Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:

By NESARA
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS Part Seven of a Series

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 16:08

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS
Part Seven of a Series
by Sherman H.
Skolnick

A real-life drama
and the players
ROBERT E. KOLODY-
For upwards of ten years a local lawyer he trusted, DANIEL V. HANLEY,
reportedly elicited from Kolody details of his legal strategy plans. Kolody
contends that The Coca-Cola Company and their marketing adjunct, Simon
Marketing, stole Kolody’s intellectual property, being storyboards and designs.
Kolody had difficulty getting a Chicago-area attorney to pursue his claims.
Since 1997, Kolody’s case has been in the U.S. District Court in Chicago, No.
97 C 190.
In February,
1999, Kolody retained Dan Ivy, an outspoken attorney from Arkansas. As required
under the local federal rules in Chicago, Ivy designated Hanley as “local
counsel”, meaning Hanley has to be informed of all proposed court filings
and procedures.
SHERMAN H.
SKOLNICK- As a long-time court reformer and TV Show moderator/producer I began
investigating the Coca-Cola case. In May, 2000, in the presence of Ivy and
Kolody, I interview Hanley
Skolnick
“Does Coca-Cola and their attorneys know the legal strategy of Robert
Kolody and his attorney Dan Ivy here?”
Daniel V. Hanley
“Yes”.
Skolnick
“Really? How could they know?”
Hanley “My
sister is MEDIA BUYER FOR COCA-COLA.” (Emphasis added.) From the signed
court Declaration by Skolnick and Skolnick’s court testimony made in the
presence of Daniel V. Hanley, 8/22/00.
After the May
interview, I find out that his sister, Mary Hanley, is Associate Media Director
at the advertising agency DDB, with offices worldwide. And get this DDB
represents both Coca-Cola and their alleged “competitor” Pepsi-Cola,
an apparent Anti-Trust violation situation.
TRIBUNE COMPANY-
As the parent firm of the Tribune media empire, the Tribune Company owns the
CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, and other newspapers around the country
as well as numerous radio and TV stations. Tribune Company is reportedly trying
to strong-arm COCA-COLA for more advertising dollars, by reportedly leaning on
DDB. But Tribune has not been interested in publicizing the Kolody suit against
Coca-Cola.
U.S. DISTRICT
JUDGE BLANCHE M. MANNING, Chicago- The Tribune, without publicity in their
newspapers, radio, and TV, has sought to intervene in one of Judge Manning’s
criminal cases to accuse her of secret proceedings and other unlawful acts and
doings. [See previous parts of this series.] The apparent purpose? To blackmail
the Judge and put pressure on Coca-Cola and DDB for more ad bucks, to relieve
the Tribune’s huge debt overhang caused by merging with the Los Angeles Times.
In a series of
court-filed Motions by Kolody, he documents how Judge Manning has been stuffing
the Court records with “judicial perjuries”, straight out lies used
to justify arbitrary and corrupt rulings favoring Coca-Cola.
GEORGE LAZARUS-
As the Chicago Tribune’s long-time, widely-read columnist on marketing and
advertising, Lazarus on 8/15/00, runs an item “Mary Hanley, a group media
director of DDB Chicago, was elected a senior VP of the agency” and
includes a picture of her.
MARY HANLEY-
Selected to be a top official of DDB Advertising, she is reportedly unavailable
to be a witness at an important hearing in Kolody’s case set for 8/22/00. Her
brother, DANIEL V. HANLEY tells Kolody and Skolnick, in a conference call, that
Mary Hanley is leaving the country for Ireland. Later, Hanley tells them she
will be back in 15 days. [Is there a link to the IRA? See previous parts of
this series.]
While Kolody is
listening on the phone, Skolnick interviews JILL ZEMANSKI, private secretary of
Mary Hanley. Jill confirms that Mary Hanley represents COCA-COLA COMPANY.
THE HEARING ON
AUGUST 22, 2000- Informed by attorney Ivy that there are in Court present two
witnesses, Skolnick and Kolody, prepared to testify that Judge Manning is
committing a fraud upon her own Court in the Coca-Cola case, Judge Manning
brings into the courtroom SIX FEDERAL POLICE to menace and intimidate Skolnick
sitting in his wheelchair.
The purpose of
the hearing? For Judge Manning to hear and consider whether she herself has
committed a fraud upon her own Court through the Judge falsifying the facts and
filling the Court records with her “judicial perjuries”. The Judge
does NOT seem to understand that such a hearing with her presiding, is outlawed
by Anglo-Saxon law, that is, for a person TO SIT AS A JUDGE IN THEIR OWN CASE.
Ivy tells the
Judge that the remedy he and his client Kolody seek is for the Judge to expunge
from the Court records all of Judge Manning’s rulings favoring The Coca-Cola
