(Before It's News)
Paul Belial Williams originally (wrongly) claimed that Christians are tritheistic polytheists. He now (wrongly) claims we are modalistic unitarians. Notwithstanding his new error, since his present claim (i.e. Christians are unitarians) gives the lie to his original claim (Christians are polytheists), he now agrees with me that his original claim was a lie.
It would be nice if the above were an indication that PW is repentant. Instead, it is just an example of what happens to habitual liars: eventually they get caught in their own craftiness and wander into self-contradiction. PW seems to suffer from the same sickness as the author(s) of the Qur’an, who also could not seem to agree on whether or not Christians are monotheists (Q. 5:5 cf. 2:221) or polytheists ( ).
In his invincible ignorance, PW thinks that his change of mind is an indication that I reject the Athanasian Creed. He seems to deduce this from the following syllogism:
P1: I (PW) believe the Athanasian Creed teaches Social Trinitarianism
P2: Anthony rejects Social Trinitarianism
Therefore, Anthony rejects the Athanasian Creed.
However, PW gave no argument for his first premise. And since I have already rejected it, the onus is on PW to prove it. Moreover, I have shown that my interpretation is the historic interpretation of the church. I even referred to J. N. D. Kelly’s book on the history of Christian doctrine so PW would know where to begin his studies.
Laughably, PW concluded his screed by saying that I was going to fall back into the “it’s a mystery” defense. So far the only mystery apparent from our conversation is the mystery of wondering when PW will finally present an argument that he sticks by and that is cogent. So far he has only successfully shown us that he is a liar and doesn’t like being called one.
Source:
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/10/paul-beliar-williams-part-4.html