| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
NWO Feuding! Hillary Under Attack By Rothschild And Sulzberg’s New York Times!
Barack Obama and his ‘organ grinder’ overlord, Evelyn David de Rothschild, are out to destroy Hillary Clinton’s chances of becoming the next American Dictator. (Not that there is going to be another election anyway)
The latest Clinton/Blumenthal email leaks coming from the Obama regime and being publicized by the New York Times are clearly the result of an ongoing feud between the Bush ,Clinton, Rockefeller faction of the New World Order and the Obama, Rothschild, Windsor faction, who are now about to let the hammer down on the dollar and destroy the USA. Maybe the Clintons and Bushes are getting a bit concerned about losing their billions, and perhaps, even winding up in detention centers along with all of Obama’s other enemies. That would be just about most Christians and all white Americans who will not bow down and kiss the ring….
I believe we may about to see some real time fireworks between the two factions…. know what I mean? (Rev 13;3)
Also see the Obama prophecies….what’s coming is all in there.
A little background on the New York Times..…The Rothschild and Sulzberg clans have always been close.
“My conclusion is simple. Nepotism works.”
- Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, (1926 -2012), publisher of the New York Times, “a tightly held family operation since 1896.”“In the three years since 9-11, we’ve begun to understand that it’s possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
- New York Times, “The Public Knowledge of 9/11,” September 11, 2004
On December 30, 2012, the New York Times published a disturbing anti-American editorial entitled “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” written by Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University. As it was surely intended to do, the editorial caused a great deal of consternation among patriotic Americans.
Louis Michael Seidman, a scion of the B’nai B’rith, penned the editorial trashing the U.S. Constitution.
Seidman’s piece claims that “obedience to the Constitution” with its “downright evil provisions” is responsible for the “broken” American system of government:
As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.
It is, however, not obedience but disobedience to the Constitution, exactly like that promoted by Seidman, that is behind the “broken” state of our system of government. The most egregious examples of this Constitutional disobedience are the continuous violations of Article I, Section 8, in which the powers of Congress are specified:
The Congress shall have Power…
To coin money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin… and
To declare War…
For the past century Congress has completely abdicated its power to coin money by allowing U.S. currency to be issued by a cartel of privately-owned banks known as the Federal Reserve System. Secondly, the U.S. has waged numerous wars around the world during the past 65 years not one of which was declared by Congress. These two blatant violations of the Constitution are responsible for most of the financial problems currently faced by the U.S. government.
A constitution is a body of fundamental principles according to which a state is governed. To say we should “give up on the Constitution” is to say we should give up on the American system of government. For alternatives to the American system, Seidman points to nations like Britain and New Zealand, nations which have no constitution. The revolutionary difference of the American system is that in the United States the people are sovereign while in Britain and New Zealand it is the Queen of England who is sovereign. The American Revolution was fought over that difference.
The revolutionary concept of American popular sovereignty is contained in the first three words of the Constitution: We The People. As Benjamin Franklin said, “In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns.”
So why would the New York Times publish an anti-American editorial that calls for giving up the Constitution and the system of government it provides? To understand this we need to understand what the New York Times is, and who it really represents.
The editor of the editorial page of the New York Times is Andrew Rosenthal, who oversees the paper’s opinion pages. The editorial department of the paper is completely separate from the news operations and Mr. Rosenthal answers directly to the publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
The New York Times is a family-owned newspaper, controlled by the Sulzberger family. The paper is owned by The New York Times Company, which publishes 18 other newspapers, including the International Herald Tribune and The Boston Globe. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. is the chairman of the company and his family has controlled the paper since 1896.
The Sulzberger family is a Jewish family from Baden, in southern Germany. The Sulzbergers are closely tied to the Rothschild family, which comes from the same part of Germany. Ferdinand Sulzberger, for example, was the first of the Sulzbergers from Baden to immigrate to America. Before coming to America, Sulzberger studied business in a mercantile firm in Frankfurt, the home of the Rothschild family. He probably worked with the Rothschilds. Subsequently, after making a fortune in America with his meat packing business, Sulzberger’s daughter Lily married Victor Sydney Rothschild, the eldest son of Victor Henry Rothschild. The two fathers served on the board of trustees of Temple Beth-El on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
One of the most significant connections between the Sulzberger and Rothschild families is that they both belong to the leadership level of the Jewish Zionist secret society known as the International Order of B’nai B’rith. Louis Michael Seidman’s grandfather was a president of the Victory Lodge 1481 of B’nai B’rith. The younger generations of these families are surely members of the same secret society – but keep it secret.
The Sulzberger and Rothschild families have long conspired together to change the world to suit their agenda. Some of their global plans have been published in the pages of the New York Times, which has served as their media megaphone for the past century. In 1907, for example, the paper carried an article entitled “Will People the West with the Russian Jews.”
The Sulzberger and Rothschild families work together to advance their global agenda. Their project in 1907 to populate the American West with Russian Jews is just one example.
In the article, Cyrus L. Sulzberger (of the family that controls the NYT) announced that he was heading a project to bring large numbers of Russian Jews directly to Galveston, Texas. The project to populate the American West with Russian Jews was funded by Jacob H. Schiff and the Rothschild family. It is interesting to note that the emigration project was not a U.S. government initiative but was first conceived and announced in London, where the treasurer for the operation was Leopold de Rothschild. The B’nai B’rith and these same Zionist families had operated similar Jewish emigration programs in Eastern Europe for decades.
