Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Golden Age Of Gaia
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Alternate Ukraine Perspective: CIA And EU Collude To Execute Another Color Revolution

Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:14
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The Ukrainian opposition has resorted to violence rarely seen in Kiev.

The Ukrainian opposition has resorted to violence rarely seen in Kiev.

Stephen: While a new truce appears to be in place -  and Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych has apparently agreed to a new constitution, diminished powers  and early elections  – this story from four days ago shows that, according to the writer, the current situation in Ukraine is a classic example of the age-old “Problem ~ Reaction ~ Solution” concept of international meddling/control at work. Thanks to Joe. For more about what is a “Color Revolution”, see second article I’ve posted below.

By Michael Thomas – February 19th, 2014

http://tinyurl.com/m4rped3

Even after the world community of nations watched US envoy Victoria Nuland show up in the Ukraine with the explicit purpose of fomenting a coup d’etat, the Ukrainian president seems powerless to stop its momentum.

Such is the profound and pervasive power that the CIA, NSA, DIA and US State Department exert around the globe. Even with the countless alternative news websites on the internet exposing US-UK -EU crimes against other nations, do they proceed with starting civil wars without impediment.

How can this be so in an age when the people have steadily taken back their power from the aforementioned alphabet soup agencies that seemingly run their covert, black budgeted operations anytime they choose to?

ANSWER: These US agencies and their European counterparts, when colluding to trigger a revolution for the purposes of regime change, have so finely tuned the implementation of the HEGELIAN DIALECTIC that they are still virtually unstoppable. This continuing predicament is possible only because the people, who are victims of the relentless mind control programming which accompanies these color revolutions, are vulnerable. They have been made vulnerable by a panoply of techniques and measures which the secret services have employed since time immemorial. Only now their strategies are more sophisticated, more stealthy, more imperceptible by the average citizen.

How is it that a large national constituency can be so influenced that they will vote or revolt, sacrifice or rebel in a manner that is clearly against their best interest?

The answer is quite simple, as the Ukraine conflagration vividly illustrates. The CIA et al. has for years surreptitiously built their network and cultivated their contacts throughout the western half of the Ukraine. Knowing that the eastern half would always lean toward Russia because of proximity and cultural ties, they knew they only had to control the eastern side of the equation. And so they did. And so they have up to this very day.

This state of affairs eventually permitted the CIA tet al. to utilize their “Divide and Conquer” strategy with awesome effect. Once the two sides are fighting with each other, as they are now, it just a matter of execution.

Isn’t this exactly what we are witnessing in Kiev. And, in the other major cites throughout the Ukraine where they CIA et al. are effectively exporting the same strategy and violent tactics. This divide and conquer MO is absolutely essential to the whole color revolution dynamic because it allows them to invoke “plausible deniability” whenever the Russians rightfully accuse the CIA et al. of implementing a classic CIA-coordinated coup d’etat.

As long as enough Ukrainians step up to the plate to sacrifice life and limb for the US-UK-EU cause, there’s no blame to rub off on John Kerry, or Victoria Nuland, or Barack Obama. In reality, all three of these characters are directly responsible for yet another crime against a nation in which innocent civilians are used as pawns and sometimes killed. When will the American people wake up to this fact of life? How many more large and small genocides must the community of nations watch before they collectively respond to terminate this criminal behavior by governments? Is this really just state-sponsored terrorism?!

Poland’s Solidarity Leader Jumps On Board The Putin-Bashing Train

As Lech Walesa recently opined that it’s all about the money, one can only speculate that the EU and COMPANY desperately needs Ukrainian “money” because of their ongoing, slow motion nation-by nation bankruptcy. Here is Walesa’s quote exactly:

“But the truth is, if Ukraine were part of the European Union, it would give Russia an opportunity to make 10 times more money because Ukraine’s economy and trade would become more stable and prosperous.”

What Walesa is really trying to say is that the EU stands to make that much money by controlling the Ukraine markets, natural resources, export/import channels, transportation network, oil and gas conduits, and political apparatus once they join the European Union. These are, after all, the immediate and stated goals of the EU representatives who have weighed in on the matter. And they are determined not to let Russia interfere with their plans, no matter what the level of chaos or death toll required to attain it.

The Ukrainian opposition has resorted to violence rarely seen in Kiev.

Herein lies the root cause of the current mayhem being sewn throughout the Ukrainian People’s Republic.