Company and Simon Marketing. Judge Manning said she will take the matter of her
own fraud upon the Court and instances brought up of newly discovered evidence,
“under advisement”. [The foregoing is shown in the Report of
Proceedings of her Court, of 8/22/00.]
Following the
hearing, the Broadsides Cable TV Program sends an envoy to Tribune columnist
GEORGE LAZARUS informing him what is happening in Court as to The Coca-Cola
Company, Mary Hanley, and DDB advertising. He expresses an interest that he is
going to follow up the matter for his column. [Or, are his bosses at the
Tribune intending to over-rule him and pursue thair reported blackmailing of
DDB, Judge Manning, Coca-Cola, and others, to shake-down more ad bucks for The
Tribune Company?]
In a Court order
dated 8/29/00, Judge Manning issues a nine-page ruling with more of her
falsified facts and “judicial perjuries”, contending she finds that
she has NOT committed a fraud upon her own Court. [An obvious ruling by someone
sitting as a Judge in their own case.] As to some of the prior rulings, Ivy
files a Notice of Appeal on August 31,2000.
Among the issues
involved in the case against Coca-Cola That the Coca-Cola Company allowed their
copyright to lapse and it is now owned by Kolody as shown by documents of the
U.S. Copyright office. That Coca-Cola has in respect to this litigation
committed a fraud by not reporting it to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission that regulates listed stock such as that of Coke.
Several weeks in
the works was a story published in the much-watched Tempo Section of the
Chicago Tribune, usually published on a Thursday. Published on Thursday,
September 7, 2000, was a lengthy Tempo story about various other soda pop
companies. In quoting a seller of a flavored foreign pop called Tarhun
“People believe Tarhun is good for you and Coke is bad for you”. Then
further quoting the seller, “For instance, have you ever seen what happens
when you put a chicken liver in a glass of Coke?” In so doing, the Tribune
was taking a swipe at Coke to reportedly shake them and DDB down for more ad
bucks.
While they were
commenting, the Tribune could have added that Coca-Cola can be a substitute for
DRANO to clear out your home plumbing.
The very next
day, Friday, September 8, 2000, player GEORGE LAZARUS was found dead on the
commuter train he took each day to the Tribune offices. In a lengthy story
Saturday, September 9, 2000, a sort of obituary, headlined “Veteran
Business Columnist George Lazarus Dies”, the Tribune stated “His
daily column, put together through an indomitable force of will for 39 years,
all but 11 of them at the Tribune, was practically Holy Writ for executives in
the marketing and advertising business in Chicago”.
Then the Tribune
adds this strange sort of cynical humor “WE WERE SURE HE WAS HIDING IN OUR
RESTROOMS”, said DDB WORLDWIDE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KEITH REINHARD.
“MANY TIMES, WE COULDN’T FIGURE OUT HOW HE GOT THE STORY.” (Emphasis
added.) Did someone plant that item in that obituary to take the glare of possible
foul play off of themselves and DDB and the Tribune and all the matters
discussed in this series?
The Tribune story
stated, “A Metra [commuter train] employee found him Friday morning,
slumped in his seat on his way to work, his customary collection of morning
newspapers still in his lap. He had died on his morning commute from his
Flossmoor home to his office downtown.”
Some of his
buddies, however, have confided to us that they are convinced that GEORGE
LAZARUS was murdered. One media homcho, poorly informed and naive, said
“Was he shot with a gun?” a foolish question in the current era of
political assassination. [Evidently, they never read the reports by CIA to
Congressional intelligence committees about cyanide pistols and potassium
killer devices.]
Did the Tribune
want their own reporter DEAD? There is the unsolved crime of about 1930,
involving a Tribune reporter, Jake Lingle, who was shaking down mobsters and
others to hush up stories. He was bumped off by being shot in a public place.
{It may be a small item but Lazarus lived among the numerous hoodlums in the
south suburb of Flossmoor.]
So you thought
that mass media reporters are only knocked off in Mexico? Ha, ha. Lazarus was
reportedly pursuing some of the issues raised by our series Was the highly
corrupt U.S. Justice Department going to finally take an interest that
Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola are owned and operated by substantially the same
people? That they are a price-fixing monopoly designed to wreck other smaller
soft drink beverage firms like R C Cola. And that DDB advertising represents
both of the two major soda pop companies, Coca-Cola and Pepso-Cola.