[rod-class] LIVE CALL Tonight, Fri, May 8 – 9:00PM – Update On 2015 PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL (PAG) TRAINING SCHOOL

>> Rod also recently filed 2 other docs into DC < < in text and signed PDFs regarding

Comments

Click here to cancel reply.

Your Comments

• snoop4truth

  “Rod Class” (whose full name is “Rodney DALE Class”) is fake in every way. He fraudulently impersonates everything that he claims to passionately hate.

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates an attorney at law (something he claims to hate). He unsuccessfully tries to represent people in court, fraudulently holds himself out as a “private attorney general” and fraudulently signs and seals his amateur (and always consistently-losing) court papers accordingly.

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a “retired federal judge” (something he claims to hate). He pretends to be “Judge DALE” in connection with fake legal articles posted online in which he claims that all attorneys and judges, like himself, are criminals, communists and traitors.

  Rod Class also fraudulently impersonates a law enforcement officer (something he claims to hate). He fraudulently pretends to be a “14th amendment, section 3 bounty hunter” and sometimes he purports to be in the “criminal division” of the same. He often fraudulently wears a fake, homemade law enforcement uniform and cap marked with official looking, but fake law enforcement emblems reflecting the same sort of non-sense. He drives a jeep marked with official looking, but fake law enforcement emblems on its doors and elsewhere reflecting the same sort of non-sense. He was actually convicted of outfitting this fraudulently marked Jeep with a real blue light manufactured for use by law enforcement agencies which could be operated by the Jeep’s electrical system.

  Psychologists could have a field day Rod Class and his delusional behavior and amateur belief system.

  Rod Class’ claim that he is a “private attorney general” and that he can “train” other people be “private attorneys general” like himself is as true as his claims online that he is a “retired federal judge” named “Judge DALE” (which uses Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke).

  The truth is that Rod Class is not now and has never been a “private attorney general” (a legal term that he has no ability to comprehend the meaning of).

  In reality, Rod Class is a failed amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE complete LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). A person with a 100% failure rate in court should not be posing as a “legal scholar”, a law professor, a “retired federal judge”, a “private attorney general” or a “law enforcement officer” or some other type of legal expert. And, certainly, a person with a 100% failure rate in the courts (in his own cases) should not be charging his victims $1,000 for “training” on how to be successful in court as a “private attorney general”. If you paid Rod Class $1,000 for training, then you were defrauded. You are a victim.

  In the real world, a “private attorney general” is a “public interest plaintiff”, someone who sues wrongdoers who violate civil rights, break environmental laws or who violate securities laws. The purpose of the “private attorney general doctrine” is to force the losing defendant (the wrongdoer) to pay the attorney fees of the winning plaintiff (the “private attorney general”) if, and only if, the winning plaintiff (the “private attorney general”) has actually hired a real, licensed attorney who actually wins the case for the winning plaintiff (the “private attorney general”). Go to Google Scholar and look up “Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968)” (only a plaintiff filing a public interest lawsuit can be a “private attorney general” and the purpose of the private attorney general doctrine is to relieve the winning plaintiff of the burden of having to pay paying his or her own attorney fees).

  So, a “private attorney general” is not some type of fake, unlicensed, self-proclaimed, lay person “attorney” who is authorized to “represent” people in court. (Remember, a “private attorney general” IS A PLAINTIFF, not someone who purports to “represent” a plaintiff, or a defendant for that matter). A “private attorney general” is not some type of lay person with special knowledge, training or skill in the law. So, a real “private attorney general” doesn’t need to know anything about the law. In order to get benefit of being a “private attorney general doctrine”, the winning plaintiff (the real “private attorney general”) must actually hire a real, licensed attorney who actually wins the case.

  If you would like to know whether Rod Class is now or has ever been a “private attorney general” ask him to show you his own court losses in the following cases: In re Carl Pertuset, Vera Pertuset, debtors, 492 BR 232, Case no. 11-15607, United States bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Decided March 5, 2012 (available on Google Scholar); In re Pertuset; Vera Pertuset, Debtors, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, 6th Circuit Panel, Case No. 12-8014, 2012, Decided and Filed December 18th, 2012 (available on Google Scholar).

