‘Surveillance State Repeal’ Bill Gets Bipartisan Support

(Before It's News)

A bipartisan group of lawmakers is planning to push for a new bill to stop the federal government from forcing tech companies from giving it access to customer emails, texts and photos.

Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., is spearheading the proposed legislation—called the Surveillance State Repeal Act—with the help of five co-sponsors, including Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. Pocan plans to present it when Congress comes back from its two-week recess on April 12. The bill will also stop the government from forcing companies to allow back door access that bypasses security protocols for their customers’ privacy.

USA Today reports:

FBI Director James Comey has publicly chastised tech companies for installing automatic encryption into their devices and has urged Congress to pass legislation that would prohibit it. Attorney General Eric Holder also has weighed in, saying that quick access to phone data can help law enforcement officers find victims snatched by kidnappers and child molesters.

“Encryption threatens to lead us all to a very, very dark place,” Comey said during a public appearance at the Brookings Institution in October. “Have we become so mistrustful of government and law enforcement in particular that we are willing to let bad guys walk away, willing to leave victims in search of justice?”

In an age of increased privacy concerns, there is no way that Congress would pass a bill to give the government greater access to electronic communications, said Patrick Eddington, the Cato Institute’s policy analyst for homeland security and civil liberties.

“If anyone tried to bring up a bill that would mandate backdoors, it would fail by probably 300 votes in the House of Representatives,” he said.

Eddington said the idea that encryption alone is going to shut down law enforcement is “absurd

“The mass surveillance that the NSA and FBI have developed didn’t stop the underwear bomber, the Boston Marathon bomber or the shootings at Fort Hood,” he said. Eddington and other critics of mass surveillance say law enforcement agencies achieve better results with targeted surveillance of suspected criminals carried out with warrants.

Read more here.

—Posted by Donald Kaufman. 

Related Entries

• April 7, 2015 Of All the Historic Upheavals in the Middle East, the U.S.-Iran Nuclear Deal Is One of the Biggest
• April 6, 2015 How to Read the Iran Debate

• Exploited and Sexually Abused Qatari Migrant Workers Forced To Run Marathon
• GRIMERICA TALK RADIO : Grimerica Talks Ancient Egypt and “The Secret Chamber of Osiris” with Scott Creighton
• Nuclear submarine catches fire at Russian shipyard
• “I Don’t Recall That, Sir.” Testifies Ohio Cop Who Fired 15 Rounds Into Car While Standing On the Hood
• The Alternative To Long-Term Austerity: Less Work, Higher Wages: No Mere Utopian Dream
• US TV host Bill Maher compares One Direction member to Tsarnaev
• Rand Paul officially announces presidential bid
• VIDEO:CERN Scientists Admit They Can Open Parallel Universes Create Black Holes, and Communicate With Potential Interdimensional Beings.
• L. Neil Smith’s THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE–A Difference That Makes No Difference
• Israel, U.S. Lawmakers Press Case Against Iran Nuclear Deal