Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Shift to Bad Retirement Plans Threatens Retirees With Privation

Wednesday, October 8, 2014 22:17
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The United States’ largest employers are increasingly pushing their workers into inadequate retirement plans—and they acknowledge doing so.

Christopher Flavelle reports at Bloomberg:

A survey last month from Towers Watson, the employee benefit consultant, shows just how rapidly the defined-benefit plan—the traditional pension that guarantees workers an annual income after they retire—has moved from the norm at Fortune 500 companies to all but extinct. In 1998, just more than half offered new hires a defined-benefit plan; by 2013, that had fallen to just 7 percent.

That trend continues: According to Towers Watson, at least three of the 34 Fortune 500 companies that offered defined-benefit plans to new hires last year won’t do so this year.

Taking their place are defined-contribution plans, the 401(k)s and other such plans in which employers put money into an investment account in the worker’s name. In theory, employees can still save enough for retirement—if they put enough away, invest it wisely and engage in reasonable planning. But that’s not what usually happens—and according to another Towers Watson survey of large employers, they know it.

In 2012, Towers Watson asked 371 companies how well their employees understood and made good use of their retirement plans. In most cases, the companies answered that the workers fail to use their plans to their benefit.

Flavelle continues:

Defined-contribution plans rely on the premise that workers are making rational, informed decisions about their retirement. So companies’ responses are akin to admitting that the defined-contribution system is failing many of their employees. Which raises the question: If employers don’t think their workers can manage the shift to defined-contribution retirement plans, why make that shift?

Indeed. The relevant question is, whom does the shift benefit and how?

—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

Related Entries



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.