MO:RKBA Amendment Results 5 August Election

(Before It's News)

Today is elections day in Missouri.   The race that I am watching is the Missouri Constitutional Amendment 5, which has been adamantly opposed by those who wish a disarmed population.  It is a clear stating of the right to keep and bear arms, clarifying that it is a fundamental right; that it protects ammunition and accessories as well as firearms; and that the State is obligated to protect that right.  Here is the ballot question and the actual amendment:

Official Ballot Title:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to include a declaration that the right to keep and bear arms is a unalienable right and that the state government is obligated to uphold that right?

State and local governmental entities should have no direct costs or savings from this proposal. However, the proposal’s passage will likely lead to increased litigation and criminal justice related costs. The total potential costs are unknown, but could be significant.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to expand the right to keep and bear arms to include ammunition and related accessories for such arms. This amendment also removes the language that states the right to keep and bear arms does not justify the wearing of concealed weapons. This amendment does not prevent the legislature from limiting the rights of certain felons and certain individuals adjudicated as having a mental disorder.

A “no”; [sic] vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution regarding arms, ammunition, and accessories for such arms.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes. 

Here is the actual constitutional amendment:

 Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories typical to the normal function of such arms, in defense of his home, person, family and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned
; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons. The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. Any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny and the state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the general assembly from enacting general laws which limit the rights of convicted violent felons or those duly adjudged mentally infirm by a court of competent jurisdiction.

The earliest returns have just come in  Amendment 5 is ahead with 74% of the vote in these very preliminary returns:

 

Constitutional Amendment 5   Yes  509    No 175   That is 4 precincts reporting out of  3898

 

Here is a link to the Secretary of State page.   The amendment results are at the bottom

 ©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

• Discovering the Fourth Dimension of Ourselves
• Hornady Zombie Max 7.62×39 ballistics and deconstruction (VIDEO)
• Developing WWIII Explained–Gaza, Ukraine, Iran, Iraq Set Up For Global War (Video And Picture)
• REPORT:  South Carolina Migrant Workers “Least Visible” Members of Community
• Eyewitness in NYPD Chokehold Murder Arrested on “Unrelated” Charges: “You’re mad because I filmed your boy.”
• Scientist Working on Gov’t Ebola Drug Joked about Culling Population with GMO Virus
• Timeline: Border Surge Began a Few Months After Obama’s First Executive Action on Immigration
• Saudi confirms testing man suspected of contracting Ebola
• Military Brain Technology Could Create “Lucy”-like Super Soldiers for a Day
• Mutant gene that allows people to need less sleep identified, scientists say