Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Here is the full article. Very informative.
—————————————————————————–
“White Hats” Go Public on Car Hacking by Remote Control!
On July 14, 2013, we leaked exclusive insider info revealing that all cars made since 2008 can be remote-controlled. Nearly a year later, a group calling themselves “White Hats” has proven this can be done — in a twelve-minute video with Motherboard that just “went viral” on Digg.com.
It is very important that we inform ourselves and spread the truth as it becomes available. By participating in this mass disclosure ourselves, we are helping to ensure a positive outcome.
CARS CAN BE REMOTE-CONTROLLED FOR A “CLEAN” ASSASSINATION
Last July, in “Financial Tyranny Collapsing at Free-Fall Speed,” we took the momentum of the Snowden NSA disclosures to reveal a much-deeper secret.
We leaked this intel from personal discussions with insiders who have high-level security clearance — from levels well above the President of the United States.
As astonishing as it may seem, we revealed that all car manufacturers have been forced to install remote-control driving systems in their products since 2008.
Thanks to a still-classified government order, no automobile manufacturer is allowed to produce cars without having these automated systems in place.
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY
On the positive side, intelligence services can utilize these systems to prevent any would-be bank robber from successfully completing their crime.
On the negative side, the fiery death of Michael Hastings, a journalist exposing corruption at the highest levels, almost certainly revealed that this technology is also being used for assassinations.
What most people still do not realize is that there is an incredibly vast world of secrets that NSA surveillance and car hacking is being used to conceal.
At the time of this writing, “Financial Tyranny Collapsing” has had 4,576 Facebook Likes, 381 comments and 170,442 unique views — so this was not a “fringe” investigation.
Here is a quick bit of review of what we revealed almost a year ago now — and I do recommend reading the whole article for context:
HOW WOULD THEY DEAL WITH IT?
Let’s imagine that a “crazy” idea like “All vehicles sold in the US since 2008 are legally required to be remote-controllable” were to be disclosed, publicly, by a whistleblower.
(I have no idea if that will ever actually happen. It’s only a hypothetical question at this point — but some insiders have suggested this may be the case, as we will see.)
What would the official response be? Would they say this remote-control piloting system was only being used to stop criminals, dope dealers and terrorists?
Could these systems also be used for targeted assassinations — making cars accelerate really fast, without the operator’s control, and then steering them into a tree while locking the driver inside?
Could power groups then use this to “take out” people who threaten them — like journalists chasing a major new story?
How many drivers would think fast enough to realize what was happening, have a good tool on hand to smash out a window, and jump out before the impact?
Would we entrust our “leaders” to be able to completely take control of our vehicles, and remotely pilot them, without our consent — if this were publicly known?
How far would the “I have nothing to hide” argument get you at that point?
Filed under: apocalypse, energies, new energies, partners in contrast Tagged: David Wilcock