| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
MH17 Historic flight paths altered to make flying into a war zone look “Normal”!
Deliberate act
This article will cover the evidence indicating MH17 was deliberately shot down, and that evidence is being systematically suppressed to an extent that makes a cover-up very obvious.
Flight set up to fail
This article originally started by pointing out that data on Flight Tracking web sites was changed from four days after the plane went down. Historic route data was changed to help cover over the fact that MH17 had been deliberately re-routed onto the battlefield. Something it had flown around on its previous flights.
Evidence covering many areas now presented
However now the article covers a broad range of evidence with supporting links and careful thought to tie it altogether. The article will keep getting improved as I find out more information. You can comment at the bottom of the article if you have anything to add.
My personally gathered evidence of a cover up inspiring this article
Prior to its tragic downing on July 17, flight MH17 had avoided the battlefield, flying around it at least back to the 6th. That was the oldest last day for which I could download data from the FlightAware.com web site. I took screenshots on the 20th of July (3 days after the event) of each day’s routing for MH17 dating back to the 6th. When I checked again on the 30th of July, all the historic map routing data had been changed! Its been changed to make it look like MH17 always flew over the war zone!
In reality (shown by my screen shots below) MH17 had carefully avoided flying over the battle zone since at least the 6th. By changing that historic record of map routing data to make it appear that MH17 always flew over the war zone, it allows media claims that Flight MH17 was not directed down an unusual path. In reality, there is even a kink in its flight path where it changed course to start flying into the battlefield kill zone. History has been re-written, and I present you with my screen shots to demonstrate that.
Details and Supporting Evidence
Was MH17′s fateful flight path its normal path?
I downloaded the flight paths for MH17 over the Ukraine going back from the 17th to the 6th of July some time ago (the history rolls off one day at a time). I gathered screen shots of the history so that I could see whether indeed MH17 had been directed into the War Zone deliberately on the 17th. i.e., the screen shots answered the question – Was it unusual for MH17 to fly over that hot war zone where aircraft were being shot down every other day? Well, MH17 wisely avoided the battle zone prior to the 17th. (Though history is being re-written, hence this article to show you)
Paths for 17th and 16th were different, and are marked on this map. FlightAware no longer shows this difference. Note normally MH17 flew below the pink coloured conflict zone.
Was the battlefield airspace supposed to be closed to traffic?
Malaysian Airlines got a bad rap over the lost flight MH370, but in reality they are a professional airline that people speak well of. Not surprisingly, every day since at least the 6th of July, they had avoided over-flying the war zone in the Ukraine. After all, many military aircraft were being shot down there. Roughly one every two days. At very least, the US/Canada/France/UK/Aus had told their airlines not to fly over the battle zone. Malaysian Airlines was sensible in following suit. Note also, that Russia had closed its air space boundary with the battlefield about 12 hours earlier, well before the MH17 departed. That meant that if an airline wanted to fly over the battle zone, it officially had no continuation flight path out the other side. Here’s proof:
Many airlines not flying over war zone
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23212812-post288.html
This is interesting. A NOTAM issued by URRV (Rostov Flight Information Region) today, 17 July, at 0000 announced the closure of the air route MH17 filed to fly:
URRV V6158/14 17JUL0000-31AUG2359 ESTDUE TO COMBAT ACTIONS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE UKRAINE NEAR THE STATE BORDER WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE FACTS OF FRNG FM THE TERRITORY OF THE UKRAINE TOWARDS THE TERRITORY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION, TO ENSURE INTL FLT SAFETY, ATS RTE SEGMENTS CLSD AS FLW:A100 MIMRA – ROSTOV-NA-DONU VOR/DME (RND),B145 KANON – ASMIL,G247 MIMRA – BAGAYEVSKIY NDB (BA),A87 TAMAK – SARNA
MH17 departed some hours after this NOTAM took effect.
Note that it was Russia that forced the closure of the war zone to civilian air traffic. Why did the US/Ukraine leave it open? Ukraine for political reasons ordered a no fly zone over the Crimea, which was a perfectly safe area. Did the US/Ukraine want an “incident” to occur? It certainly gave them a free hand for a very bloody campaign while maintaining sympathy from the western public.
