(N.Morgan) Along with the other rights we are losing daily, the 2nd Amendment is falling to fascist tyranny fast. Tyranny is taking a hold of this country and its citizens with such force, it seems that every day, something even worse happens than the day prior, when it comes to the Supreme Court. The 2nd Amendment has saved this country from conflict from other countries, keeping them at bay, knowing we Americans were armed to the gills. This regime and its court system, want to take it away.
Will this lead into a violent revolution? Is this what this regime is pushing us towards? And if so, which side will you choose? Tyranny or freedom?
Gary Marbut, president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, said the lawsuit he and his organization brought to uphold the state’s rights on weapons will not be considered at the Supreme Court. The court’s unwillingness to take the case leaves standing a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld a lower court’s decision to throw out the Montana Firearms Freedom Act. The law states that firearms made and kept in Montana are exempt from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause, which gives the federal government authority to regulate commerce only “among” the states. In a posting to supporters, Marbut wrote that the case is now at the end of the road, but a movement has been spawned. The Montana Firearms Freedom Act, he said, “caught a sympathetic wave as the first legislation of its type in the U.S.”
“It was cloned and enacted in eight other states, and cloned and introduced in the legislatures of about 23 other states yet.” Marbut said it’s clear that “a majority of the states of the U.S. are operating under the same frustration with the run amok federal government as is Montana.” “Further, the MFFA inspired a whole wave of other ‘freedom acts,’ such as the light bulb freedom act, the whiskey freedom act, the tobacco freedom act, the healthcare freedom act, and others. Inspired by the MFFA, the U.S. is now alive with ‘nullification’ efforts at the state level – state efforts telling the federal government to back off,” he said. All of that activity, Marbut said, means there is a need for the Supreme Court to step into this general controversy “if it has any hope to maintain respect for its historic-but-abandoned turf as any sort of check on the other federal branches.”
“This epic trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the court’s rejection of MSSA v. Holder have finally persuaded me that it is fruitless to expect any part of the federal government to control the lust for centralized and tyrannical power that our federal government displays,” he said. Marbut said further that, perhaps more importantly, his case “proves that it is improper to rely on the federal government, or any branch thereof, to be the judge of what powers the states have delegated to the federal government in the Constitution.”