| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
“We the People”, but, Who are We?
Saturday, January 25, 2014 17:06
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Via Gary
“………..any who have designs contrary to the support and continuation of the United States, as intended by the Framers, and described herein, are inconsistent with the purpose of the country, and, as such, are against the Constitution and should be deemed unacceptable and unwanted visitors.”
***********************************
In some research for another article (The Fourteenth Article in Amendment to the Constitution), I ran across a rather enlightening revelation. It was, just 60 years after the Constitution, a clear and concise definition of just (and only) who the “We the People”, in the Preamble to the Constitution, really are.
Now, most of us will assume that any citizen of the United States is one of, “We the People”. I must admit that until recently, I, too, believed this to be the case.
Regardless of the (political) correctness of this assumption, we must understand that the law is what it was intended to be, not what we might want it to be. There is only one means by which that can be changed, and that is the amendment process defined in Article V, of the Constitution.
So, here is what was revealed to us, by the Supreme Court of the United States, with regard to a definitive answer to the question. The case is Dred Scott v. Sandford - 60 U.S. 393 (1856)
More @ Outpost of Freedom
Source: http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2014/01/we-people-but-who-are-we.html
