Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By ActivistPost (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Police Dig Into the Underwear of Pulled Over Drivers and Passengers

Friday, January 31, 2014 12:37
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzIuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy00U2pPUEJpYi1fUS9VdXZkemRGVXppSS9BQUFBQUFBQURtZy9pYTN4X1RsWGc5SS9zMTYwMC9TdHJpcFNlYXJjaGVzMS5qcGc=Amanda Warren
Activist Post

Drivers and passengers in the Atlanta, Georgia area are coming forward after feeling sexually violated by police. People pulled over for minor traffic stops or registration checks are shocked to find out that the alternative to going down to the station meant officers sticking their bare fingers into underwear, touching the genitals.

For the record, not even the most broadly written, police-state favorable laws are supporting these actions. Yet, the police are confidently acting on them as though they “have permission” and have the right within the confines of law. There isn’t even “probable cause” in the report below.

Above: Jody Fleischer of Channel 2 News discusses what drivers have reported to her. Her writeup recounts quite a few disturbing incidents.


Terry Phillips was only the passenger when his wife was pulled over by Forest Park police for suspended registration.

He is clearly protesting in this dash cam video where he is conveniently taken outside the camera view “for his privacy.” The police officer who tells him he is suspected for possession of drugs later says, “Did I say…?” and continues to emphasize how much privacy he has, as though he should be grateful.

Phillips describes his experience:

He was like, ‘Just unbuckle all your clothes,’ and put his hands down inside my pants.

His attorney, Mark Bullman, says:

That’s a general strip-search, which you’re not allowed to do. Unless it’s an emergency or it’s done in a controlled environment by professional people w[h]ere other people aren’t there to look in a public setting.

If you pat the outside of someone’s pants you can clearly identify whether or not somebody has a firearm or something of that nature. You can’t be moving people’s clothing and opening them, particularly in situations where there’s not been a custodial arrest.

Notably, the people handcuffed and/or searched believed they were only saying yes to a pat down search not excessive handling, groping, hands up shorts and bare hands inside underpants and fondling parts. Presumably, they would not have permitted that kind of personal violation, which is why lawsuits are forthcoming.

The moral of the story to drivers and passengers in Georgia is, as the news reporter concludes – DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR A SEARCH. Never say “yes,” never imply it’s okay. A question nags: what happens to people who say “no,” thereby revoking “verbal consent”?

Unfortunately, little is said about what happens if you are taken to the station for a private search when you deny permission for a roadside body search. The news video seems to imply that you would be searched in the station, and can only avoid the added embarrassment of roadside publicity. But would you be taken to the station at all if you said, “NO”?

And why are people in minor stops having to get out of the vehicle at all or placed in handcuffs?

Article and Image Source:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/roadside-violation-drivers-passengers-say-police-s/nc7kd/

Recent other articles by Amanda Warren



Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/police-dig-into-underwear-of-pulled.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • ah the cop uses the old stand by “i smell marijuana” which is inconclusive because although he may or may not be able to detect the odor of marijuana, smoked or otherwise.. he cannot PROVE HE SMELLED A DAMN THING!
    and in my own personal experience, I had never smoked marijuana but the cop LIED and insisted he smelled marijuana! BLATANT LIE! just to justify a search which produced NOTHING because there was NEVER ANYTHING TO FIND! ILLEGAL SEARCH based on the LIES of a CRIMINAL WITH A BADGE!!!!

  • Maybe they ran their plates and the owner of the car was a known child molesting drug dealer or known to hang out with CIA people or something. Soon they will all lick you with their tongue at roadside stops and describe in reports what you tasted like.
    Moo.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.