The intention of such a highly visible deployment was to send a signal, Gen Hodges said.
“That's exactly what it was about, reassuring our allies,” he said.
Gen Hodges pointed to recent Russian decisions to move Iskandar ballistic missiles to its Kaliningrad enclave, between Lithuania and
Poland, and long-range nuclear-capable bombers to Crimea.
“I don't think a military confrontation is inevitable. But you have to be militarily ready in order to enable effective diplomacy,” he said.
“The best insurance we have against a showdown is that Nato stands together.”
Since taking over command of the US army in Europe last year, Gen Hodges has found himself on the front line of an increasingly nervous stand-off with Vladimir Putin's Russia.
A year after it pulled its last tank out of Europe, the US is sending hundreds of tanks and heavy fighting vehicles back to the continent, and Gen Hodges is in the middle of talks over where to position them.
“I think the question for each country to ask is: are they security consumers or security providers?” Gen Hodges said. “Do they bring capabilities the alliance needs?”
Russian President Vladimir Putin listens during an annual call-in show on Russian television “Conversation With Vladimir Putin” in Moscow
“My experience of the UK is principally of the British army, and they are one of the best armies in the world,” he said. “They have extremely capable officers and NCOs.
“The relationship between the US and the UK is as strong as ever and we are always looking for ways to strengthen it. We need the capability that the British bring. They've been by our side in everything we've done.
“We've got our own challenges in the US army. Globally countries are facing pressure on defence spending, including the US.
“I'm confident the UK will live up to its responsibilities.”
In recent years, while Western countries have been cutting their defence budgets, Russia has been spending heavily on modernising its military.
“We're not interested in a fair fight with anyone,” Gen Hodges said. “We want to have overmatch in all systems. I don't think that we've fallen behind but Russia has closed the gap in certain capabilities. We don't want them to close that gap.”
The recent involvement of Russian forces in fighting in eastern
Ukraine has shown that they have made huge advances, particularly in electronic warfare, Gen Hodges said.
But he doesn't think this is the start of a new Cold War.
“That was a different situation, with gigantic forces and large numbers of nuclear weapons,” he said. “The only thing that is similar now is that Russia and Nato have different views about what the security environment in Europe should be.
“I don't think it's the same as the Cold War. We did very specific things then that are no longer relevant. We don't need 300,000 soldiers in Europe. Nobody can afford that any more.
“We want to see Russia back in the international community and cooperating against Islamic terrorism and on Iran's nuclear ambitions. That's different from the Cold War.”
Gen Hodges has an easy manner with the men under his command, making jokes and asking the opinions of the most junior privates, as well as senior officers.
He has combat experience as a brigade commander in Iraq, but in his current role he has to deal with different challenges.
A Russian Federation Air Force Su-27 Sukhoi fighter aircraft during a training exercise
“I'm sure they're not going to line up Russian tanks and go rolling into another country,” he said. “They don't want a military confrontation with Nato. Our alliance is the most successful alliance in history and it has a lot of capability.”
Russia will not risk an open attack on a Nato member, he believes, for fear the alliance will invoke Article V of its treaty, under which an attack on one member is an attack on all.
Instead, the danger is that Russia will seek to put pressure on Nato members on its borders through other means.
“Russia doesn't want to let the temperature reach 100C, they want to keep the temperature at 90C, 95C, but they try to keep it under 100C,” he said.
“There's information, economic pressure, border violations. There are different ways of keeping the pressure up. They don't want a clear attack, they want a situation where all 28 [Nato member countries] won't say there's a clear attack.”
He pointed to the large Russian-speaking populations in the Baltic countries, and the economic power Russia has as a major consumer of eastern European agricultural produce, as possible avenues Mr Putin may try to exploit.
But he said that Nato remains united in the face of Russian aggression.
Credit to The Telegraph
Oddly enough, Russia isn’t the one amassing weapons of war throughout Europe, that would be the US!