  For the actual law on other charlatans who pretend to be “private attorney generals” who claim that they are entitled to represent others in court, go to Google Scholar and look up: Malinay v. Nishimura, Case No. 13-00372 SOM-KSC, United States Dist. Court, D. Hawaii 2013 (Anthony Williams may not represent others in court even if he calls himself a “private attorney general”, “attorney in fact” or “power of attorney”); Wilfong v. Meeker, No. 5:12-CV-674-D, United States Dist. Court, North Carolina, Western Division, 2013 (a “private attorney general” may not represent others in court); Myers v. AT&T Corporation, United States Dist. Court, D. South Carolina 2013 (“private attorney general” may not represent others in court); Wallace v. Trust Company of Oklahoma, Dist. Court, E.D. Missouri, 2012 (“private attorney general” may not represent others in court).

  Aug 27, 2015, 2:11 pm 0 Reply
• snoop4truth

  Rod Class is not now, and has never been a “private attorney general”. Rodney Class can not “train” you or anybody else on how to become a “private attorney general”. Rod Class lacks the intellectual ability to comprehend what a “private attorney general” actually is.

  Rod Class is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE COMPLETE AND TOTAL LOSSES ANS STILL COUNTING).

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates everything that he claims to hate, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and every person employed by all governmental and law making institutions.

  Case and Point: Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a “retired federal judge” (something that he claims to hate). Specifically, he pretends to be “Judge DALE” (which uses his middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke) when writing fake legal articles that reveal fake legal information that are posted online.

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates attorneys (something that he claims to hate). Specifically, he pretends to be a “private attorney general” and unsuccessfully attempts to “represent” his victims in court. Likewise, he even signs and seals his amateur “paper work” accordingly.

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a law enforcement officer (something that he claims to hate). Specifically, he had created and frequently wears a homemade law enforcement officer uniform and hat which bear official looking, but fake, law enforcement emblems indicating that he is a “private attorney general” in the “criminal division” and that he is a “14th amendment, section 3 bounty hunter” (to make him look like a law enforcement officer). Likewise, he affixed similar official looking, but fake, law enforcement emblems and logos on the doors of his Jeep that he drives (to make it look like a law enforcement vehicle). Finally, he was actually convicted of outfitting his fake-marked-Jeep with a real law enforcement blue light manufactured for use by law enforcement agencies which could be operated by the Jeep’s electrical system (to make his Jeep look like a law enforcement vehicle).

  Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a governmental prosecutor (something he claims to hate). Specifically, he files non-sense papers in court and elsewhere in which he accuses his perceived enemies (mostly governmental employees) with crimes (like a governmental prosecutor).

  Rod Class also fraudulently impersonates a person with a governmental body with authority to create the law and to create a legal system (all of which he claims to hate). Specifically, along with others, he pretends to be forming the “International Tribunal Of Natural Justice”, purportedly, a new world government and a new legal system with new laws that met with his approval.

  Psychologists analyzing Rod Class would have a field day analyzing his imitation of everything that he claims to hate, his delusional behavior and his amateur belief system.

  But, most importantly for the purpose of this comment, Rod Class can not teach you or anyone else to become a “private attorney general”, a legal term that Rod Class has no comprehension of the meaning of.

  A “private attorney general” is simply a “public interest plaintiff” who files a civil suit (ex: civil rights violation, environmental violation, securities violation) that benefits others who are not parties to the suit. The purpose of the “private attorney general doctrine” is to relieve such a “public interest plaintiff” (the real “private attorney general”) of the burden of paying his or her attorney fees. See, e.g. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968) (only a party plaintiff filing a public interest law suit can be a “private attorney general”, the purpose of the private attorney general doctrine is to relieve the winning public interest plaintiff of the burden of having to pay his or her attorney fees). That case is available on Google Scholar.

  Contrary to Rod Class’ claim to the contrary, a “private attorney general” is not some type of fake, unlicensed, pretend “attorney” who can represent others in court. Likewise, a “private attorney general” is not some type of lay person with special knowledge and expertise in the law.

  If you would like to know whether Rod Class is now, or has ever been a “private attorney general”, then ask him to show you his loses on that very subject in In Re Carl Pertuset, Vera Pertuset, Debtors, 492 BR 232, Case no. 11-15607, Decided March 5, 2012; In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset, Bankruptcy Appellate panel, 6th Circuit, Decided December 18, 2012. Both cases are available on Google Scholar for free.

