Playing God – Where Science Goes Horribly Wrong

29 October 2014

 - The National Academy of Sciences has published a shocking report which envisages a Chinese-style global one child policy as the only means of reversing climate change and reducing global population to a “sustainable” number of 1-2 billion people.

The paper, entitled Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems, even entertains the impact of world wars and global pandemics that wipe out 6 billion people as potential methods of combating the “threat posed to the environment by overpopulation”.

Crucially, the paper is edited by Stanford University’s Paul R. Ehrlich, a perennial advocate of population reduction whose dire proclamations about environmental catastrophes as a result of overpopulation have been proven wildly inaccurate time and time again.

Ehrlich has also expressed his support for mandatory population control, and co-authored a textbook that advocates putting drugs in the water supply to sterilize people, mandatory forced abortions, and a tyrannical eco-fascist dictatorship run by a “planetary regime.”