PAPER – Liberalism Rooted In the Garden (PPSIMMONS Exclusive)
By Chris Farrell
The division within the Republican party is spiritual in nature. Many so-called Christian conservatives who are said to be on the right have bought into the Liberal-socialist left’s worldview’s creation paradigm which, at its root, denies the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights and elevates Man, or more specifically certain elite men, above mere mortals to a ruling position of dominion and authority.
It was the adaptation by Hegel of the ‘Darwinian’ theory of evolution—existent long before Mr. Darwin popularized it—to literary textual criticism, and especially the textual criticism of biblical texts, which spawned the Graf-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis, an hypothesis based upon conjecture and pre-supposition and outright fabrications such as the purported J/E/P/D structure of supposed source documents for which not a single scrap of evidence exists, (see Evidence That Demands a Verdict’ by Josh McDowell, Volumes I and II), and it was the Graf-Wellhausen documentarians who spawned the complete spectrum of blind radical historical-critical schools of textual criticism: Form Criticism, “Modern” Criticism, Source Criticism, Radical Criticism, Liberal Criticism, “Progressive” Criticism, etc. ad nauseum.
Therein lay the roots of liberal theology which denies the authority of Scripture and provides the excuse for its proponents to advance ‘Forward’ blindly in sin.
”For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Professing to be wise, they became fools.
and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves,
who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever, Amen.
For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.
Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;
being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evilmindedness, they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
undiscerning, untrustworthy, un-loving, unforgiving, unmerciful;
who knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1:18-32. Spirit Filled Life Bible. Pg. 1688-89.)
Liberal “theologians” first ask rhetorically, just like the serpent in the Garden, “Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1), and then they go about attempting to prove by way of their indefensible methods of textual criticism that God really did not say, or convey in His Word, precisely what is written. Mind you, pay close attention to what the Serpent did. He not only questioned whether God had said something, but he twisted the actual command God had given, for God had not commanded that Man not eat “…of every tree of the garden…,’ but only of the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil.
Then liberal “theologians” proceed to insert into their contrived developmental theories which they assert as reality surrounding the compilation of the texts assembled within the Bible man’s motives behind the authorship of the texts within, as they say, man’s Sitz en Leben, (any given contemporaneous and colloquial historical social setting.)
The liberal “theologians” then maintain that man, or certain elite men to be more specific, Sociologically defined as “Master Thinkers” or as Bastiat facetiously called them “Supermen,” purportedly endowed with greater mental and spiritual capacities by what power they do not say, with a Sociologically described Verstehen, (higher knowledge, superhuman insight, i.e. γνώσίς), men who have embraced the second part of Satan’s original lie as truth and believe that they are superior beings—who believe that they can be like gods, (“For God doth know, that in the day ye eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened: and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:5, Webster’s Bible Translation)), wrote the Bible according to the liberal’s undefined construct of a “community’s” situational needs when the respective biblical texts were penned—situational needs which change over time as do contemporaneous situational ethics.
Everything to the liberal is relative including morality to time and place, yet they cannot answer rationally from whence their relative morality originates. They have very convenient situational ethics that they themselves—self-proclaimed elite, enigmatically gifted with great new insight “Master Thinkers,” gods unto themselves—can modify according to their will and justify in their own hearts and minds by whatsoever situational crisis they choose to use to justify their morality du jour.
Liberal-socialism is nothing more than revived Gnosticism or neo-gnosticism. “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” (King James Bible “Authorized Version”, Pure Cambridge Edition.)
Micro-biologists and those working on unraveling the phenomenal complexity of the “simplest” cells are rapidly crushing the Darwinian evolutionists faith in life emerging from pools of materials suspended in water under mountains of evidence which prove such an hypothesis as irrational. The complexity of DNA defies the possibility of it ever in googles of bazillions of years of having organized itself into the apparent quad-code structure that is observed within its incomprehensibly intelligent design.
Sociology codifies many of the doctrines and tenets of the religion/philosophical ideology/worldview of Liberal-Socialism, or Liberalism, which has a Secular-humanist branch and a Theistic-evolutionary branch.
The Secular-humanist branch maintains that everything that exists resulted long ago when nothing—for nothing existed—went “Bang!” and Voila!—everything that is came into existence. Secular-humanism is solipsistic on its surface.
Theistic-evolution is far more deceitful for it permits Liberal-socialists to claim to be Christian while they simultaneously reject God’s written Word’s creation narrative. The majority of people in America today believe in the hundreds of millions of years assertions as opposed to the biblical account of creation.
The pressing need for Liberalism to reject Jesus Christ as Creator is why Mr. Obama found it necessary to again and again deliberately omit the word ‘Creator’ from his quotes from our nation’s founding documents. The one thing that unites Liberal-socialists and Muslims is their determination to deny that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ, with certain unalienable rights including the right to life, (all men would of course include unborn babies,) and the right to liberty, (not to be confused with hedonistic licentiousness.)
Until America returns to biblical standards of righteousness and the Christian Church in America adamantly refutes the infiltration of the liberal “theology” into the Church and puts out that which it has up to now put up with there is no hope for our nation recovering from the dismal situation in which she presently finds herself. America’s problems are fundamentally spiritual in nature.
Recognition by Americans of the ‘rule of the Creator,’ the Lord Jesus of the Bible, the Christ, is an imperative if we are to have hope that God would bless America as ‘We the People’ sometimes prayerfully sing.
If Americans do not recognize as Creator the Lord Jesus of the Bible, (not to be confused with the myriad other Jesus’s within innumerable cults today), and as Source of the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed—a recognition so plainly seen by the Founders of this nation that they found it to be a self-evident truth—then it is only a natural political progression for them to attribute those unalienable rights to another source, even ‘another Jesus’—to identify those rights as originating somewhere other than from an immutable, eternal, omniscient, Holy God, Creator of all that is.
