Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By The Sleuth ​Journal
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Climate Change Science Versus The IPCC Climate Models (VIDEO)

Saturday, February 8, 2014 3:26
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

science misinformation

science misinformation

See below the Skeptics’ Case Guide to illustrate the fraud of climate change and/or global warming, as explained by the establishment media and political whores. No politics, just facts.

In just 12 minutes an analysis of the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data demonstrates that the climate models got all their major predictions wrong.

Why? Because of the only aspect of the debate that the main stream media and the political whores do not mention when discussing climate: The Feedbacks.

“Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention…”, remembers Dr. David M.W. Evans, a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering.

According to Dr. Evans, “the evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1998 to 2006″, causing him to go from being a warmist to a skeptic.

Please pause as needed.

As you have now learned, both scientists and skeptics agree about the direct effects of CO2 emissions. What they do not agree on are the effects of The Feedbacks, which as the data shows do not do what the IPCC climate models say. This means that the supposed effects of CO2 emissions, if the best and latest data is taken into account, must be cut by two thirds in order to reflect reality.

If you found this analysis of climate model predictions versus real data helpful, please make sure to pass it around to people who still do not understand it.

Special thanks to Stephan Molyneux from Freedomain Radio and Dr. David M.W. Evans.

Read Dr. Evans’ report “The Skeptic’s Case” on the Ludwig von Mises Institute website.

The article Climate Change Science Versus The IPCC Climate Models (VIDEO) published by TheSleuthJournal – Real News Without Synthetics



Source: http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/climate-change-science-versus-ipcc-climate-models-video/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • true, CO2 emissions are not causing global warming. but that doesn’t mean global warming is not occurring due to human efforts. Currently, the weak Solar Maximum has not heated the Earth as expected, and so we are seeing LESS global warming effects than anticipated. But part of the problem is that as the EQUATOR/TROPICS heats up and the atmosphere expands, the cold air at the POLES which is denser also tends to expand and comes down from the poles…giving colder temperature readings over vast areas of the developed Northern Hemisphere. The result is that people say: “where’s the global warming, we’re freezing!” But the cold air coming from the North Pole is due to global warming at the equator…which, although it was LESSENED by weak Solar Max is therefore being caused by some other source than CO2 or Solar Maximum. ie. human activity.
    There still is global warming, but it’s sneaky.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.