The catalyst for the extraordinarily violent confrontation between the opposition and the current administration is the viability of the European Union itself. The EU has been so decimated by years of deep recession and national bankruptcies throughout the PIIGS nations that they desperately need a fresh market to exploit. The Ukraine provides just that, and much more.

“The EU has become such an economic drain on the rest of the world, especially the US Federal Reserve, that its current and future indebtedness and unfunded liabilities are simply untenable. Hence, the Ukraine is looked to as a temporary savior because of its many large and robust markets, well established industrial base and transportation links to Asia, as well as it vast natural resources and raw materials.”

Unfortunately, this excerpt spells out the formidable macroeconomic forces at work in this unfolding national cataclysm. The EU is like a pit bull that has tasted a little blood and will simply not let go. Their outright and aggressive interference in Kiev is so bold that it graphically betrays their true intentions. Quite frankly, rarely has anyone ever seen US gunboat diplomacy so naked and bold. Working in concert with the EU, the US (especially the FED) knows that its fortunes (and solvency) depend greatly on the future prospects of the Eurozone. Many now wonder whether Russia can contain such a rabid dog, especially when so much is at stake for their largest neighbor and ex-Soviet trading partner.

“Problem ~ Reaction ~ Solution”

The most effective tool in the CIA et al. toolbox is this: “Problem ~ Reaction ~ Solution”. This dynamic of mass manipulation has become so effective at engineering color revolutions across the globe that it’s surprising more nations are not falling prey to it. In the case of the Ukraine, it all started with the failure of their President to sign a critical trade agreement with the EU. That was the “Problem”. The people in the western part of the country were then riled up, whereupon they basically tok over the capital. This preplanned and unusually violent takeover was run out of the Western capitals, as such an obviously manufactured, mass revolt would never have happened spontaneously.

The “Reaction” of course was the President’s response to the aggressors. His Administration had every right to protect their capital city and all state buildings. The ferocity of the opposition protest was such that the government was forced to use force. What would Obama do if such an uprising occurred in Washington, DC? Yes, there’s be much more blood in the streets. Yet the West now threatens the Ukraine with sanctions even though the government is doing only what it is tasked to do.

Now comes the “Solution”. The EU and Company are using every bit of leverage they can muster to get what it is that they really want. They will accept nothing less than a Ukraine marketplace that is totally available for exploitation, without any Russian constraints on their financial intentions or economic plans. This solution is taking shape by the day, as one EU nation after another steps forward with their veiled demands and/or transparent expectations.

Conclusion:

This is how it works when predatory capitalism starts enters its final stages of evolution (read devolution). The lack of the real recovery throughout the global economy has created very similar tensions which are now breaking out everywhere — Venezuela and US, India and US, Japan(and US) and China, Thailand, Turkey, Argentina, Brazil, etc. Even the entire Arab Spring phenomenon was a glowing and hard-to-watch example of this geo-political and economic dynamic.

The true state of the European Union is such that it is in tatters both economically and financially; thus, they feel they have no choice but to self preserve at any costs. As for the hapless folks in the Ukraine, they know so very little about what is driving the US-EU juggernaut over their nation. The MSM (Mainstream Media) has done very little to reveal what has been described in this exposé. As usual, the MSM has portrayed this national plight as they do in every instance, and in so doing they serve as a necessary accomplice to a full-blown color revolution — Yankee-style.

Without the MSM carrying water for the Obama Adminsitration, these color revolutions would never be so successful. There are numerous examples of headlines below which demonstrate the MSM and US Federal Government contributions to this national catastrophe unfolding in the Ukraine. You really have to wonder if there is any conscience whatsoever as the many media and political operatives execute yet another CIA-concieved coup d’etat.

At the end of the day, it will be the American people who will bear the brunt of so much animosity being generated by these color revolutions. They are occurring more frequently around the world, and producing death tolls and serious injuries that are completely unacceptable. Perhaps it is time to hold to account the US politicians, diplomats, CIA agents, media reps, etc. who participate in these highly orchestrated events. Otherwise, the responsibility may fall at the feet of those who are the most blameless.

ColorRevolution by A Signl.

ColorRevolution by A Signl.

Perfecting The Method of “Color Revolutions”

By Thierry Meyssan,  Global Research – August 07, 2012

http://www.globalresearch.ca/perfecting-the-method-of-color-revolutions

In 1985, a social scientist, Gene Sharp, published a study commissioned by NATO on Making Europe Unconquerable. He pointed out that ultimately a government only exists because people agree to obey it. The USSR could never control Western Europe if people refused to obey Communist governments.

