| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
School Shooting: 6 Injured 1 Dead First Reports UPDATE: 2 Dead 3 in Surgery (Video)
By Josey Wales
UPDATE: A school shooting has been reported at Marysville-Pilchuck High School in Marysville, Washington, just north of Seattle. Two students are confirmed dead, including the shooter and three others are in surgery for head wounds.
The Marysville School District released this statement:
“The Marysville Pilchuck High School is currently in lock down due to an emergency situation. Police and emergency services have responded. The Marysville School District lock down procedures will remain in effect at Pilchuck until further notice from law enforcement. We will continue to forward communication in cooperation with law enforcement.
Students who attend MPHS campus are being relocated to the Shoultes Community Church at the corner of 116th and 51st Street. Buses will take students home from there. Those parents in the area wanting to pick up their child will need to go to the church location and sign out their child out with school administrator or law enforcement.
All after-school activities across the district are canceled today.”
Early report are that 6 Student have been injured in this shooting. There are unconfirmed reports that the shooter has died.
A media briefing was scheduled for shortly after noon.
FBI agents were assisting local police.
CNN Report:
UPDATE: It seems that new information has been brought to the fore front, Washington state has a major gun control bill up for vote in November, the measure is to close to call. Well until today?
Stealth Gun Control Initiative Too Close To Call In Washington State
Washington state’s I-594 has massive money pouring into it, because it’s apparently the only gun-control measure on the ballot this fall anywhere across the country. There are actually two dueling gun measures in the state.
The first one, I-594, the Washington Universal Background Checks for Gun Purchases Initiative, is being bankrolled by billionaires on the left in favor of gun control, including anti-gun activist and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, as well as former wealthy Microsoft execs Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. Thanks to them, the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility hasraised nearly $9 million for the initiative this far, massively outspending the other side, which has raised only $1.3 million.
I-594 has been cleverly drafted to sound like it merely makes small changes to gun laws, not a flat-out ban or gun registration scheme. This is why it is so dangerous. People are less likely to oppose it; in fact, polls show that even a majority of gun owners – 54 percent of the 35 percent of Washington residents who own a gun – are in favor of it.
The reality is, the bizarrely-long 18.5 page initiative is so confusingly and vaguely worded- with many terms and phrases left undefined – that former Washington State Supreme Court Justice Richard Sanders warned protesters at a rally against I-594 how impossible it will be to comply with. Gun owners will easily make honest mistakes, making it easy to prosecute them. Many will just give up trying to own a gun.
State Rep. Jason Overstreet (R-Lynden) hinted to those attending the protest that the initiative had been written vaguely and confusingly on purpose. If passed, it will be subject to the state department of licensing – unelected government bureaucrats – to draft rules interpreting and defining it later (as oppressively as they’d like).
Alan Gottlieb, who founded the Second Amendment Foundation and chairs the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, compares it to Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s attitude about Obamacare, “pass it so you can find out what’s in it.”
I-594 is an unfunded mandate that would prevent gun owners from transferring – or even loaning – their guns to a family member (unless a gift), private party, friend or anyone else. Instead, all transfers would be required to go through a dealer for a background check.
Gun ranges would no longer be able to loan out guns – with only a narrow exception for guns that are stored at the range or for youth training. There is a vaguely worded “temporary transfer” provision, but the language is subject to interpretation, not defined in the initiative.
Bearing Arms warns, “I-594 would make the common practice of trying out another friend’s rifle, pistol, or shotgun, illegal. It would make it illegal for a grandfather to give his daughter a firearm to defend herself and her grandchildren from an abusive ex-husband.” Sanders further questioned, “Why can I give my mother a firearm but cannot sell her or loan her one?”
Everyday citizen Jason Colberg debates WA State Senator Maralyn Chase on the pros & cons of Initiative 594.
This debate took place on October 19th at Richmond Beach Congregational Church.
As you can see it’s an on going debate with citizens against millionaires. Of course the shooter is dead?
Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!
.jpg)
I-594, the biggest gun control initiative of the year will be voted on in the upcoming election Washington state. This would be a good way to try and persuade some votes.
The Police commander just lied, He said that they’ve done training, but he doesn’t remember when, try today. Look at the link.
http://www.legitgov.org/graphics/marysville_SWAT_training_then_shooting.jpg
The whole concept of living in a Republic is that other people can not simply vote your unalienable rights away. That being said the law would be unconstitutional anyway any one trying to enforce the new fake law would be subject to this:
Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
(iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
See below and quit thinking other aholes can vote your second amendment rights away.
Governments Have Descended to the Level
of
Mere Private Corporations
Supreme Court Building
Clearfield Doctrine
Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-
371 1942
Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v.
United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: “Governments descend to the level of a mere
private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where
private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is
concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
entities entirely separate from government.”
What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by
corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
different than a mere private corporation.
As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private
corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific
performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government,
like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other
commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific
performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial
agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called
statutes.
This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED
STATES CORPORATIOON COMPANY filed its “CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION” in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER
the ‘corporate government’ agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the
FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use
today.
References:
(i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-
company.pdf
(ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-
work-by-judge-dale.pdf
[4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to
conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate
or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS,
which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of
Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did
you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes?
For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued
for violating their corporate regulations?
[8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
(iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/