Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
The UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development presents itself as a plan for achieving peace, prosperity and equality, as well as sustainable development, and these are certainly worthy goals. But are they the UN’s true goals?
Governments around the world routinely and with increasing transparency lie to promote hidden agendas, as evidenced by actions that are at odds with their words. If the UN is truly pursuing its stated goals, its words will be supported by its actions. So, what actions or methods will be used in implementing its plan, and are those actions in harmony with its stated goals?
The method that will achieve the UN’s stated goals is to encourage voluntary cooperation among people and nations based on individual realization that honesty, goodwill and harmlessness in all interpersonal and planetary relations is the best way forward. Peace, prosperity, equality and sustainability are the natural and automatic outer effects of these inner attitudes. This is the spiritual path, the higher path, the path of recognizing that outer circumstances are an inevitable reflection of an inner state of consciousness. This path allows individuals the liberty to experiment and to experience the results of their actions, both good and bad, neither shielding them from the adverse consequences of their mistakes nor denying them the rewards of good decisions. Those who harm others through theft, fraud, negligence, and violent aggression are held accountable for their actions and required to make restitution, but beyond that, individuals are left free to live their lives as they choose. This is the method by which individuals develop and increase their own capacity for responsible, wise living. Lasting change in society as a whole is built on this kind of intelligent and voluntary change at an individual level.
The alternative method of trying to reach the UN’s goals is through the use of external force. This path attempts to change outer circumstances without regard for the inner consciousness. Like using pharmaceuticals to mask the symptoms of disease while doing nothing to correct the underlying problem, it’s a superficial and temporary fix, and as such it’s a lie. This is the materialistic path, the lower path, the path of evil. This path uses violence to force conformist behavior and discourage independent thought and experimentation. It distorts natural feedback mechanisms, often rewarding unproductive, wasteful and destructive behavior while punishing their opposite. This method stunts personal growth and produces irresponsible, unthinking, enslaved individuals who are easily manipulated by a ruling class.
The UN is using idealism to persuade countries to voluntarily support its agenda, giving the appearance of using the spiritual method of implementing its plan, but what happens when it has brought everyone into the room and locked the door? How will its plans actually be carried out?
For the most part, the 2030 document is vague about the method to be used in achieving its goals, but Goal 17 finally gives a clear indication of how the financial resources that are acknowledged as essential to realizing the agenda will be obtained, and it indicates in no uncertain terms which of the two methods the UN has chosen to use. Goal 17.1 is to “Strengthen domestic resource mobilization . . . to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection.” Put simply, they intend to use force to take the money they want.
The Addis Ababa Action Agenda of 27 July 2015 is referenced numerous times as “an integral part of the 2030 Agenda”, and it’s far more specific about this issue. Here’s a sample:
22. We commit to enhancing revenue administration through modernized, progressive tax systems, improved tax policy and more efficient tax collection. We will work to improve the. . . efficiency and effectiveness of our tax systems, including by broadening the tax base. . . . We welcome efforts by countries to set nationally defined domestic targets and timelines for enhancing domestic revenue. . . and will support developing countries in need in reaching these targets.
23. We will also reduce opportunities for tax avoidance. . . . We will make sure that all companies, including multinationals, pay taxes to the Governments of countries where economic activity occurs. . . .
28. We stress that efforts in international tax cooperation should be universal in approach and scope. . .
30. We will strengthen national control mechanisms, such as supreme audit institutions. . . .
Taxation is forcible confiscation of the product of an individual’s labor under threat of harm if the individual resists. It’s the equivalent of putting a gun to someone’s head and saying, “Give me your money or else”. When done by a private individual such an act is recognized as criminal extortion, but when done by governments it somehow becomes acceptable, or so they would have us believe. By claiming it’s for the common good, they hope to obscure the reality that it’s a predatory and violent act of theft.
The seemingly gleeful willingness to use coercion to obtain financing for the UN’s agenda is a clear indication that force will be used to implement other aspects of their plan as well. By using theft and violence to implement their agenda, and not relying on peaceful, voluntary cooperation, they demonstrate that they either are ignorant of the truer values or that their stated goals are a deception.
In initially seeking voluntary support it seems they are aware of the truer values, and it’s highly unlikely they are ignorant that coercion can produce only a transitory success, given that throughout history tyranny has always met with ultimate failure. Therefore, it appears their stated agenda is a deliberate effort to deceive and distract us with a pretense of idealistic goals as they pursue their true agenda of implementing a global police state over a uniformly impoverished populace who are forced into servitude to those in governance positions. Such a condition cannot last; the spiritual impulse to exercise individual free will has always, in the end, overcome the evil of forced servitude and slavery, but it seems those who control the UN are quite willing to do whatever it takes to satisfy their lust for power and wealth, even if success lasts only a short time.
If the UN truly intended to achieve its stated goals, the single most effective step it could take would be to ensure that the simple and basic law against theft is applied equally and without exception. With that one action fractional reserve banking and fiat currency would be abolished, the fraudulent Federal Reserve, IMF and World Bank would be eliminated, production and consumption of resources would rebalance at sustainable levels as we return to the use of honest money (following a period of very painful but necessary readjustment), extreme wealth imbalances would disappear, and governments would be denied the resources to conduct war and would be limited to providing truly useful and productive services that people would voluntarily purchase.
Unfortunately, such a world does not appeal to those who desire extreme wealth and power. As long as the UN is willing to use coercion in pursuit of its goals, it demonstrates that the lust for power predominates among those who control it.
The UN’s tactics bring to mind the image of Nazi prisoners walking willingly into a room in the expectation of having a pleasant shower, and instead finding themselves locked in a lethal gas chamber. Think carefully before supporting the UN agenda.