A few years later, in 1989, Sharp was tasked by the CIA with conducting the practical application of his theoretical research in China. The United States wanted to topple Deng Xiaoping in favor of Zhao Ziyang. The intention was to stage a coup with a veneer of legitimacy by organizing street protests, in much the same way as the CIA had given a popular facade to the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh by hiring Tehran demonstrators (Operation Ajax, 1953).

The difference here is that Gene Sharp had to rely on a mix of pro-Zhao and pro-US youth to make the coup look like a revolution. But Deng had Sharp arrested in Tiananmen Square and expelled from the country. The coup failed, but not before the CIA spurred the youth groups into a vain attack to discredit Deng through the crackdown that followed. The failure of the operation was attributed to the difficulties of mobilizing young activists in the desired direction.

Ever since the work of French sociologist Gustave Le Bon in the late nineteenth century, we know that adults behave like children when they are in the throes of collective emotion. They become susceptible, even if for just a critical fleeting moment, to the suggestions of a leader-of-men who for them embodies a father figure. In 1990, Sharp got close to Colonel Reuven Gal, then chief psychologist of the Israeli Army (he later became deputy national security adviser to Ariel Sharon and now runs operations designed to manipulate young Israeli non-Jews). Combining the discoveries of Le Bon and Sigmund Freud, Gal reached the conclusion that it was also possible to exploit the “Oedipus complex” in adolescents and steer a crowd of young people to oppose a head of state, as a symbolic father figure.

On this basis, Sharp and Gal set up training programs for young activists with the objective of organizing coups. After a few successes in Russia and the Baltics, it was in 1998 that Gene Sharp perfected the method of “color revolutions” with the overthrow of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic.

After President Hugo Chavez foiled a coup in Venezuela on the basis of one of my investigations revealing the role and method of Gene Sharp, the latter suspended the activities of the Albert Einstein Institute which served as a cover and went on to create new structures (CANVAS in Belgrade, the Academy of Change in London, Vienna and Doha). We saw them at work the world over, especially in Lebanon (Cedar Revolution), Iran (Green Revolution), Tunisia (Jasmine Revolution) and Egypt (Lotus Revolution). The principle is simple: exacerbate all underlying frustrations, blame the political apparatus for all the problems, manipulate the youth according to the Freudian “patricidal” scenario, organize a coup, and then propagandize that the government was brought down by the “street.”

International public opinion easily swallowed these stage settings: first, because of a confusion between a crowd and the people. Thus, the “Lotus Revolution” actually boiled down to a show on Tahrir Square in Cairo, mobilizing a crowd of tens of thousands, while the near totality of the Egyptian people abstained from taking part in the event; and second, because there is a lack of clarity with regard to the word “revolution”. A genuine revolution entails an upheaval in social structures that takes place over several years, while a “color revolution” is a regime change that occurs within weeks. The other term for a forced change of leadership without social transformation is a “coup d’état”. In Egypt, for example, it is clearly not the people who pushed Hosni Mubarak to resign, but U.S. Ambassador Frank Wisner who gave him the order.

The slogan of the “color revolutions” harks back to an infantile perspective; What matters is to overthrow the head of state without consideration of the consequences–“Don’t worry about your future, Washington will take care of everything for you.” By the time people wake up, it’s too late; the government has been usurped by individuals not of their choosing. At the outset though, there are cries of “Down with Shevardnadze!” Or “Ben Ali, get out!” The latest version was launched at the third conference of “Friends” of Syria (Paris, July 6): “Bashar must go!”

A strange anomaly can be detected with regard to Syria. The CIA did not locate groups of young Syrians willing to chant this slogan in the streets of Damascus and Aleppo. So it is Barack Obama, François Hollande, David Cameron and Angela Merkel themselves who repeat the slogan in chorus from their respective foreign offices. Washington and its allies are trying out the methods of Gene Sharp on the “international community”. It is a risky bet to imagine that foreign ministries can be as easy to manipulate as youth groups! At the moment, the result is simply ridiculous: the leaders of the colonial powers have been stomping their feet like angry, frustrated children over a desired object that the Russian and Chinese adults won’t let them have while ceaselessly wailing “Bashar must go!“.

Thierry Meyssan, founder and chairman of Voltaire Network and the Axis for Peace Conference. Professor of International Relations at the Centre for Strategic Studies in Damascus. His columns specializing in international relations feature in daily newspapers and weekly magazines in Arabic, Spanish and Russian. His last two books published in English : 9/11 the Big Lie and Pentagate.


]]>

< ![CDATA[

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.