Understanding that the Sulzberger family controlling the New York Times is closely connected to the Rothschilds, the leading family of British Zionists, may help explain why they published the Seidman piece trashing the U.S. Constitution. This connection also explains why the New York Times published an editorial on the third anniversary of 9-11, which said, “…we’ve begun to understand that it’s possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
The New York Times, which should have conducted its own investigation, actually played a key role in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11. Three years later the paper told its readers that they did not need to know what happened on 9-11. Why would the leading newspaper in the city in which 3,000 people were killed on 9-11 say such a thing?
The Sulzberger-owned paper published that editorial for the same reason it published the propaganda pieces by Judith Miller, which falsely claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction: to advance the rapacious agenda of the Rothschild family and their Zionist state of Israel.
The state of Israel serves as the operational arm and iron fist of the British Zionist movement, which is headed by the Rothschild family. The Balfour Declaration in 1917, for example, which first promised Britain’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” was addressed to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, after all.
For the Sulzberger and Rothschild families the United States is a nation they seek to control and dominate. The terrorism of 9-11 was a false-flag operation that they sponsored and controlled through their strategic asset, the state of Israel. The Zionist-controlled media was then deployed to deceive the public about what really happened. The strategic goal was to change American public opinion and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to seize valuable assets and protect their beleaguered Zionist state. Undermining the United States by attacking the U.S. Constitution is simply part of their agenda. Understanding who is behind this evil agenda is essential to stopping it.
Learn the truth about the coming destruction of America at revelation12.ca
.
President Hillary Clinton in 2016 and 2020!
You just can’t wait to get your Nazi (national socialist) slave ass back on the Clinton Plantation
President Clinton or President Bush ALL OWNED BY THE SAME ROTHCHILDS/ROCKEFELLERS
the problem with the american system is that all politicians are bought and paid for before they get elected. this appears to be the fundamental fault. Elect people qualified for the job not bought and enslaved by the sale
Yes, bought and paid for by Coporate Lobbyists. Any policy, law
and every political office and politian are for sale to the highest bidding
corporation, country or individual- which is how it has always worked
and just look at billiary foundation (plantation) now. You would
have to devise a way to ban all corporate lobbyists which is impossible.
The important thing to me is the fact that it is an Indirect Election,
when all other elections are Direct Elections. The people get to cast a vote
in the POPULAR VOTE after the parties have made their choice- which is not
right, but the fact is the POPULAR VOTE does not determine the outcome- it
never has and never will. Unless you have one of the ELECTORAL VOTES- your popular
vote is counted- but doesn’t matter because it is NOT a popularity contest.
All Presidents except for 1 have been related. Not anyone can be
appointed as the Presidential puppet for the shadow government- first and
foremost you Must be in the bloodline- so that narrows the field immediately.
Jeb Bush is the only one I know in the bloodline without research, but of
course Billary- promised hillary she would be president as a Monica Lewinsky
make up gift and both of them are trilateral commission and bilderberg group
members who are the people that actually chose. The rest of it is show- of how much
you can control and influnence the populous (i.e the sheeple or goyim). Bottom
line is, you must be the best ‘related liar available and must do the bidding
of the New World Order- if not you will be whacked. That means- no going against
the Reserve Bankers of our foreign central bank- and never try to back their fake
paper currency with gold or silver- like Lincoln and Kennedy tried and were
promptly whacked for. Bottom line- you must be related- period.
Wow!!, you are a well informed person, only 10% or 15 % of the american people know what you just said.
With a worth of less than $100m, the family aren’t really part of the global equation.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/henry-blodget/are-the-sulzbergers-broke_b_168656.html
a tale of two cities>>>>>
Romeo and Juliet>>>>>
Wow! Racism at B4IN! So, of Rothschilds is the organ grinder then that means Obama is the monkey. Ouch!
Bush, Scott Walker, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, and Dick Cheney, all did the very same thing (private email accounts) but this didn’t even make news, the Clinton email story has aired on fox nonstop every since it broke but not one single word of any Republican doing the same thing.
In a congressional investigation it was found that as many as FIVE million emails where deleted and/or never turned over by Bush.
And fox news’s nonstop coverage of the Benghazi issue is the very same situation, there where 13 (linked below) similar such attacks under Bush, but again, this NEVER made any NEWS, not a single word of this aired on fox, and you can be assured it wont either.
Is this what you call “fair and balanced” reporting when everything is one sided??????
All of this is linked below if anyone cares to read.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/03/10/flashback-when-millions-of-lost-bush-white-hous/202820
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/what-if-dick-cheney-not-h_b_6900714.html
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/06/28/republicans-attacking-obama-missing-irs-emails-caught-web-hypocrisy.html
http://harpers.org/blog/2008/01/the-emails-that-dick-cheney-deleted/
All the links above are biased leftist propaganda.
Your seriously asking us to use media matters as a source?
Some choice, let’s see…Hilary, Obama, Jeb? Scraping the bottom of the barrel and coming up with 3 slime bags. USA is screwed. The sad thing is, apart from Ron Paul, there is not a single person in power at the moment that you could trust. So sad that it has finally come to this.
Hillery is such a disgusting hag that is in so deep with the New World Order / UB Agenda 2021 / Rothschilds
this entire thing is just a bogus JOKE.
Hillery is such a disgusting hag that is in so deep with the New World Order / UN Agenda 2021 / Rothschilds
this entire thing is just a bogus JOKE.