Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Where’s
the beef?
Two
years on, and no one has managed to find a collapsed or leaning building in
Sendai, the city hardest hit by a 9.0.
Sadly,
the original Sendai report has vanished from the web. In the new linked report
it is important to note that though it at least shows no buildings fell, it
focuses on tsunami damage.
Sendai, a massive city
which was located near the epicenter of this supposed 9.0, even two years after
the quake, reports as a result of the quake zero
collapsed structures, and zero leaning
Kobe, a similar city in
Japan, was struck by a different earthquake in 1995 which measured only 6.9
(1/100th the intensity of a 9.0) And
had over 150,000 collapsed
and leaning structures.
So
tell me, HOW does a 9.0 which reportedly lasted six minutes produce ZERO
collapsed or leaning structures, when a 6.8 which lasted 20 seconds produced
over 150,000 IN THE SAME COUNTRY, WHICH PRIDES ITSELF ON EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
CONSTRUCTION?
The scam of a 9.0 is so
transparent that even the smallest kitten scratch on the surface of the topic
lays waste to the official story; it takes a real stroke of sheeple style
blindness to overlook the fact that it was ALL TSUNAMI DAMAGE because the
earthquake never happened as stated at all. And if there was no significant
quake, WHERE ON EARTH DID THAT TSUNAMI COME FROM?
In the official USGS
quake report, which shows the five top ground accelerations measured, it
clearly shows that the peak ground acceleration happened at station MYG004,
which is 70 KM inland, yet puts the epicenter out in the ocean, where there are
no stations to record it. The station closest to the reported epicenter, which
the USGS painstakingly omits, shows that on the Japanese coast nearest the
purported “epicenter”, the quake registered a 5.63 on the richter
scale which corresponds to a total ground thrust acceleration of approximately
0.08 G’s. Look at this USGS report carefully, which puts the
ground acceleration at station MYG004 at over 12 g’s. To
put this all in perspective, a quake that produces even 1 g of ground
acceleration is considered to be one that virtually NO skyscraper, highway over
pass or bridge can survive. Why then did a 12 G monster do virtually nothing at
all where it was measured INLAND, FAR AWAY FROM THE OCEAN?
The
picture below is NOT the USGS report, CLICK THE LINK ABOVE or Here,
the USGS report is a PDF.
Take a look at the REAL
richter readings in the photo below, which were provided by the various seismic
monitoring agencies in Japan, which prove beyond all doubt the USGS lied.
Furthermore, I got
numerous shill backstabs claiming that no damage happened inland because the
ocean absorbed the quake. If the ocean really could absorb a quake (it cannot)
it would be irrelevant if the USGS charts were true, charts which show peak
ground accelerations of 12 G’s, 3.18 g’s, and 2.7 g’s, ALL TOTALLY APOCALYPTIC
READINGS, happening hundreds of miles apart ON THE JAPANESE MAINLAND. The lack
of damage outside the tsunami zone proves beyond all doubt that the USGS lied
with their charts, and is therefore complicit in the lie that gave creedence to
the Fukushima disaster.
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News
2013-03-14 05:05:04
Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/03/wheres-beef.html