Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Follow TIS on Twitter: @Truth_is_Scary & Like TIS of Facebook- facebook.com/TruthisScary
The Moon Landing A Hoax?
For decades, people have debated whether or not the moon landing was real or fake – and it is still to this day a hotly debated subject. Moon landing a hoax? Moon landing not a hoax? If so, what would the reasons even be?
Scholars brush it off as mere conspiracy theory, but there are some interesting facts to back up the possibility that the moon landing was done on a soundstage. A great article recently published on Listverse called “10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax” [1] by Josh Fox lays out ten reasons the landing may have been a fake.
Fox says: The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to assert their victory in the space race over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon.
After the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky Dick to fake them to put America in good standing in the Cold War.In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA’s explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.
So, without further ado… “the list”….
The Waving Flag
Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag.
The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which is shown to shake in the video footage.
Lack of Impact Crater
The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon, there would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed there. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than it would have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible anyway – in the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip.
Multiple Light Sources
On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly show that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy theorists suggest that this must mean multiple light sources are present -suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set.NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the strange shadows, with subtle bumps and hills on the moon’s surface causing the discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some theorists; how could hills cause such large angular differences? In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.
Exactly and for some of us who can remeber the times, I know the technology of 1969. Then also if one goes into the tecnical points.
The lunar lander craft had to come from 7000km/h down to zero from the command module. Where is the command module now? Many, many other reasons not even mentioning the Van Allen belt about half way across to the moon and our sun will fry the astronauts like a microwave. 100% hoax yes
Now they are talking Mars………..dream on!!
There are many reasons pointing to this as being The Mother of All Hoaxes.
But as usual, the Bible provides the most compelling one.
“And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of Man which is in heaven”.
This is definitive.
ps Even the “ISS” is a ground-based further hoax.
YT has all the info.
1, the flag moving/ripping. This would be cause by the movements of the pole and lack of air and reduced gravity. As there is no air there is no air resistance to absorb the kinetic energy introduced by moving the flag also no noise would be produced so all that energy just keeps it rippling.
2. No impact crater, there was not enough forces to cause a crater, also its on legs which will have a certain amount of flex to absorbe the impact. If they hit the ground hard enough to leave an impact crater they will also have hit the lander just as hard due to newtons 3rd law. Aslo there is clearly a darker patch of lunar surface with clear shadows stretching over it underneath the lander, it is only a small amout of evidence but if you think about it the loose lunar soil which would have been blown away from the lander and dissapated over the landing zone blending the colour of scorched dust and fresh dust together giving the illusion of consistence surface colour in the immediate vicinity but on a large scale not captured by the picture you would see the colour change of the surface.
3. optical illusion cause by a 2D picture of a 3D landscape easily replicated by anyone with a camera on earth, the contours of the landscape are missed in the picture causing the shadows to apear to point in different directions.
4. Van allen belt, did cook the astronauts have you not see the skin of Buzz Aldrin that is not natural ageing, also many reported seeing flickering lights travelling around their vision, these are directly cause by alpha/beta radioactive particles passing through eyes/brain.
5. various possible explanations including smudges of moon dust, micro meteor impact residue, condensation inside the visor notice how it is only on the black open space reflection you can see it, this dark patch would mean more light exiting the visor than reflecting off.
6. if you do speed it up other actions carried out by astronauts such as tool manipulation, arm movements etc are clearly speed too not just moving this will indicate it is real time speed footage but not earth time, due to Einstein’s general relativity time would run slower on the moon than on earth due to reduced gravity. This effect is measurable with the distance GPS satellites are from the ground the moon has substantially less gravitational pull then earth so time would have been recorded slower on the footage making it seem slowed down.
7. the “C” I would agree with NASA, a hair would cause similar effect but I prefer the written on picture explanation, you can see as described it is a perfect “C” shape, no distortion caused by the uneven surface of the rock, even on earth rock have uneven surface and it is was a labelled prop the c would appear distorted by the face it is written on and there fore no be perfect, the conspirators own evidence disproves it as a hoax.
