| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
MA: But, Nobody Wants to Take Your Guns!
We hear the tired old shibboleth trotted out in the debate over the second amendment again and again: “Nobody Wants To Take Your Guns”. Except when they do. Here is Boston Police Commissioner Bill Evans on Boston Public Radio, second hour, starting about 9:20:
“For the most part, nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle, and I don’t know a lot of people who are into hunting who, being lifelong residents, would actually want that who lives in the city, but, especially here in the city I want to have discretion over who’s getting any type of gun because public safety is my main concern and as you know it’s an uphill battle taking as many guns off the street right now without pumping more into the system.”
There are several minutes of ignorance of crime statistics and simple desire for more power over peoples lives shown in these few minutes of discussion. But what is abundantly clear is that the Police commissioner does not think people need any kind of guns in the city, and that the police should have full authority to decide who has one and who does not. At one point, the “moderator” says, well, if it was unconstitutional, then it would be unconstitutional for handguns as well, wouldn't it? Clearly the moderator never read the Heller decision. It is just as clear where her sympathies lie.
The police commissioner, several times says that he doesn't want people to have rifles or shotguns, because they might be stolen and used by criminals. Wow. So we will trample on the rights of honest people, because we are afraid that criminals will steal. It is obvious that he does not consider the right to be armed of any importance at all.
So, if you are from the 95 percent of the country where police cannot prevent you from owning guns, and you move to Massachusetts, the police commissioner thinks he should be able to tell you whether you can own one or not. And if he decides that you should not own them? I suspect that he will either come to take them or force you to turn them in.
The end game has always been to reduce the number of firearms owners until it is politically insignificant. The police commissioner is obviously miffed that it has not happened yet.
Yes, he wants to take your guns. Or he wants to decide whether or not you can have them. It amounts to the same thing.
©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch
Source: http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/07/ma-but-nobody-wants-to-take-your-guns.html
My response to any police officer or commissioner is this: I don’t see any war going on within the United States, though in-fact the police have killed more citizens in the last 3 years then were killed in the Afghanistan War. Thus, can you please explain the need for all police force units to have automatic weapons that shoot more than one round at the pull of a trigger? Can you explain why every single federal agency such as EPA, AGO, TSA, FEMA, DHS, Board of Education, and even the Post Office need specialized – militarized units as well as tanks? Can you please explain why the government for the last 30 years has funded every single terrorist organization that America is suppose to be fighting against? Now with all of this, can you again tell me why I a single citizen doesn’t need a few automatic weapons for myself? I personally don’t feel safe with you or anyone else trying to infringe on my 2nd amendment right to defend myself from the corrupt criminal government. Thus, when the time comes I may die, but I took an oath to defend the united States, and as GOD is my witness I’ll kill as many of you corrupt bastards as I can before my demise!
It all true what TruthandFreedom said besides the police commissioner looks like a dork.