Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

 

 

The problem with the kill shot as it is called is that it could well be a creditable threat. It is plausible that a massive solar flare a couple of orders of magnitude greater than ever encountered could cause serious damage. Yet we are close to transitioning our civilization into technological protocols that minimize the effect. By this I refer to the natural tying of modern tower living to agriculture. It would be simple to generate below ground refugia in a self sustaining tower with little impact on cost.

 

We are extremely vulnerable as long as our grid is used to distribute power. Yet we see that this is also likely to become reversed. Thus even an EMP pulse, as messy as it would be could be generally offset easily enough.

 

Beyond that remote viewing is out there and is been used to various ends. It naturally has been used to identify significant future events. The problem with that is that most such efforts in the past has consistently identified an end of everything situation. I suspect that this is mostly a reflection of the viewer’s individual death outcome rather than a meaningful prediction.

 

In my own case as a market ‘reader’, I have understood the eminence of a major market break several times. It gave me weeks to prepare for the 1987 break and left me unsurprised on 9/11. I did not know what the event would be but understood it was eminent. All that is easy to assign to intuition picking up conforming movement. Of course, acting on that type of cue is often contradicted by those actions.

 

I have no intuitive sense that such a threat is anyways eminent. I do think that planning for the risk of an EMP pulse as part of forward planning is appropriate and timely for our civilization because structures we are building can easily offset the risk as we can largely offset earth quake risk. They will also be around for centuries.

 

It will also become possible to create refugia underground as our technology advances. That is several decades away.

 

On a far more timely matter, he does predict that North Korea will use a nuclear bomb. North Korea must be confronted and forced into regime change and nuclear disarmament. That has been intellectually evident for some time. This type of prediction makes it emotionally evident. It is also doable.

MORE HERE

• wizard

  Your info is at least 20 years out of date.

  Mar 4, 2013, 10:41 pm 0 Reply