  If you would like to know how other purported “private attorneys general” are doing in court, then go to Google Scholar and look up: Malinay v. Nishimura, U.S. Dist. Court, D. Hawaii, Case No. 13-00372 SOM-KSC, August 14, 2013 (Anthony Williams may not represent persons in court even if he calls himself a “private attorney general”, an “attorney in fact” or a “power of attorney”, only a real license attorney at law can represent others in court); Wilfong v. Meeker, U.S. Dist. Court, North Carolina, Western Division, Case no. 5:12-CV-674-D, April 22, 2013 (a “private attorney general” may not represent others in court, only a real licensed attorney at law may represent others in court). Both cases are available on Google Scholar for free.

  A person with a 100% failure rate in the courts should not be holding himself out as a “legal scholar”, impersonating a “retired federal judge”, pretending to be a “private attorney general”, posing as a law enforcement officer or masquerading as a legal expert. Most importantly, a person with a 100% failure rate in the courts should not be charging his victims $1,000 for training on how to become a “private attorney general”, a leqal term that he has no comprehension of. If you have paid Rod Class for such “training”, you have been defrauded. You are a victim.

  Aug 28, 2015, 11:16 am 0 Reply
• snoop4truth

  ROD CLASS & THE “DEBRA JONES HOAX”

  Rodney DALE Class (“Rod Class”) is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education. Class has LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). Despite a year long investigation, we have not yet found a single case involving Class that he (or his side) ever won. The reason that Class has a 100% failure rate in the courts is that he uses amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) in court as if they were REAL laws. Class’ amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL laws that are actually used by the courts and the legal system. If Class’ amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) were actually valid, then he would not have LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). No person with a verifiable 100% FAILURE RATE IN COURT should be masquerading as a “teacher”, “legal scholar”, “retired federal judge”, “Private Attorney General”, “Bounty Hunter” or some similar nonsense title.

  But more importantly, Class is also a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER. Class is behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” in which he writes FAKE legal articles which reveal FAKE legal information while fraudulently impersonating a FAKE “retired federal judge” named “Judge DALE” (which uses his own middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). (Impersonating a retired federal judge, is a federal felony). Class is also behind the “FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property In Other People’s Names Hoax”, the “Private Attorney General Hoax”, the “Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax”, the “CRIS Hoax” and many, many other legal hoaxes. Class uses these legal hoaxes to help him sell his amateur belief system about the law and the legal system to other amateur legal theorists. But, most importantly, for purposes of this comment, Class is also behind the “Debra Jones Hoax”.

  THE HOAX
  Class has own internet radio show on AIB radio which he uses to sell his amateur belief system about the law and the legal system––the same legal system in which he has LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING).

  On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869, Class purported to bring in a “legal insider” as a guest on his radio show in order to validate, bolster and to provide support for his own amateur legal theorists about the law and the legal system. Class FRAUDULENTLY introduced this FAKE “legal insider” as “former attorney” and “former law enforcement officer”, “Debra Jones’’. As if those FRAUDULENT claims about Debra Jones were not bad enough, Debra Jones herself also FRAUDULENTLY claimed that she was once being “groomed” by the “Police Benevolent Association” to be “President of the United States” (an office that Rod Class himself once purported to run for as a “write-in candidate”). (In an apparent effort to cover all of the bases, Debra Jones has since added the titles “Dr.”, “ordained minister”, “martial artist” and “hypnotic therapist” to her resume’).

  Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, this FAKE “legal insider” mindlessly “parroted” the same “amateur legal theories” (FAKE laws) and utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. Rod Class’ radio audience was understandably shocked and horrified by the FAKE, FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims of Debra Jones who they genuinely believed was a real “legal insider” who was telling them the truth. This FRAUDULENT radio show became an internet sensation and was re-posted all over the web, much to the delight of Rod Class and Debra Jones.

