Australian judge is open to pedophilia and incest

What is pedophilia? Sex with a child before pubescence which means before pubic hairs are present, not a 16 and 17 year old person which is why in the US some states allow age 16 young women to have sex and not have it a crime. That being said, there are many countries that follow the traditional law of nature where a young woman age 13 can marry and have children. People may not like it but it has been human custom through out the ages to bare children early up unto the industrial revolution. In many countries it is still practiced and excepted.

Incest has been a long taboo based on religious teachings and the thought that families could have handicapped children, which some do over time. Most families however give birth to normal children. So here is something to ponder, If two handicapped people want to marry they can. It is almost guaranteed they will have a handicapped child yet they still can marry. The concept of incest then really doesn’t have merit based on having mutated children since most incest created children are not handicapped.

Then there is the New Homosexual marriage issue. I don’t like using the word GAY because it really means happy but was changed by the LBGT community. Anyway, the idea of people coming together in their homes to have perverted sex doesn’t effect others outside the home so the other two listed deviant behaviors would also apply in the same content. I’m not saying any of this is the correct thing to do but i also understand the opposites sides opinion.

In summary, the judge is correct in his statement even though I and others prefer the best way to have relationships and that is traditional marriage between a man and a woman of a mature age.