Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By View From Falling Downs
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The uses of “news”

Monday, July 30, 2012 3:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

It’s safe to assume that the big dogs in the world of news and commentary spend at least as much time perusing global news feeds as I do. One would like to think they spend even more.

That’s why whenever some pip-squeak blogger has a “scoop” it’s not because they’ve got a hyper-sensitive ear to the ground; it’s because the BBC/Jazeera/Reuters universe has chosen to ignore the story.

Case in point; the Reuters “exclusive” the other day about the “nerve center” in Turkey from which the Syrian uprising is being managed. It is utterly inconceivable that the newsheads at Reuters just stumbled over that story this week.

You can be sure that along with anyone else who follows events they’ve been aware of that “secret” nerve center for the better part of the past year. Why do they choose to make it “news” at this time, and not before?

Not only is the supposedly secret nerve center not news, but the fact that American-sponsored advocacy groups have been busy on the ground in Syria for years fomenting this spontaneous rebellion isn’t news either. That’s a story that the big dogs haven’t got around to telling much of yet.

I think that the reason some of this is coming out now is that almost a year and a half into this spontaneous uprising official circles have recognized that things aren’t going according to the script. On the one hand, Assad has proven to be a lot more resilient than was expected. Not so much Assad personally, but the power structure around him.

We hear constantly about high-level defections. At various times entire armored units have supposedly defected, but for some reason we never see them turn their armor on the regime.

The other issue causing second thoughts is that our rebellion (and this is “our” rebellion, make no mistake) has to a large extent been hijacked, on the ground, by radical Islamists. That takes away the rationale for trying to replace Assad with a more US-friendly, Israel-friendly, and Exxon-friendly regime.

So we are seeing a shift in the reportage on the Syrian rebellion. Maybe Assad isn’t such a bad apple after all…



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.