‘The EU Does Not Meet the Requirements of a Nobel Peace Laureate’

The Norwegian Nobel Prize committee has again decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize award to a recipient with the intention to encourage the awardee to work for peace, rather than to reward an accomplishment.

The European Union was by its founders seen as a peace organization, but has since done little to promote peace or to achieve disarmament. Most important, the EU has not at all worked to diminish the greatest threat to mankind: nuclear war.

Two of the dominant members of the EU are nuclear weapon states, which have shown no intention to work to prevent a nuclear Armageddon. The EU has rather discouraged work by its member states against nuclear weapons.

The two European countries who have been most active for nuclear abolition, Switzerland and Norway, are not members of the EU.

Choosing Politicians Not Peace Researchers 

The Nobel Peace Prize committee members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.

The Parliament has chosen to appoint mostly politicians. Maybe that is the reason the members keep rewarding politicians and political organisations.

There should be members from peace research institutes, peace organisations, and respected non-political members of the community.

The European Union does not meet the requirements of a Nobel Peace laureate, according to the testament of Alfred Nobel, the one who shall have done the most or the best work for brotherhood between peoples, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the promotion of peace congresses.

*Gunnar Westbergar’s article was published on International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), a non-partisan federation of national medical organizations in 62 countries, representing tens of thousands of doctors, medical students, other health workers, and concerned citizens who share the common goal of creating a more peaceful and secure world freed from the threat of nuclear annihilation. Go to Original. 

IPPNW was founded in 1980 by physicians from the United States and the former Soviet Union who shared a common commitment to the prevention of nuclear war between their two countries. Citing the first principal of the medical profession—that doctors have an obligation to prevent what they cannot treat—a global federation of physician experts came together to explain the medical and scientific facts about nuclear war to policy makers and to the public, and to advocate for the elimination of nuclear weapons from the world’s arsenals. IPPNW received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985.

Read also:

Books: “The Path to Zero: Dialogues on Nuclear Dangers”

“Breaking the Nuclear Chain” Campaign

Pressure to Push the Nuclear Genie Back in the Bottle

World Nuclear Forces: ‘Fewer But Newer’ Weapons

Watch The Sky–It May Rain Atomic Bombs 

Desert “Star Wars”, Respect Dignity of Life

Nuclear Dangers, The World Is “One Minute Closer to Midnight”

Scottish Nuclear Weapons – What If…?

Global Ban on Nuclear Tests ‘Vital’ – UN

U.S. Spending on Atomic Bombs Doubles UN Budget

Of Dr. Strangelove and the Risk of Using Atomic Bombs

World Campain Against False ‘Nuclear Deterrence Doctrine’ 

The Story of Child Yami and the Atomic Bomb 

‘Making Peace with the Cookie Monster’

Middle East Nuclear Free Bid Moves to Finland – Yet Another Lost Chance?

Nuclear Free Middle East “High Priority”

Nuclear Free Middle East — Necessary Yet Impossible

Netanyahu Calls for ‘Red Line’ for Action on Iran

‘Strong UN Commitment’ to Nuclear-free Middle East Conference

Obama and How to Save a Quarter of a Trillion Dollars

You Choose: $105 Billion a Year for Health Care or Nuclear Weapons?

2012 Human Wrongs Watch

2012-10-13 04:00:23

Source: http://human-wrongs-watch.net/2012/10/13/14284/