Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By The Daily Sheeple
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Is It Time for Civil Disobedience?

Thursday, May 14, 2015 5:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

obey

“Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.”

― Oscar Wilde

Ridiculous laws. Oppressive regulations. Widespread government corruption. Rampant police brutality. Excessive taxation.

Abuses of personal liberty have become commonplace in America, a country once known as the “land of the free.”

But are we partly to blame? After all, Americans have been voting for corrupt politicians for ages. Some justify this by saying they are voting for the “lesser of two evils,” but does that make sense? Isn’t that just choosing your own oppressors? By voting, are we validating a nefarious system?

Because rapacious politicians and their cronies are exploiting and plundering the masses for their own gain with no end in sight, perhaps it is time for us to take matters into our own hands.

In his piece for Reason titled Let’s All Disobey Stupid Laws, John Stossel suggests that noncompliance might be our best recourse now. He refers to a new book by Charles Murray who is a political scientist, author, and libertarian:

Charles Murray, already controversial for writing books on how welfare hurts the poor, on ethnic differences in IQ and on (less controversial, but my favorite) happiness and good government, has written a new book that argues that it’s time for civil disobedience. Government has become so oppressive, constantly restricting us with new regulations, that our only hope is for some of us to refuse to cooperate.

Murray’s suggestion—laid out in By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission —will make some people nervous. He argues that citizens and companies should start openly defying all but the most useful regulations, essentially ones that forbid assault, theft and fraud.

Stossel goes on to give examples of oppressive government policies:

While we try to invent new things, government constantly seeks new ways to control us. The number of federal crimes on the books is now 50 percent larger than back in 1980—a time when many people mistakenly thought the U.S. would cut the size of government.

Murray says, correctly, that no ordinary human being—not even a team of lawyers—can ever be sure how to obey the 810 pages of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 1,024 pages of the Affordable Care Act or 2,300 pages of Dodd-Frank.

What if we all stopped trying? The government can’t put everyone in jail. Maybe by disobeying enough stupid laws, we can persuade judges that only rules that prevent clear, real harm to individuals should be enforced: “no harm, no foul.”

Speaking of judges, another way to show we are not going to comply with unjust laws is jury nullification.

****

In A Power Governments Cannot Suppress, Howard Zinn says:

“The challenge remains. On the other side are formidable forces: money, political power, the major media. On our side are the people of the world and a power greater than money or weapons: the truth.

Truth has a power of its own. Art has a power of its own. That age-old lesson – that everything we do matters – is the meaning of the people’s struggle here in the United States and everywhere. A poem can inspire a movement. A pamphlet can spark a revolution. Civil disobedience can arouse people and provoke us to think, when we organize with one another, when we get involved, when we stand up and speak out together, we can create a power no government can suppress. We live in a beautiful country. But people who have no respect for human life, freedom, or justice have taken it over. It is now up to all of us to take it back.”

What will YOU do to help end the vicious cycle of tyranny that we are trapped in?

I’ll leave you with a quote from Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau:

I heartily accept the motto, — “That government is best which governs least”; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe, — “That government is best which governs not at all”; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Lily Dane of The Daily Sheeple.

Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”



Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/is-it-time-for-civil-disobedience_052015

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 4 comments
  • Is it time for civil disobedience?
    ANSWER:
    Why, yes! It is LONG overdue!

    What are you all waiting for?
    The Military DRAFT to be re-instituted?
    What DUMB pussy young people there are in the jew-nited Fraudulent Fascist states of TORTURE and MILITARY TERROR!

  • some things we can all do:

    fight every ticket in court, no matter how small. speeding, parking tickets, whatever. imagine the back log we could create! they expect us to simply pay, and most of us do! they count on our compliance!
    throw sand into the gears!

    at spotcheck, roadblocks, ask a million questions, take up their time!

    stop paying taxes! after the nuremberg trials, there were laws enacted REQUIRING all tax payers to stop funding criminal government. we all live under criminal occupation.

    become self-sufficient, grow food, use solar, barter, help your neighbour, get to know your neighbours! form tight communities.

    REMEMBER YOU CAN SAY NO! THEY EXPECT COMPLIANCE, SO BLOW THEIR MINDS AND DON’T COMPLY!!!

  • As such I do not consent to suffering the crimes of Personage, Barratry, Press-Ganging or Inland Piracy.

    For the Record of the court
    Under our corporate governments, no Sovereign can lawfully be tried or convicted of any statutory crime!
    a. “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”
    b. “As my Trustee, I want you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”
    c. “I wish to be compensated for $213.45, in redemption, the amount stated on the claim.”

    Statutes are not Law and the use of word “Shall” in the Statute
    is self-defeating as it means future tense and is not binding on
    a sovereign public.
    The meaning of the word “Shall” Defined below:
    “Shall defined to mean plan to, intend to, or expect to: used to
    say that something is expected to happen in the future.”

    a living American state citizen with all rights reserved, hereby make the following Statements:

    1) Corporate Statutes, rules, regulations, Codes, Civil statutes, do not apply to a Sovereign public absent a contract that complies with the Law of Contracts. Statutes and codes are self defeating due to the fact that the word “Shall” is used meaning future tense and therefore non-binding. As such:
    2) I do not consent to suffering the crimes of personage, barratry, press-ganging or inland piracy.
    3) Not granted, Implied or Tacit Consent.
    4) I Do not consent to or grant jurisdiction in this matter.
    5) I Do not understand the charges against me.
    6) The offer to contract is not accepted.
    7) I do not consent to accept the trustee’s offer of liability.
    8) I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.
    9) I do not consent to being the trustee or executor of the “Cestui Que Vie” Trust as I am the beneficiary of this constructive trust.
    10) I demand a bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.
    11) Not Actionable all rights unalienable claimed, know and reserved without prejudice.
    12) The court lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction as there is no flesh and blood victim. Subject matter jurisdiction requires: A competent witness or notarized affidavit demonstrating and injury. A statutory or common law basis for a remedy of the injury.
    13) Proof of jurisdiction must appear on the record of the court.
    14) The prosecution lacks standing. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the burden of establishing standing rests on the plaintiff. Standing has to exist at the time the case is filed. For “Standing to exist” there has to be an “injury in fact”.
    15) I stay at peace and retain all of my Natural and Unalienable Rights and guarantees and operate under American Common Law.

  • No “civil disobedience” was for 2008 to 2014. For the rest of 2015, at least, it should be “storming the Bastille”.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.