Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
This image of a VA letter revoking second amendment rights based on PTSD diagnosis appears to be legitimate. I do not recall ever seeing this type of revocation being challenged in the courts. As the decision is a bureaucratic one, not one that was made with due process through the courts, a challenge other than the appeal process might hold promise.
The point here is that the VA should not have the power to unilaterally make this decision without court oversight. The existence of an appeals process is not, in my opinion, sufficient due process. I do not know how the letter was delivered. Was it properly served as a legal document?
Lawyers, feel free to enlighten us. Is the sending of a notice of an appeal process considered sufficient as to constitute due process of law? Would a mere letter, sent by first class mail, meet legal requirements of service?
©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch