OBAMACARE Reduced to 4 sentences

This summary was written by a Purdue engineer.    

Here are the 10,535 pages of ObamaCare condensed to 4 sentences...

1.   In order to insure the uninsured, we first have to uninsure the insured.

2.   Next, we require the newly uninsured to be re-insured. 

3.   To re-insure the newly re-insured, they are required to pay extra charges to be re-insured.

4.   The extra charges are required so that the original insured, who became uninsured, and then became 

       re-insured, can pay enough extra so that the original uninsured can be insured, which will be free of 

       charge to them. 

This, ladies and gentlemen, is called "redistribution of wealth" . . . or, by its more common name . . . 

SOCIALISM

Comments

Click here to cancel reply.

Your Comments

• desertspeaks

  Does ovomitcare actually apply to you?? Did you volunteer to be bound by it?

  Everyone has been told that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER;
  hearsay, opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions and presumptions aren’t proof of a damn thing.

  What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can anyone offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to as a state.

  Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution, nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey the CONstitution and laws.

  Your proof MUST be factual and first hand, you proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, opinions, beliefs, feelings, assumptions, presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s.

  Good luck!

  P.S. Indoctrination is defined as follows: “to teach somebody a belief, doctrine, or ideology thoroughly and systematically, especially with the goal of discouraging independent thought or the acceptance of other opinions”.

  Jan 3, 2015, 12:50 pm 0 Reply