Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Have you ever wondered about people in the past, what their lives were like, what they did, what they thought about, what they carried in their pockets? Well, the contents of Abraham Lincoln’s pockets are on display today at the Library of Congress.
What someone carries with them can tell us a great deal about them. Interestingly enough, I came across this story on a blade forum I am a member of, as I collect knives—traditional, folders, and fixed blades. I am also into EDC (every day carry). This story was of great interest to me and caught my eye, and it revealed much about former U.S. President, Abraham Lincoln.
According to U.S. News and World Report:
After John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln in Ford’s Theatre on April 14, 1865, the Brooks Brothers overcoat the president wore that evening was handed over to his son, Robert Todd. Today, the items from the pockets of the coat are on display at the Library of Congress, about two miles from Ford’s Theatre. At a talk Wednesday, the library’s rare book and special collections division chief Mark Dimunation said the items would help “understand Lincoln in human terms.”
To wit, the way the 16th president fretted about his spectacles. One pair was kept in his pocket for reading, the second for other kinds of viewing. According to Dimunation, Lincoln likely carried the pocket knife because the arms on his glasses had a bad habit of loosening. His concern was justified: Lincoln had strabismus, a visual problem that meant he could not always look people in the eye, and he was farsighted with a diminishing ability to see objects nearby.
The night Abraham Lincoln was shot, he was carrying: a pocket knife, a watch fob, an Irish linen handkerchief, a brown leather wallet, a crisp new Confederate five-dollar bill, two pairs of gold-rimmed spectacles (one held together with string), and eight newspaper clippings, some of which echoed remarks from one of his campaign speeches – that a country divided against itself cannot stand.
There was alot of curiosity and mystery surrounding the five-dollar Confederate bill in his pocket. And the newspaper clippings he carried seemed to be a positive reminder for Lincoln.
According to U.S. News and World Report:
There is also the curious matter of the five-dollar Confederate bill, which Dimunation said, repeating an old joke, was so Lincoln was “prepared for all contingencies.” The president is believed to have acquired the bill as a souvenir (of a war won? or what could have been?) when he visited Richmond and Petersburg, Va., just as the Civil War was drawing to a close.
The eight newspaper clippings Lincoln carried were largely positive portrayals of his leadership, but Dimunation stressed that they were less proof of a president’s ego than of a man who needed reassurance. “It was a very tough re-election for Lincoln. The war had worn him down… The articles would have been very affirming to him,” he said.
But, it doesn’t stop there, in fact, it gets even more intersting! Inside of Lincoln’s pocket watch was a hidden message that Lincoln himself had no knowledge of!
(Above: Abraham Lincoln’s ivory, folding pocket knife and glasses held together by a simple piece of string. Seen in the background is his pocket watch, mentioned below)
Smithsonian News Reported:
On April 13, 1861, Irish immigrant and watchmaker Jonathan Dillon, working for the M.W. Galt and Co. jewelers in Washington, D.C., was repairing President Abraham Lincoln’s pocket watch, when he heard of the attack. Forty-five years later, Dillon told the New York Times what he did that day.
“I was in the act of screwing on the dial when Mr. Galt announced the news. I unscrewed the dial, and with a sharp instrument wrote on the metal beneath: ‘The first gun is fired. Slavery is dead. Thank God we have a President who at least will try.’”
(Above: Actual photo of the inside of Abraham Lincoln’s pocket watch)
Yet, many years later, when the watch was actually opened, this isn’t at all what it said! The actual message was nothing like the message that Dillon claimed. But why would Dillon have lied?
Smithsonian News goes on to report:
This story is full of ironies. And so we must pause here to reflect on one. It was February 12, Lincoln’s 200th birthday, when the phone on Rubenstein’s desk rang. The caller was Douglas Stiles, a 59-year-old attorney and genealogy expert, from Waukegan, Illinois. Stiles is also Dillon’s great, great grandson.
The evidence was not overwhelming. All that Stiles had to offer was a bit of family lore and a newspaper article written 45 years after the fact. Could the stranger calling convince a museum curator to pull a national icon from display, to bring in an expert craftsman to disassemble the delicate, historical artifact, and to take a huge chance that nothing, in fact, could be there? But, Rubenstein’s interest was piqued and the decision was made. ”It’s sort of amazing,” Rubenstein said in an interview last week before the watch was opened, “when you think that two years before the Emancipation Proclamation, Abraham Lincoln is carrying this hopeful message in his pocket, and never knowing it.”
A month after that initial call, in an elegant museum back room, photographers crowded around jeweler George Thomas who was seated at a makeshift craftsman’s bench. As the hour approached, Rubenstein solemnly stepped forward. Lincoln’s gold pocket watch was delivered to the bench.
So when the watch was dismantled, what was really inscribed on the inside? Douglas Stiles was invited to read aloud his ancestor’s inscription:
“Jonathan Dillon April 13-1861 Fort Sumpter [sic] was attacked by the rebels on the above date J Dillon April 13-1861 Washington thank God we have a government Jonth Dillon.”
The message was there. Yet there is no mention of slavery, nor did it say anywhere that Lincoln was the right man for the job.
So why did Dillon tell the news, many years prior, that the inscription read something altogether different? We may never know. Maybe some things are meant to remain mysteries.
(Above Photo: A close up of Abraham Lincoln’s ivory pocket knife he was carrying the day he was shot.)