  THE TRUTH
  But, before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Debra Jones was NEVER a “former real estate attorney”, NEVER a “former law enforcement officer” and that she was NEVER being “groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be “President of the United States”. The truth about Debra Jones is as follows::
  1. Debra Jones’ REAL name is “Debra Jenks Jones”;
  2. Debra Jenks Jones was born on May, 29, 1967;
  3. As of today, Debra Jenks Jones is currently 49 years old;
  4. Debra Jenks Jones’ social security number is (redacted) 531-80-XXXX;
  5. Debra Jenks Jones lives at (redacted) XXXX XXXth Street Court, Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State, 98375-6130 and has lived there since April of 1995. This is the reason that many of her “seminars” on “voodoo law” are CONVENIENTLY held in the nearby Yelp, Washington State area;
  6. Debra Jenks Jones HAS NEVER HAD a “professional license” of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE which means that she was NEVER an “ attorney”, a person who would have had a “professional license” from at least one state (at least at some point in time in the past). This is the reason why Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the law school from which she allegedly received her law degree. This is also the reason that Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the state or states that allegedly issued her a license to practice law. Such a law school does not exist and such a state does not exist;
  7. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER a “law enforcement officer” in any jurisdiction. This is the REAL reason why Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name and location of the alleged law enforcement agency (or agencies) in which she was an allegedly employed as a “law enforcement officer”. Such a law enforcement agency does not exist;
  8. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER “being groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be the President Of The United States”. This is the REAL reason that she will not reveal the names of the many people within that organization who were allegedly “grooming” her, the place where she was allegedly being “groomed” or the exact manner in which she was allegedly being “groomed”; 9. Debra Jenks Jones’ false claims to the effect that she grew up in Washington, D.C. and that she was a “former Congressional Aid” to a conveniently DEAD Congressman (to make verification impossible) in the “nation’s capital” was a self-glorifying fraud intended to throw investigators off of her trail as well as serving as an inside joke (because she really lives in Washington State, not in Washington, D.C.);
  10. Debra Jones’ published address on one of her three websites of “55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California, 94610” is a fraud intended to throw investigators off her trail. This FAKE address causes persons looking for her to futilely look for her in the state of California, rather than in the state of Washington State, where she actually lives and does “business” while pretending to be a “former real estate attorney” and a “former law enforcement officer” when peddling her “seminars” on “voodoo law”, “FAKE law” and “amateur legal theories”;
  11. Debra Jenks Jones’ published phone number on one of her three websites is “(360) 458-6678”. The fact that Debra Jenks Jones lives in Puyallup, Washington is the real reason that the area code for that phone number is “360”. Area code “360” is not the area code for Oakland, California (her published business address) or Washington, D.C. where she falsely claims to have grown up. Instead, area code “360” is the area code for that portion of Washington State south of Tacoma, Washington, where Puyallup, Washington is located (and where she has lived since 1995).
  12. Debra Jenks Jones operates THREE FRAUDULENT WEBSITES in order to illegally and fraudulently solicit money from her victims; KnowMore-Laws.com; TrustUSproviders.com and ProTrustAcadmey.com.
  13. As an complete OUTSIDER to the REAL law and the REAL legal system, Debra Jones has no “inside information” about the inner workings of the REAL law and the REAL system to share with you or with anyone else. She is a complete and total fraud. When you think about it, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the “Judge DALE Hoax” have much in common. In the “Debra Jones Hoax”, Debra Jones manufactured FAKE titles and FAKE credentials for herself to help her “sell” her amateur belief system in the same way that in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Rod Class manufactured a FAKE title and FAKE credentials for himself to help him “sell” his amateur belief system. Thus, Debra Jones fraudulently impersonates a FAKE “former attorney” and a FAKE “former police officer” when “selling” her amateur belief system while Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a FAKE “former federal judge” when “selling” his amateur belief system.

  NOTE: It is a federal felony to use a “means of interstate commerce” (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting and collecting money from victims for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a “former attorney” and/or a “former police officer”). It is a state crime to impersonate an ”attorney”. It is also a state crime to impersonate a “law enforcement officer). In many states, it is a state crime to impersonate a “Dr” or a clergyman, like an “ordained minister”.

