Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

“Children’s Rights Amendment” Warning!

Sunday, November 4, 2012 13:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

“Children’s Rights Amendment” Warning:  Keep away from children with special needs and children whose parents have special needs. “Alert” Amendment 31 deletes Article 42.5. “In exceptional cases, where the parents for physical or moral reasons fail in their duty towards their children, the State as guardian of the common good, by appropriate means shall endeavour to supply the place of the parents, but always with due regard for the natural and imprescriptibly rights of the child. “ The State has fought this article in the courts (and lost!) because it places absolute (not subject to available resources) obligation on the State to help children in need “by appropriate means” (according to the needs of the child not according to the whim of the State). This wonderful constitutional provision acknowledges two kinds of parental failure, “moral” (abuse, cruelty, negligence)  and “physical” that is a shortfall that is not the parent’s fault but due to some condition beyond their control for example, the disability of the parent or child, illness of either, poverty, homelessness, etc. Art. 42.5 demand an “appropriate” response in helping the child who is being “failed”. In abuse this will obviously mean protecting the child from the abuser and helping the child to heal from the abuse. But in situations of “failure” of caring parents for “physical reasons” an appropriate response means support and services for the child and the family in the form of therapy, treatment, healthcare, home help, supplementary payments, respite, etc. The Sinnott Judgment building on O’Donoghue forced the State to acknowledge its duty to provide appropriate education for all children with special needs; article 42.5 played a key role in winning this judgment. Any shortfall in education, healthcare and services that children experience is not the fault of the present constitutional wording which robustly defends every child. Rather any denial of appropriate services is the result of state negligence of its duties. The state are now asking us to delete Article 42.5 and with it the States obligation to help children in need appropriately. We have fought long and hard through the courts for our children’s rights. Don’t let the state off the hook! Vote NO on November 10th.

referendum and children with special needs.docx 100K   View   Download

2012-11-04 13:01:31

Source: http://www.oneworldchronicle.com/?p=7549



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.