the work force, is not privilege.
4. You tell ME why 1.4 million blacks from Africa, recent immigrants to the US, are considerably more prosperous than African-Americans. Scroll down to household income: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/04/09/chapter-1-statistical-portrait-of-the-u-s-black-immigrant-population/
I could tell you it’s the same reason the average white person is more prosperous. Academic achievement and obeying the law. Employment opportunity is lost when people drop out of school, or never learn to read or write, and when they commit crimes.
IQ does matter. Here you go:
Psychologists David Hambrick and Christopher Chabris:
“The content of the SAT is practically indistinguishable from that of standardized intelligence tests that social scientists use to study individual differences, and that psychologists and psychiatrists use to determine whether a person is intellectually disabled—and even whether a person should be spared execution in states that have the death penalty. Scores on the SAT correlate very highly with scores on IQ tests—so highly that the Harvard education scholar Howard Gardner, known for his theory of multiple intelligences, once called the SAT and other scholastic measures ‘thinly disguised intelligence tests.’
“The SAT is good at predicting college success and great when paired with high school performance, they say, citing reams of statistics that they claim are overwhelming. And that’s because it measures general intelligence.”
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/04/22/sat-revamp-stirs-iq-and-genes-debate-roiling-egalitarian-sensibilities/
YOUR headline should say, “Sorry Black America, I Cannot Re-Distribute Intelligence.” http://www.rense.com/general79/dut.htm
And here are some of the reasons for the “mass incarceration” of blacks, which brought down our crime rate. Until recently.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/tables/table-43