| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Incidental Whistleblower: Diane Feinstein lets NSA secret slip whilst showing off to press
21st Century Wire says…
The term hypocrite has become so synonymous with politicians these days that barely anything coming out of the mouths of Washington DC’s professional grifter class is shocking these days.
Enter stage left, Senator Diane Feinstein – a woman whose love of power and contempt for the US constitution knows no bounds, who during her recent interview with Meet the Press accidentally blurted out that our beloved NSA is tapping the internet backbone to get access to our emails. In essence, she has done exactly what she condemned Ed Snowden for doing – confirming ‘national security’ state secrets.
Now we can understand any politician’s desire to appear intelligent and informed when meeting the press – totally understandable considering the quality of characters running amok in Washington these days. But… does that mean she should be indicted for treason under the Espionage Act (a sentence she has demanded for whistleblower Snowden), or does it simply make her a hypocrite?
At 21WIRE, we think that disclosing illegal and unconstitutional federally funded activities is not treason and on that basis – we applaud Feinstein’s whistleblowing gaff. But she’s still a bloody hypocrite.
As with McCain, out-of-touch Feinstein might consider doing the American people a favour and retire from public life. Please…?
More from ye ‘ole battle axe…
.
Will Dianne Feinstein face Espionage Act charges?
So, we just discussed how it appears that Dianne Feinstein accidentally confirmed what was widely suspected: that the NSA is tapping the internet backbone to get access to emails. This is interesting on many levels, not the least of which is that Feinstein herself has been famously harsh against any kind of leak, regularly arguing that the leaks themselves are more damaging than what the leaks may reveal about US government abuse. In the past, Feinstein has raged against leakers:
In a televised interview Wednesday, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein repeatedly vented her ire over leaks of classified information and she signaled that she favors a more aggressive crackdown on those who are passing national security secrets to the press.
“What we’re seeing…is an Anschluss, an avalanche of leaks. And it’s very, very disturbing. You know, it’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy,” Feinstein (D-Calif.) said on CNN’s “Situation Room” program.
Similarly, she has argued that Ed Snowden is a “traitor” for revealing information, though unlike her, he didn’t reveal this particular program (or at least it hasn’t been reported on yet).
Meanwhile, the Senate’s current rules on revealing classified information suggest that an investigation is warranted:
The Senate Office of Security and the House counterpart are charged with investigating or coordinating investigations of suspected security violations by employees. In addition, investigations by the House and Senate Ethics Committees of suspected breaches of security are authorized by each chamber’s rules, directly and indirectly. The Senate Ethics Committee, importantly, has the broad duty to “receive complaints and investigate allegations of improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate, violations of law, violations of the Senate Code of Official Conduct, and violations of rules and regulations of the Senate.” The panel is also directed “to investigate any unauthorized disclosure of intelligence information [from the Senate Intelligence Committee] by a Member, officer or employee of the Senate.”
If, for example, Senator Wyden had ever actually revealed the details of any classified program (as some had urged him to do), you can rest assured that such an investigation (along with a public tarring and feathering) would likely have occurred. It’s also unlikely that he would be allowed to remain on the Intelligence Committee.
So, will Senator Feinstein call for an investigation into her own leak? Will she call herself a traitor? We’ll see…
-
21st Century Wire is an alternative news agency designed to enlighten, inform and educate readers about world events which are not always covered in the mainstream media.
Source: http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/10/02/incidental-whistleblower-diane-feinstein-lets-nsa-secret-slip-whilst-showing-off-to-press/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=incidental-whistleblower-diane-feinstein-lets-nsa-secret-slip-whilst-showi
Dinosaur Feinstein was I think Mayor in some town in California during the same time police and investigators were looking for Richard Ramirez, I think he was called the [night stalker]. She went in front of the camera’s and gave away a key secret about the case and hampered police efforts to catch him. She told the MSM that police were looking for a certain type shoe sole pattern that they found at crime scenes, later after Richard was caught he told the police that he watched the news and promptly threw away his shoes and got a new pair.
No matter how much this demon lady lies to the public, she just can’t keep all her secrets.