‘Big government’ “progressive,” Liberal-socialists will, quite naturally, gravitate towards an ideology which determines Man’s unalienable rights as originating from…, you guessed it, …the state.
More insidious, in so far as it is less obvious, is the natural gravitation of the so-called ‘conservative,’ so-called ‘Christian’ right who, a majority of the time, assume an accommodating, unbiblical ideological position which corresponds to recognition of the Liberal’s substitutionary source from whence all men’s rights emanate. The so-called ‘Conservative Christian right’ too embraces the Liberal’s creatively constructed, imaginary alternative from where the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed by their Creator may falsely be asserted to have originated.
This advances of the Liberal-socialist left into the camp of the Christian conservative right has been achieved through the employment of the Hegelian dialectic, a modern application of the first part of Satan’s original dualistic lie: ‘Did God Really?’ Just as our greatest grandmother synthesized an untruth into what God had actually said in her response to the Serpent, the Hegelian dialectic requires a synthesis of a lie with the truth…, the antithesis mixed with a truthful thesis arriving at a synthesis. The so-called Conservative Christian right has been incrementally moved further and further away from the Truth in God’s Word unto the unsure footing—the shifting sands—of today’s Republican platform –without reliance upon God. Americans used to trust in God. The one-time Christian conservative Republican right has been deceived just as Eve was in the Garden when she augmented the truth with a lie in her response to the Serpent.
In doing so, so-called Christian conservatives within the Republican party facilitate the deterioration of the recognition of the unalienable quality of the rights men have been endowed with by their Creator proportionally to the degree to which they too concur with the Liberal-socialist left in denying the Creator, reducing those unalienable rights to a level of retractability as demonstrated by, for example, the passing of the NDAA by members of BOTH parties.
If the ‘creative community’ concept of the religion of Liberalism determines the rights that men are endowed with to be one thing at one moment in time—and it does—but another at some later period in time, then no man is justified, according to Liberal-socialist dogma, to question the moral parameters which Liberal legislator community organizer ‘superhero’ leaders do at any given moment determined to be acceptable. To do so would be intolerant! Does the immense hypocrisy and insanity of the proponents of Liberalism’s solipsistic ‘reasoning’ yet stand out for the reader to see? Liberalism is delusional; it is a mental disorder and a manifestation of spiritual illness.
Amazingly, for lack of any sound argument to defend said alternate source to the Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ, which the so-called Christian conservative right has embraced, the nominal Christian conservative right turns away from the Bible to the same illegitimately constructed concepts of the Liberal left’s perversions of political correctness, tolerance, pluralism, inclusiveness, multi-culturalism, unity, diversity, etc…, etc…, as the moral foundation upon which to attempt to justify their neo-conservative political posture and qualify, according to whatever contemporaneous position upon the continuum of morally relativistic postures they should at any time determine that the rest of us should accept as truth, the extension of certain anything-but-unalienable rights unto all men—some men more than others actually—instead—of returning to the simplicity of the Gospel of Jesus Christ upon which this Christian nation, exceptional in all of human history, was founded and has been so richly blessed by God.
Resorting to the morally relative, currently popular Liberal perversions of the concepts of political correctness, tolerance, pluralism, inclusiveness, diversity, multi-culturalism, unity, etc…, upon which to base one’s ideological principles and laws establishes those principles, embraced as beliefs, upon shifting sands of moral relativism and too relegates the pronouncement of just what contemporaneously popular version of said Liberal concepts shall be acceptable at any given time in the future to whomsoever within the Liberal construct of a “community”, within their sociologically purported ‘Sitz en Leben,’ happens to be in leadership position—the ‘superhero’ du jour so to speak—to re-define as they see fit to re-define within their accommodatingly self-described ‘Sitz en Leben,’ whatever they wish to define as the prevailing “Zeitgeist,” or spirit of the age. This permits adherents to the religion of Liberalism to re-define standards of morality according to the lusts of their hearts. Liberalism’s so-called ‘Zeitgeist,’ their “spirit of the age” is the spirit of the anti-christ.
The liberal’s “superhero” community organizer/legislator leaders must at each and every step ‘Forward’ in time within the “progressive” Liberal-socialist “democratic” plan for America, according to their delusional, irrational “logic,” be extended the authority to dictate precisely what is or is not politically correct; is or is not to be tolerated; is or is not sufficiently pluralistic; is or is not adequately inclusive; is or is not acceptably multi-cultural; is or is not appropriately unified or diverse. Nota bene the word “dictate” in the last sentence and its relationship to the word ‘dictator!’
It is by means of employing the faulty radical historical-critical biblical textual criticism that liberal “theologians” attempt to justify the sin of homosexuality as biblically acceptable when nothing could be clearer in the Word of God than the fact that homosexuality is sin. The Liberal-socialist toleration of the sin of homosexuality as socially acceptable is most convenient for ‘Bath House Barry’ Soetoro, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel, otherwise known as Mr. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama, Jr. as well as on his mother’s passport, Soebarkah.
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding just who Barack’s real father is: Frank Marshall Davis? The man named Obama born in the British protectorate of East Africa now called Kenya? Malcolm X?
Satan started lying to us in the Garden and the Liberal-socialists continue with the work of their father to this day. John 8:44 reads, “You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and stayed not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (Topicalbible.org—AKJV.)
2013-02-24 13:19:09
Source: http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/02/paper-liberalism-rooted-in-garden.html
Source:
