| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
From Jim Stone
Flush Gordon Duff, this is NOT a jokeRoland wrote:
My responseGordon Duff is self-stated disinfo, and even on reports he stands behind as “peer reviewed” and 100 percent truth, he lacks the knowledge he needs to filter out that which is false, and is completely unqualified for any type of technical analysis of many topics he speaks about. Gordon also admits to publishing 40 percent disinfo, so when this is combined with a complete inability to get facts straight, it is devastating for the truth.
If you like Gordon Duff and feel offended by what I just said here, at least try to keep an open mind and take a look at what I do to one of his reports, this is NOT JUST A LITTLE DEBUNK, IT DESTROYS DUFF ENTIRELY with SUPER SIMPLE TO FIND PROOF HE IS FULL OF IT. VERY BAD.Gordon Duff, of Veteran’s Today posts ridiculously impossible and technically flawed report about “micro nukes”My corrections are in bold. It may be hard to take if you like Gordon, but see this out, it is VERY BAD and SPOT ON. Gordon Duff’s micro nuke report is SO BAD that there is not a single statement in it that is even partially true, which is impossible unless it was intentional and Gordon’s real goal was to generate raucious laughter in an intelligence chamber somewhere while making the alternative media look completely ROCK STUPID in front of people who actually know what he is talking about.Why am I posting this? Because irresponsible journalism will sabotage 911 truth. If you want to know why 911 reality has not taken off and crashed a majority of Americans in the head, take a look at this report by Gordon Duff. Such ridiculous drivel will instantly be rejected by ANYONE with ANY knowledge at all with regard to the subject at hand, and will lump the 9-11 truthers who are rooted in real science with the wackos. It’s a brilliantly written report SIR DUFF, and because it is a little bit technical and so well worded it will bamboozle many people and spread like wildfire, only to be laughed at and ridiculed by intelligentsia, the segment of society that really can make a difference.
First, an excerpt from the report,“According to government nuclear weapons designers, this is the size of a typical thermonuclear weapon available after 1991, shown in representative size only as a popular consumer soft drink:
This, according to government scientists is the current size of a thermonuclear device, a hydrogen bomb, containing a small amount of uranium or plutonium, no larger than a coin, a supply of deuterium, tritium and a highly classified “nano-laser,” probably chemically fired to replace the otherwise required fission reaction.1.These are the nuclear materials he claims are used:
“a small amount of uranium or plutonium, no larger than a coin, a supply of deuterium, tritium”
He states the weapons design uses URANIUM or PLUTONIUM, yet claims the materials have a 48 hour half life. Yet reality puts the half life of even the most radiologically active form of uranium at tens of thousands of years which is a LOT longer than the 48 hours he claims. Tritium has a half life of 7 years, thus making his “half-life of under 48 hours” a technical impossibility.
It is EXTREMELY important to note that he claimed this report was peer reviewed, which is an OUTRIGHT LIE unless the “peers” were a bunch of drunks from Joe’s bar who fix rear axles and never got to algebra, let alone physics. It is a critical failure that CANNOT BE FORGIVEN, IT IS JUST TOO BASIC AND TO CLAIM PEER REVIEW IS FRAUD.
2.When he states : “Radiation is only 3% of that of a normal weapon, undetectable by Geiger counter, unable to penetrate skin, but fatal if irradiated materials are ingested” he is giving a description of Beta and Alpha radiation which are unsuitable for any type of weapons type nuclear reaction. Because beta and alpha are the only types of radiation that could be blocked and rendered “undetectable by a geiger counter” by the shielding around any device small enough to fit in a coke can. This is a well known beginner physics topic called the Cookie question” nukes use GAMMA RADIATION TO FUNCTION AND THEREFORE NEED TO HAVE GAMMA EMITTING MATERIALS, WHICH IS ALWAYS DETECTABLE BY EVEN THE CHEAPEST EBAY GEIGER COUNTER and something as simple as the cookie question will answer this.
3.What is worse? HE SAYS URANIAM AND PLUTONIUM, WHICH ARE ALWAYS KNOWN GAMMA EMITTERS, WHICH ARE ALWAYS DETECTABLE VIA GEIGER COUNTER AND ALWAYS THE EXAMPLE GIVEN IN THE COOKIE QUESTION UNLESS IT IS DEPLETED URANIUM, WHICH HAS NO NUCLEAR APPLICATION WHATSOEVER.I guess in Gordon’s “peer reviewed world, uranium and plutonium emit no ionizing radiation; they are beta and alpha only ya know. And he can’t back out and say “depleted Uranium” which is a beta and alpha emitter because he states “plutonium” which has no isotope that is beta and alpha only, Plutonium is ALWAYS gamma.
4.He then goes on to state : “Temperatures reach over 1 million degrees Fahrenheit and structural steel, concrete, human bodies or anything within 1-300 yards of “ground zero” is vaporized,” which is ALSO B.S. because any device that had materials with a half life of two days that could vaporize materials out to 300 yards would melt in a tenth of a second if it was ONLY THE SIZE OF A COKE CAN, half life means rate of radiological decay to half potential, which is always accompanied by decay heat, and in this case, HALF THAT HEAT WOULD BE EXPRESSED IN TWO DAYS INSIDE THAT COKE CAN. It would simply not exist long enough to even take a picture of it.
“Radiation is only 3% of a normal weapon, undetectable by geiger counter” is pure BS, with a half life of only 48 hours radiation will be EXTREME, and it has to be ionizing radiation (which is easy to detect) or it won’t trigger a nuclear weapons style chain reaction. And since ionizing radiation which is easy to detect can penetrate lead less than two inches thick, and a coke can being three inches across, even if the entire device was a nuclear shield it would not be big enough to block radiation from any plutonium or gamma emitting source at its core, and once again BETA AND ALPHA emitters are not suitable for nuclear weapons so his “harmful only if ingested” line is pure bunk.
5.And this next blooper by Duff is the ultimate shred, such a laughable slap in the face because it is a quote from Pons and Fleischmann’s cold fusion, which despite the fact that it works, does not apply to nukes AT ALL:Gordon stated:
“The theory is based on the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle. The theory is capable of explaining most of the experimentally observed results and also provides theoretical predictions. Experimental tests of theoretical predictions are proposed. Scalabilities of the observed effects are discussed based on theoretical predictions.”
Now THAT sounds REALLY COOL, does it not? Want to know where that statement came from? Fleischmann and Pons, with their COLD FUSION!!!! It sounds cool, but does not apply to Nukes AT ALL!!!
The errors are so extreme they make me wonder if this is a clandestine attempt to undermine the 911 truth movement, in fact all truth including the Fukushima report, where I state that a large device had to be used to conceal the decay heat. You can’t EVER put a nuke in a coke can no matter WHAT the form; the size limits are more on the order of a coffee can. Veterans Today has an enormous readership that posts everywhere thus making Duff’s report PURE DAMAGE to truth.
There are some cases where technology will NEVER overcome the laws of physics, we are NOT talking the latest “Ipod” when it comes to nukes!Gordon, if you don’t know when a topic is over your head, GET OUT of the business.
This was posted because I am now seriously questioning whether or not Gordon Duff is a good guy at all, I initially forgave him for this but now that he has come out against this web site I doubt he is for real, and if you still think so, READ THE ABOVE AGAIN, MORE SLOWLY, AND THINK. The errors are not innocent, they really do seem to be intentionally done to totally discredit the alternative media, it could not possibly be any more stupid. “peer reviewed?” what a horrible lie to tell and subsequently have echoed across the web.Gordon himself admits to publishing 40 percent disinfo ON PURPOSE. Dear Gordon: Just try to do what I did to your report with one of mine, while quoting solid scientific sources.
Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/07/from-jim-stone_28.html
Hey Jim
Gordon “I’m so well connected, I’m so rich” Fluff is a disinfo agent of the worst kind. For those who doubt this statement, please listen to his recent Red Ice Radio interview in which he shows his true colours. So pissed off and taken aback, Henrik made the full two hours available for free, as the last hour must be heard to be believed.
So arrogant and vain is Fluff, you’ll also notice that he uses photos of himself that are at least 20 years old. Yes folks, he has not aged gracefully. He also announced to the world that he made $80,000 in bond investments last month? And that this was proof positive that the American economy is in such great shape.
Do yourself a favour and hear this “stunning” interview.
WARNING!
It may not be good for your state of mind or for your physical health.