WUA – NEWSWEEK COVER!!!! – “Peter principle” of management
Monday, November 18, 2013 9:43
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
WUA – NEWSWEEK COVER!!!! – “Peter principle” of management
It is about time that the Media sees this man for what he has always been. A total fraud that was perpetrated upon this country by a band of zealots trying to change us to what has destroyed every other culture in history. Let us hope the message catches on and is not too late.
Quoted from a friend, “When is the rest of the Obama loving media going to wake up and see this man for what he really is and how he is destroying our country?”
“NEWSWEEK COVER”!!!
An interesting read particularly when you consider the
magazine’s usual perspective. The best article written about the
dismal reign of the president. It illustrates the finest example of the “Peter principle” of management ever seen.
He is finally getting the attention he so deserves and earned…
**********************************************************************
AMAZING!!! The Cover of Liberal Newsweek Magazine!!!
Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama.
This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has
a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor
saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that
appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event,
and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President
and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built
around him by the liberal media….
______________________________________________________________
I Too Have Become Disillusioned
By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist Opinion Writer)
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of
Barack Hussein Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon,
the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the
witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man
so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into
thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct
the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most
consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life:
ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable
grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a
“community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator
devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid
of his attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally
an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate,
the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature
legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his
troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing
preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor;”
a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and
political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at
it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:
To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an
outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant
terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because
Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal
Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American
injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’ extreme, he was given a pass.
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard
– because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient
history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and
(as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him
a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby
to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the
Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense,
of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all
affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed
primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals,
feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat
themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities
to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no
responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high
drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these
minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the
emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting
from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist.
Holding someone to a separate standard merely because
of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell,
and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama
himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements,
but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was
told he was good enough for Columbia despite
undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he
was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre
record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be
president despite no record at all in the Senate.
All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was
good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence
to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism
on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who
agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless
raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool
character. Those people conservatives included -
ought now to be deeply embarrassed.
The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and
that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when
the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.
Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth –
it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed
over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his
2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for
word his 2008 speeches)
And what about his character? Obama is constantly
blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.
Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.
Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task.
It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to
advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable
with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually
came out and said no one could have done anything to
get our economy and country back on track). But really,
what were we to expect? The man has never been
responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to
act responsibly?
In short: the president is a small-minded man, with
neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle
his job. When you understand that, and only when
you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty
and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone
otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
Thanks Mark
Wake Up America – become a Member FREE right NOW!…..
American’s – Vs. – American’t……
www.WUA4u2.com – bottom right box on the home page – Join Free
WUA Campaigners & Wakers are making a difference!
Bob Burton, Florida State Director, an American
Cell – 941-587-9586
“In God We Trust”
1 NATION UNDER GOD
Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/11/wua-newsweek-cover-peter-principle-of.html
