.
Thanks Dragon
~~~~~~~ http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2011/05/uk-landmark-case-could-stymie-legal-system-queen-not-valid-monarch.html
The link will take you to the whole story. Short version is, she was sworn in on a substitute stone. Yeah, I know. It sounds silly from here. But these are Britons. Things are different there. There’s a special stone used in the ceremony and someone, the name is revealed, switched it for a counterfeit stone. So the whole ceremony was bogus. Mind you, the coronation was in 1953.
So if the coronation was bogus, everything she’s done since then was illegal and of no effect. That’s the main idea of the case before the court.
So what’s that mean here in Peoria, I can hear you ask?
Well, aside from the fact that the United States is still a British colony, http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
it has a direct bearing on our legal system because our lawyers are members of the BAR. British Accreditation Registry. Hmmm…… I can hear you say.
It’s a very interesting story and a worthwhile read. More interesting than anything you get on daytime TV or Alex Jones. And just in case the ripple effect spills over into the American colonies, you’ll have been on top of the story from the beginning.
Dragon
