Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Bill O’Reilly has turned on Obama whom, just yesterday, he said had not lied about Obamacare (in the second video at the bottom).
1. Yesterday’s (2d video) O’Reilly video said Obama would be impeached if he lied.
2. Then, (1st video) today, O’Reilly turns on Obama and says that Obama lied.
Bill O’Reilly: Obama Believes He Can Lie To Americans About Anything Because The Ends Justify The Means For His Socialist Revolution
(Highlighted are the passages of O’Reilly saying that Obama lied.)
Bill O’Reilly has never explicitly called President Obama a liar in the health care debate, but said Thursday night that there has been “deception at the highest level” and Obama has deliberately misled the American people because he ultimately believes the ends justify the means when it comes to imposing national health care on the American public.
O’Reilly argued, “In order for the USA to become a progressive nation… the federal government must control key aspects of American life.” Therefore, Obama doesn’t concern himself with people calling him out for untruths and misleading statements because he just doesn’t care. “The president believes his vision for America, including health care for all, is more noble than any truthful statement, so he justifies his actions, even if deceit is involved.”
And liberals are perfectly fine with this approach, O’Reilly argued, because they also believe the end justifies the means and the world would be a better place “if we all listened to him.”
At 2:45, O’Reilly says openly Obama will be IMPEACHED if he’s guilty of lying about Obamacare.
I’m on a live show today at 4:55 PM Eastern. I’ll answer all questions. I’m organizing editing of Wikipedia of articles that say Obama’s the Antichrist.
My show live is here: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/discussing-antichrist-with-messiah
KoS – a few days ago, pete santilli was outed as an FBI informant when he was hacked and someone posted online a fax he sent back to his FBI handlers begging for help. here’s why that involves YOU
as a long time critic of pete’s who engaged in verbal exchanges with him in his comments threads, i noticed a definite pattern of YOU magically showing up in a pete santilli article thread any time someone started pointing out the high likelihood of pete being a fed of some sort. THEN, while i was searching through sock puppet accounts used by YOU as enumerated by wikipedia HERE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Geir_Smith
while searching for (i think it was) “edward lonesome wolf,” i found a youtube video of a woman who claimed to be a victim of electronic harassment. i thought it was very strange that the video popped up as a result, since i used quotes and the terms were nowhere to be found in the text on the page. this prompted me to ask you in a thread whether YOU were the victim of electronic harassment, and you either ignored me or insulted me – i forget which. anyway, AFTER santilli was outed as a fed informant, he had a woman on his show talking about electronic harassment, and i immediately recognized the voice as the SAME EXACT WOMAN that popped up as one of the few results when i googled your sock puppet account.
so, my question, geir:
are YOU ALSO a federal informant, or working with some other agency? are YOU paid to be here?
admit it: you act like a lunatic because it gives you a pretense – it gives you an excuse to act hilariously mad, so people chalk up what you do to lunacy, and never suspect another, more sinister and secret, motive.
isn’t that true?
i don’t think the messiah would lie to me.
OR have my comments/questions deleted.