Now that said, according to pprune.org , a blog for professional pilots, its absolutely normal for airlines and pilots to either ignore, or be unaware of “no fly” zones. Even when say an army is conducting missile tests. According to pprune, the system is very lax. But nonetheless, the Ukraine war is very well publicised, and Flight Controllers in the Ukraine and Poland would have been notified that Russia had effectively closed the battle space to all air traffic 12 hours before MH17 went down. No excuse for the Air Traffic Control ATC to ignore that. Incredible really. News reports were suggesting Polish Air Traffic Control may have given the initial command to fly over the War zone, because the flight route first deviates from normal over polish air space (maps are at the bottom of this page showing that). But this is a coordinated effort, as I hope to prove as we progress through the case.
FlightAware.com – Flight route history changed – Cover Up
On 29 July 2014 I saw that some people were saying that Flight Tracker type web sites had their data changed for MH17 some days after it went down. Others were just confused how people could present historic flight paths that were totally contradictory for the same days. Now I know why.
When I went back to Flight Aware, all data had rolled off except for the 16th, and the blighters wanted to charge for their history! (one day less history than they used to have too). I’d originally downloaded the 6th through 16th on the 20th of July, just three days after MH17 went down. So I have the original flight paths leading up to the disaster. Other people on the web say that it was after three days that the data was changed. So I went back to FlightAware and checked. What do you know – now when I look at the 16th, MH17 magically is flying down the middle of a hot war zone! Something it apparently didn’t do on the 16th when I took a screen shot three days after the disaster!!!
The data on FlightAware has been changed to cover up the fact that MH17 was flying around the war zone and not through it, until the 17th. Note initial news reports noted the new route over the battlefield, and the initial explanation for its dangerous route was bad weather meant it was redirected north. (someone said 400 miles north, correct me if that’s wrong) Later it was denied that it was directed north due to bad weather and no further explanation has been given for the changed route.
The weather according to weather underground at a Crimean weather station, nearer the original flight route appears normal as well. Obviously there might be a local storm somewhere, but for the moment, no one is claiming anything but normal weather anyway.
No storm, so no excuse for redirecting flight into the war zone
According to web reports, there is a good chance that ALL flight history trackers have been changed now. Some people claim it happened after three days. I got my original untouched routing data on the third day. I can prove the flight route data on flightaware.com has been changed to make that dangerous route look normal, when it was not taken in the past. I analyse FlightAware, but others say for example that the same thing has happened on FlightRadar24.
Why change the flight history – Is this significant? You bet!
Why change the flight route history? Well, if you want to down a jet and blame it on your enemy for political advantage, you might simply have Air Traffic Control re-direct a civilian jet into a hot battlefield. If MH17 was re-directed into an obviously dangerous area, that implies pre-meditation. A set up. As soon as MH17 went down, western leaders started blaming Russia, and Vladimir Putin personally. i.e., accusing someone with what they knew to be fake evidence of pre-meditated mass murder. Doing it publicly and stirring up a lynch mob. Essentially a declaration of war.
Oh, and I really enjoyed this tweet after the Russians released hard evidence on what had happened.
Faked Audio Admission From Russian Army Officer
Note the US and its allies were blaming Russia for deliberately downing a civilian airliner. That was despite the fact that they were all in possession of the Ukraine/USA’s very obviously fake audio “evidence” of a bizarre audio conversation between a Russian Army Officer and a Militiaman. Note that the bizarre dialogue in the audio should have made anyone suspicious it was fake, even by listening to small segments of it in news reports. Just think for a moment. Would any army officer in this day and age respond to being told his men shot down a civilian airliner by saying: “They must have been spies”? Absolutely bizarre, and that was the short clip of the dialogue translated and spoken in English by actors for western TV. The rest of the dialogue is said to be just as odd.
Subsequently Russia has stated that the audio is spliced from multiple conversations, they say their are obvious pauses in the dialogue where splicing has occurred. (I don’t speak Russian, so cannot verify that personally) They say there are time codes left in it from editing software, and that splicing is why the dialogue makes little sense. They say that is a sign those involved did not have enough recorded material to work with in splicing it together. They say the fake is poorly done, and that if they were doing it, they would have done it better! [Note the Russian sense of humour - I had thought all Russians had their sense of humour surgically removed at birth!]……
