Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Greg Ericson (Editor)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Where’s NASA’s Close Up Photographs of the Moon, Mars Etc.?

Sunday, April 5, 2015 13:14
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

According to CNN, satellites can pick up a rabbit hole under bushes, and the disturbance caused by shotgun shells.

Satellites have 30cm resolution now.

They can track ships to witness crimes in real time

They can  monitor a specific ship from port to port.

www.ericsonreport.com

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 8 comments
  • I may have the highest res photo of the moon in public possession. And get this: it is in COLOR!. Crazy why our nasholes don’t bother to point the Hubble at Aristarchus and see why the hell it glows. If you would like to acquire a copy see: LUNA REVEALED
    http://youtu.be/nxX0eHm0oTY

    This no-go, no-show moon mystery defines the state of unknowingness that we are perpetually kept in. Think that fluoride is having no real effect? Ya’ll happy ain’t ya? Broke, but there is a game on.

    There is an informational matrix and it is so upon us that we can’t see it. We see not the forest because of (for) the trees. We only see the close-up of happy america while the civilized world is destroyed in our name.

    As a seeker and writer of truth I am one of the few ever banned by BIN. My work such as: “Tsarnev’s May Be Innocent!” and “No Miranda Rights For You!” are disappeared. Along with the above moon discussion/video.

    Of this, I am actually rather proud. Virtual journalistic street cred as it were.

    I think, however, it was this posting that got my thinking memory-holed. This is why they don’t want you to understand the moon and a thousand other points of light that they shroud in darkness.

    Why, you ask? Because they don’t want you to feel special and powerful like your actually are.

    FREE STATE AGENDA
    http://www.dgvor.com/free-state-agenda.html

  • At the distance of the Moon, Hubble has a resolution of 80-100 meters.

    The LRO and other lunar orbiters have a resolution of about half a meter.

    Which would be 50 cm.

    • I’d take either. Thanks for the tech note. How pixel dense is that potential “image”? Maybe 4000 pix across? Also the moon is so unbelievably bright – like a volleyball in the direct sun, but with no atmosphere. See this highest-resolution image in the public domain and at an appropriate exposure. And in COLOR!

      LUNA REVEALED
      http://youtu.be/nxX0eHm0oTY

  • NASA, what a waste of everything.

  • It’s is illegal for Astronomers to take close up Images of the Moon or Mars because everyone would want to see the Apollo Landing sites and they are not there. Satellites are not allowed to look at the Moon and take images even though they could see a Dime on the Moon’s surface. The problem is if you look at the Moon you would find out the Gov. Lied to us about there not being Aliens or that we landed on the Moon. Mar’s Rover landed in a desert Crater that NASA knew had nothing in it or very little but on the Poles where the Water is are Shrubs. The reason NASA lies about everything is the same reason Obama lies about everything, they think the public are idiots. If an Astronomer points a very large telescope at the Moon aimed at any of the Apollo landing sites Sirens go off and security arrests them immediately, it’s happened before.

    • Just found this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ro2NvJkHUA great work Bill! Comes up with an image representing 65 mile across crater resolved to about 400 pixels maybe.

    • Lunar orbiter pictures are around half-meter resolution, one pixel per one-half meter. Not good enough to see
      details like spaceships.

      Hubble, which is better than telescopes on Earth, has 80-100 meter resolution at the distance of the Moon.
      (depending on who you ask)

      I’m not convinced we’ve seen any actual pictures from Mars. Every time I see one, it looks like desert terrain
      on Earth.

      I know for sure we haven’t seen any actual pictures from the Moon, not from the US, not from Surveyor and not from Apollo. Because the moon is too bright in the pictures.

      The Moon absorbs 90%-92% of the light that strikes it. Compared to a white spacesuit, it should be dark gray, or black.

  • nasa are luciferians and a bunch of liars at that! The American citizens have been flimflammed by the nasa devil worshipping heathenistic cult for far too long! Laugh now nasa cry later. We will see who gets the last laugh, just like your fake @ss moon landing. :lol: :cry:

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.