Here’s one of my own (Lyn Leahz) newest additions in bone with a special German crafted blade:
And, here’s my latest that I just recieved the other day (French Douk Douk and Boker Mini Gnome in Olive Drab Micarta Finish):
Finally, here is what I carry pretty much every day, give or take a few (Zippo windproof, weatherproof lighter, two Opinel No. 7, reading glasses, Swiss Army Expedition Knife, Paracord, Field Notes, Cell Phone, and L10C 4-mode, 120 Lumen flashlight):
What types of things do you carry daily? Are you a prepper or into EDC?
Would you people summarize your stories, this is 2015 after all and I learned nothing. A paragraph at most is needed to provide significance.
I know why Dillon lied.
Integral to the Northern mythology about the war AFTER the fact, was the notion that it was some grande crusade against slavery.
This is much more comforting to them than admitting it was really about economic issues and controlling trade with Europe.
Dillon may have wanted to believe what he said was true, and made it true in his own mind, for the same reason that the Official History of the Civil War claims that it was some sort of Grande Crusade against Slavery.
-Ken
LaserGuidedLoogie
Agreed except the propaganda started during the war.
He just forgot, it was a spur of the moment thing It was a long time. … and he was Irish.Nothing about what he actually wrote was memorable. I’ve forgotten it already and i just read it.
I did not know Lincoln (the big mean tyrant) carried “girlie” pocket knives. My knives are Bowie size or larger cuz like Crocodile Dundee said “…now that’s a knife!”
Interesting Angle #2.
Signed,
Charlie (on the cutting edge).
Please, please just die.
“Girlie pocket knife”
It’s well known that Lincoln like to whittle. He would do it during conversations, he did it sitting on his porch, etc. This was probably his his whittling knife.
Yes yet another war brought to you by TPTB for their profit, slavery was a cover story of which TPTB were laughing at you about.
The civil war was fought over states rights not slavery which was a side issue. In fact slavery was on the decline with the advent of modern manufacturing methods and the industrial revolution slavery was actually becoming to expensive. It would have been gone by the 1870′s without the war. Lincoln had proposed a returning of Blacks back to Africa but the senate voted it down because of expense. But the real reason was to use the Blacks as a political manipulation tool to break unions, to cause division and to use them as a voting block for the elitist’s agenda. They are still being used in this manner to this day.
Lincoln even said that if he could win the war without freeing a single slave, he would.
You are confusing Lincoln with Washington.. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/george-washington-used-legal-loopholes-avoid-freeing-his-slaves-180954283/
Oh, my little Angle is a scholar! I’m so proud! I want to be loud – and yell SHE WORKS FOR ME!!
Signed,
Charlie (and his big mouth).
We all know who Lyn works for Slime and it ain’t Charlie the talking horse.
She has the odor of salted pork and sweet pineapple all over her.
Don’t be Jelly boy. It unbecoming of a white CHRISTO-CREEEP like you.
From lincolns speech, August 22 1862
“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it”
Wow you can read and repeat. Too bad you can’t think.
Interesting article, thanks.
My jaw dropped, and my bones were chilled, when I discovered no obvious references to nephilim or raphaim in this story.
Is it just me, or is Ms Leahz starting to develop a new focus for her investigative talents?
Is she still fighting the war on hell?
We need to be told.
No, she changed her hobby to history and knives. I like it.
…..Wait! ….. Lynn ….. PUT DOWN THAT KNIFE….Lynn….. back away….. BACK AWAY I TELL YOU! Its me, Charlie…….you remember?!?
———————————————————–
Phew!!!
I can see that maybe Jonathan Dillon’s message inside the watch could have been altered in his own mind in subsequent decades as his perspectives changed, and he felt an appreciation and love for the president, especially after the president was assassinated. Dillon probably did not intend to lie.
I have always loved Lincoln and don’t for a minute subscribe to the nay saying of Thomas DiLorenzo and other Catholic Lincoln haters. Lincoln had more decency, goodness and character in the tip of his little finger than in all of them put together.
Is that “gay”, like am123anarsehole, and all of his “christ-HOLE butt-buddies” that will rule heaven with the IMAGE of a white-skinned mangod for all of eternity????
Put down the vodka and back away.
That is Counterfeit CrowPie, My Evil doppelganger.
He has stolen my ID and my avatar.
You can check the UrL number and see the difference by hovering your mouse over the names.
Not only does he talk nasty…He hates Christians….(whispers) he doesn’t wash.
That is a BIG FAT lie CrowPie.
I wash all the time….. but it’s with a gravy and mayonnaise glaze… and I always do it with a spanish onion in my mouth and a fine rice pilaf in my pig butt.
It’s true. Check it out, the comment above yours comes from user number 279/774
The christo-creep crowpie comment came from user number 393/552
No condoms in Abe’s pocket? I always figured Lincoln for a Trojan Man….
Hi Lyn,
I prep as the Bible warns that I should for these coming times.
As always I enjoy your articles, keep up the Good Work.
Says to me your scared Lyn and you want people to know you carry a knife!
Did Jesus carry a knife?….black Jesus did!, but not white Jesus! I know this cause God told me yesterday!…”she has huge boobs” and well be sending back new improved Asian Jesus “in a spaceship” cause there’s heaps more Asian christian people today and it all about the numbers! She doesn’t want the Asians to feel left out, she says black and white people have had there turn with Jesus, well be updating the bible yet again with small changes eg:…Jesus fed the masses with rice! Jesus was born in a rice paddy! Jesus was beheaded and raised 3 days later that sort of thing.