8. The cross hairs, this can be explained by simple camera functionality problem with contrast. If you look the cross hairs on the right edge of picture are clearly in front of the machinery. the only parts that appear to be behind are those in front of a white part of the gear. The contrast if the intense white reflected sun light saturate the file on the camera and blind out the dark lines causing an optical illusion. Just the same issues with lack of stars in the pictures.
9. The back drop does not match up perfectly only slightly but again this is a optical illusion again cause by 2D representation of a 3D worlds. If you drive down a long straight road and look at the horizon the further away objects are the less they seem to rotate relative to you the observer its the exact same effect.
10. very spurious and vague connections which are at best unfounded muses of lunatics. As we all know scenes in films may have one half filmed and edited in much later during the editing process as there where issues with the initial recordings, the t-shirt is a simple mistake by continuity managers.
If you are going to provide arguments discrediting the high achievements of the human race and the individual hard work performed by the many thousands of individuals who worked together to make the dream of space exploration a reality you could put in at least 1% of the effort they did. And further more with the sheer amount of people involved with the Apollo space program there are to many voices to silence, to many morally in-corruptible scientist who would have stood out and said something.
Not to mention the Russians. They would KNOW if it was faked. Why on Earth would they stay silent about that????
Arte Vespule -
see Anthony Sutton’s book “The Best Enemy Money Can Buy.” the Cold War was a contrivance, and the Soviet Union was funded by Wall Street industrialists:
http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/best_enemy/
there – the whole book is apparently online.
It’ Hollywood, nothing more.
The interview those astronauts gave after they “came back” was very strange. They did not act like they just accomplished the greatest feat of manknd. They acted weird and very suspicious. Something very wrong with it.
Flag was actually static: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/AldrinFlag-animation.gif
Everything America does has strings, mirrors, and manipulators in the background. This is the reason there are so many Alternative News Web sites, America has become the biggest liar and manipulator on the planet. No wonder we have a Kenyan born president.
The real hoax is this story as every single one of these 10 made up farces has been refuted years ago by scientists like Phil Plait on Bad Astronomy dot com.
Truth is not scary, scary is what some idiots will believe in place of truth.
Oh Look everybody, a gatekeeper
Oh Look everybody, another one of the house masters puppets!
Zero, you not worth the steam off my piss, cheers !
I love you too
Ah, The Holidays………just does something to you…doesn’t it?
It was known for a long time ago, but not for Americans. The same as all wars, all about money. Before go to over sea did any solder asked himself why is he go there? To save the life’s or to invade the country and make billions for Elite? All lies, I am sick of it.
And yet again…. nobody watches Myth Busters…
The one most obvious fact to argue, a man, has not been back to the moon in over 40 years tells the sane and awake people on earth, apollo never went to the moon with a man, ever.
So lets use that phony analogy of when a plane lands there’s no mark. BS, they make skid marks on the runway and if that fake apollo trash can landed on the moon, we should see clear drag marks of the landing pods scraping across the surface with moon dust blow away from where that 10,000 rocket thrust should have cleared that moon dust.
There is something very wrong with how reality is imagined by those who insist man went to the moon in a trash can, but never returned.
Ac will not work on the moon.
According to Vyatcheslav Krasheninnikov:
Demons grow human skin and put it on so as to look like us.
Demons will invite people to be healed inside their UFOs; those who go will be like zombies after.
Gov’t provides demons with diamonds and allows demons to abduct people.
If you’re being abducted, pray the Jesus prayer.
Demons use diamonds and souls to power their UFO craft.
The bigger the diamond, the more it lasts.
Demons have 4 UFO bases:
1)Moon
2)Inside fake mountain Kailash in Tibet
3)In lake Baikal in Russia
4)In Atlantis which is underneath the Mariana Trench in Pacific Ocean.
There are no aliens.
Nobody lives on other planets.
Airplanes that go down are hit by demons because they need the airspace to fight Jesus.