Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Opportunistic thieves now seem to recognize that they can take advantage of people’s perception of authority in police and the prevalence of violent police raids.
SWAT’s no-knock home invasions are increasingly used to serve non-violent drug warrants. This tactic conditions the public to stand down when masked thugs barge through the front door.
The video report below claims home invaders yelled “police” upon entering apparently to gain an easier advantage. The thieves shot one of the residents in the head and allegedly stole some things. They are still at large.
Think about that for a moment. We live in a society where home invaders can actually be mistaken for “legitimate” police work! How far has our society fallen to accept such a scenario?
And home invasions, whether executed by SWAT or petty crooks, always result in the same outcome for the victims; theft of property and possibly their lives.
When the actions of gangsters mimic the actions of “authorities”, you know we’ve got big problems with government.
Source: ABC13
I’m confused, which one is the criminal again?? is it the police that are the criminals or is it the criminals that are the criminals.. the lines have blurred to such a degree, it’s difficult to tell who’s who..
One steals money from hapless travelers, homeowners, business owners and calls it legal, so that they’re covered by immunity for their crimes
the other does exactly the same thing but they don’t work for the same people..
Both murder people, but again, the badged criminals have immunity from prosecution.
both rape people but only the badged criminals have immunity from prosecution.
both import and distribute drugs but only the badged criminals have immunity.
you can see my dilemma