Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Incredible And Flat Out Outrageous! You Would Not Believe What Scientists For Accurate Radiation Information Are Trying To Pass And Why! (Video)

Sunday, August 16, 2015 14:28
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

Incredible And Flat Out Outrageous! Scientists For Accurate Radiation Information Trying To Pass Rad Exposure As …. 

 

16 Aug 15

 

FREAKIN BLOW YOUR MIND WITH THIS STUFF! Check THIS out!

And remember, that volcano that is ready to BLOW near yet another nuclear plant in Japan? Click Here if you havent heard. Add THAT with THIS information? Chit! Yeah, keep the sheeple CALM and ignorant. Jerks. Why, surre… radiation is GOOD for us!

 

The petition for rule making was submitted by Dr. Mohan Doss, on behalf of Scientist for Accurate Radiation Information, and “supports and supplements” petition PRM-20-28. This petitioner provides additional information suggesting that “low-dose radiation reduces cancer risk” (i.e., has a hormetic [beneficial] effect) and suggests that the “LNT model is no longer justifiable.” The petitioner further states that the use of the LNT hypothesis in the NRC’s regulations has “had a major detrimental effect on public health, since they have prevented the study of LDR [low-dose radiation] for controlling aging-related diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, etc. in spite of studies showing the promise of LDR for the diseases.” The petitioner suggests that “urgency of action on this petition” is necessary because “any potential future accident involving release of radioactive materials in the USA would likely result in panic evacuation because of the LNT—model-based cancer fears and concerns, resulting in considerable casualties and economic damage such as have occurred in Fukushima.” The petitioner further suggests that the “recognition of a threshold dose by NRC would obviate the need for such panic evacuations, associated casualties, and economic harm” when radiation is released in the environment.
For additional information, see the filed petitions for rulemaking in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML15051A503, ML15057A349, and ML15075A200.

 

 

 

 

#nuclear #radiation #japan

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.