By Creativity, Passion & Kinship
Contributor profile | More stories

yes, it's been 'that long' – the 30th Anniversary of my first Hertzan Chimera Unit dream is on its way. It's due, but I don't have a real idea when the dream was. I didn't keep the date. However, I did 'bother' the sci.physics.alt-new-theories with my HC Unit Theory back in 1985. So, it would have been a short time before then that the dream took place.

Maybe 2015 would be the year of the 30th…

But it doesn't matter.

You can see it there, in the illustration/schematic from 1985, sitting alone in dotted no-space. It doesn't exist, in our region of existence. It's a physical/electromagnetic non-entity, only showing itself when it produces clockwise or anti-clockwise excess (the red and the green phases above) or spin. Mostly it just 'is' tumbling through perpendiculars to our existence. Showing its faces to the universe… + 0 – 0… sinusoidally cycling like that.

And recently, my ideas of this 'single atom generating clockwise and anti-clockwise excess' Universal Equilibrium Engine have changed, slightly. I've relied upon the Nobel gases of the periodic table to find stable i.e. non-excessing, arrangements of HC Units in serial cycle, ninety degrees out of phase – HC4 (was helium), HC20 (was neon) etc. HC4 being 'helium' made loads of sense, four HC (hadron) Units ninety degrees out of phase with each other, as this system would FEED ITSELF with no net charge output.

But what if the HC Unit is a quark an not a hadron.

But it doesn't matter.

I thought I'd 'broken' my idea by considering the HC Unit as anything other than a hadron or, to me, a neutron able to generate both a protonic and electronic variety of itself. I went back to the numbers. And such is the nature of these 'virtual Nobel's within the higher atom structures, it doesn't matter.

Why?

Well, if four-quark is a no net charge device, I can simply refer to Dark Matter aka the recently discovered tetraquarks made by crushing hadrons together at CERN and other colliders. Here's why it doesn't matter.

That was 'helium' using the hadron scheme, but in the quark scheme it would just be tetraquark or Dark Matter made of two mesons, as shown. Even back then I had (hadronic) Hydrogen gathered in groups of two, so there's no betrayal of the concept there. It doesn't (really) matter because (even back then) I had the (hadronic) HC Units linking and forming larger atoms in threes. You can see this all in the above sketch, and here's how it translates up from hadronic to quarkic. 

0+0 is a + (clockwise excess)

+0- is a 0 (EU flowing through)

0-0 is a – (anti-clockwise excess)

-0+ is a 0 (EU flowing through)

You just add a three-quark to each of the +0-0 nodes of the above illo i.e. the structure remains the same whether it's a hadronic HC Unit or a quarkic HC Unit. There are still 'virtual Nobel's (the grey squares above) buried within the higher elements to retain structure.

YOU WANT MORE? BUY THE HERTZAN CHIMERA UNIT from Amazon, etc.

Comments

Your Comments