| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Contradictory Rulings Proffer More Obamacare Headaches
Circuit courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia issued opposite rulings Tuesday, just hours and not so many miles apart from one another.
The basic question is whether the federal government can subsidize health insurance offered through the federal exchange. The D.C. court ruled that the government can only offer subsidies sold through state-based exchanges, while the Virginia court ruled that HealthCare.gov plans can also be subsidized.
The vast majority of states (36) declined to set up their own online marketplaces, and many people can only buy coverage through the federal exchange. Since the Affordable Care Act mandates that everyone buy insurance and the government will financially support those who cannot afford to do so, the D.C. ruling could be a real problem.
Or not.
As Reuters reports: “The appearance of a split between separate circuit courts over the question of Obamacare subsidies could increase the chance of Supreme Court intervention. But legal experts and some Republicans on Capitol Hill said the full D.C. Circuit court, dominated by appointees of Democratic presidents, was likely to overturn its panel’s ruling or at least revisit it.”
So, perhaps another showdown in the Supreme Court, perhaps not. We’ll keep you posted.
—Posted by Peter Z. Scheer
Related Entries
- July 20, 2014 The Actor and the Minister
- July 16, 2014 We Need Elizabeth Warren on the Supreme Court
Source: http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/contradictory_rulings_proffer_more_obamacare_headaches_20140722/