  NOTE:
  Jean Haines of https://jhaines6.wordpress.com did much to re-publish and perpetrate the “Debra Jones Hoax” among her own online readers/victims. Ms. Haines wrote a glowing article in which she lavished heavy praise on “Debra Jones”. In response, dozens of Ms. Haines’ readers/victims wrote to her and specifically asked her for the very information that we have provided herein (details on Debra Jenks Jones’ REAL background and her REAL contact information). In late 2015, we attempted to answer all those questions by posting an early draft of this very document among the comments below Ms. Haines’ article. But, during the “moderation” process, Ms. Haines saw fit to block this comment from being posted on her website (or otherwise caused this comment to not be posted there). In so doing, Ms. Haines thereby prevented her own readers/victims from receiving the TRUE facts about Debra Jones contained in this post, facts that they had specifically asked her for.

  CONCLUSION:
  Everything that Rod Class has ever told you is as true as his claims to the effect that Debra Jones is a “former real estate attorney” and “former law enforcement officer”. The reality is that Rod Class will not hesitate to lie to you and to defraud you if doing so helps him “sell” his “amateur belief system” about the law and the legal system to you. Needless to say, if you paid Debra Jones hundreds or thousands of dollars to attend one or more of her seminars in the belief that she is a “former real estate attorney” and a “former police woman”, then you were defrauded and ripped-off. You should demand your money back and/or contact law enforcement authorities. Lying to the American people about their law and their legal system is an act of treason against the American people and should be treated accordingly. Rod Class and Debra Jones should be ashamed of themselves for committing this VICIOUS ATTACK on the America people. They should both immediately apologize to the American people for what they have done and they should both immediately discontinue their pattern of fraud upon the American people.

  CONTACT DEBRA JONES:
  If you are among the dozens of people on https://jhaines6.wordpress.com who still wish to reach Debra Jenks Jones, the FAKE former “attorney” and the FAKE former “ law enforcement officer” who intentionally lied to you and defrauded you on Rod Class’ AIB radio talk show, you may do so by using the following contact information:
  1. Call her at her published phone number appearing on one of her three websites of (360) 458-6678 (this number is also reportedly used by “Sleepsonic, LLC, 303 1st Street South #2 Yelm, Washington State 98597”);
  2. Look her up in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State and write her (we will not publish her full
  address online);
  3. Email her at her published email address of [email protected]
  4. Write her at her FAKE published business address at TrustUP (sic) Providers, 55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California 94610 (and hope that your letter gets forwarded to her REAL address in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State);
  5. Try reaching her through her three known websites, Knowmore-laws.com, TrustUSproviders.com and Protrustacademy.com.
  6. Contact Rod Class and ask him for her REAL contact information.
  7. Contact Jean Haines at her website at https://jhaines6.wordpress.com and ask for her REAL contact information.
  8. “LightInDarkness”, a senior writer with Quatloos.com. claims that Debra Jones once announced that she could be contacted at [email protected] and at 323-642-8277. So, you might also try those avenues when trying to reach this FAKE “legal insider”.
  —————————————————————————————————————
  ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH

  Snoop4truth is a legal expert who opposes the New World Order, globalization, corporatism, The Federal Reserve, fractional reserve banking (which is pure fraud and theft), false flag operations, endless wars and the contamination of our air, water, food and natural resources.

  Snoop4truth opposes the main-stream-media and legal disinformation for precisely the same reason, the people behind both disseminate intentionally false and fraudulent information in order to advance their own agenda at the expense of the American people who they fraudulently claim to serve.

  Snoop4truth did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims in order to harm Rod Class or Debra Jenks Jones. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the falsity of Rod Class’ claim solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such PURPOSEFUL AND INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day.

  Had it not been for the Rod Class’ role in creating and perpetuating the “Judge DALE Hoax”, then Snoop4truth would not have exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims about the law and the legal system.

  There is a world of difference between an amateur legal theorist making an innocent mistake about the law on one hand and a charlatan manufacturing an elaborate hoax about the law to defraud the American people on the other hand. Snoop4truth will only expose those charlatans who engage in elaborate hoaxes about the law to defraud the American people. This is why, to date, Snoop4truth has only exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax” and the “Debra Jones Hoax”. Snoop4truth has no quarrel with the amateur legal theorist who makes a simple innocent mistake about the law. Such people are mistaken, but they are not charlatans. There is a difference.

  Apr 8, 2016, 10:59 am 0 Reply