| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Lying For The Image
Via Terry
Not that it's a new thing but it just gets under my skin. See, I was brought up not to lie, and so the concept that one would lie for some “greater good” just doesn't fit in my brain. If the truth isn't persuasive enough, it's not on your side. With the possible exception being something like telling the guy holding the gun on you that you swear you won't call the cops after he leaves. The image that ticked me off? This one from the Supreme Court this week:
If you know anything about this case, you know it has essentially nothing do with either of these signs or what's being presented in any news source, be it CNN or Fox. It's about whether a company has to provide abortifacients in compliance with Federal law, not contraceptives; the deeper question is do people who form a company give up their human right to live in compliance with their faith or even their preferences. Hobby Lobby already provides contraceptives (16 out of 20 required), their issue is with the 20% which function by preventing survival of an embryo – an abortifacient. Neither one of those signs represents that case at all. The one on the left is a dangerous assault on all religions everywhere. The one on the right, while technically a true statement, is 100% irrelevant. It's not a healthcare plan. It's also not a refrigerator, it's not a banana, and perhaps most relevant: it's not a government office.
Source: http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2014/03/lying-for-image.html
