Tweets by realDonaldTrump

Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Wake Up World
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The “Mysteries of Life and Death” Chronicled in Ancient Archaeology

Thursday, June 5, 2014 18:23

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By Steven & Evan Strong

Contributing Writers for Wake Up World

An academic paper by Frederic Slater and R.H. Goddard was to be “read before the Australasian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science” in Auckland NZ in 1937. The paper, co-written by archaeologist Slater and anthropologist Goddard, delved into the mythology, science and archaeology Slater referred to (albeit briefly) in a Sydney Morning Herald article.

Today, with every official record of Slater’s work missing or censored from history, we can never be sure whether the paper was ever actually presented. What we do know was that this paper was officially stamped as “cancelled” by Sydney University, with a date of “December 8, 1939”.

The “Mysteries of Life and Death” Chronicled in Ancient Archaeology

Coincidentally, within two months of this ink drying on this “cancelled” treatise, another important site Slater was working on - the ancient Standing Stones depicting the sacred First Language - was destroyed after governmental pressure was (reportedly) applied to the land holder.

We believe this paper is the sole remaining survivor of the official attempts to expunge Slater’s work and existence from all public records. Despite his long and public academic career, there doesn’t appear to be a single other paper or photograph left behind — only a handful of obscure news articleswe recently uncovered in regional archives. And we suspect it was opposition to Slater’s suggestion of off-world interactions that prevent his paper from being heard or discussed in public circles and lead to his disappearance from history. It would certainly be a logical conclusion, especially given the nature of his work and the academic climate in which he worked.

In that context, we believe this paper may have escaped the attention of the censor simply because H.R. Goddard’s name was listed first, being a joint presentation. But in reality Goddard’s contribution was largely descriptive, not interpretive. He provided locations, site details and diagrams; Slater then provided detailed explanations of the engravings based on his considerable knowledge of Original culture and the Original First Language.

We have previously discussed Slater’s interpretations, which repeatedly describe the Original Sky Heroes as well as humanity’s off-world ancestry. Beginning with Baiame, the central and first ‘Creation Being’, Slater identifies a recurring motif – Baiame “brought living things from on high and then stepped back into the high regions from whence he came”. As noted by Slater, Baiame means “he who brought life from on high”; his first priority was to bring “life into the world, set down man and woman and gave them the sacred means of propagating life”.

But what needs to be appreciated here is that this paper represented only a part of what Slater discovered.

The Principle of Life

The joint paper opens with Goddard’s contribution, “Certain Observations of Aboriginal Rock Carvings in the Wollombi District”. Goddard’s role was to set the scene, to describe what was there. His paper is thorough in compilation, measurements, direction and descriptions, but very light on in titles or accompanying deeds. Although his role was not to interpret, his concluding remark reflects an appreciation and sense of reverence for the hallowed and sacred place on which he stood: “Wollombi to the aboriginal(sic) was as Glastonbury to Medieval England.”

Slater’s task was far more complicated, grounded in the site’s immense spiritual and cultural significance.

We have often made mention of the uncharacteristic absence of a neck on the Sky Hero engravings in this region, and discussed the potential implications. But Slater was also taken by another bodily absence; all the engravings on these rock platforms have no mouth. Viewed in context, Slater concluded that the figures with “a head and a nose but no mouth represent the principle of life”.

Slater also made note of the most common marking found on all the platforms: the Emu pad. Such foot prints “were supposed, by the uninitiated, to be [seens as] those of a monster” who was so powerful that it “sucked down in a whirlpool anyone who bathed in one of its waterholes”. However, to those familiar with the deeper mysteries of Original Lore and the First language (as Slater undoubtedly was) “they have nothing to do with the imaginary and destructive bird”. The word emu (Guiye-ngaia) is somewhat deceptive, as “guiye” means “a fish”. Slater believes this “has probably given rise to the idea that this emu was some sort of creature that lived in the water”. Of course, the misconception of the emu as a “monster” runs counter to the role emus play in Original Lore; when placed beside each other, two emus form a gateway or path to the stars and Universe above.

CONTINUE READING

Previous articles by Steven & Evan Strong: